CV19 Vax Causes ‘Turbo Cancer’ – Dr. Ryan Cole

USA Watchdog ^ | 11 Oct 23 | Dr Cole

[SaxxonWoods]

Lot a sis-in-law this way. In remission from a melanoma for over 15 years, tested clean every year. After shots and booster, cancer back, spread everywhere, gone in about 5 weeks, after multiple surgeries. They couldn’t keep up with it.

[delta7]

I was told by every doctor I came in contact with, and there were many, that I would die if I DID NOT get that shot.

I knew better. They were wrong, and I was right
———-
Amen. That I assume ( as in my case) was the “ gift of Discernment”. I can tell you many stories of those that “ ran to God” ( prayed about taking the MRNA jab) instead of listening to the “ science” were gifted with a large dose of Discernment.

A lesson to be learned.

[Retrofitted]

I was nervous at first, when they sealed the nation's borders and states were stopping interstate travel. When the borders were re-opened and I was told I needed to get a vaccine so other people wouldn't die, well, yeah, nope. Done.

I lost eight friends in the last three years, all from cancer, none with a history of cancer, all vaxed and vaxed again. Yeah, it's anecdotal, but enough anecdotes becomes a cliche.

[entropy12]

If true, will 265 million jabbed Americans will soon get turbo cancer?

[entropy12]

Cancer has been #2 killer of Americans since George Washington was president. Heart attacks being #1.

[grey_whiskers]

Hi Bikkuri, up for a game of “whack-a-mole?”

Not ripe yet, but keep an eye open

[grey_whiskers]

Bikkuri here’s another.

[grey_whiskers]

Sod off, troll.

[Fury]

A good article on Cole:

https://idahocapitalsun.com/2022/05/06/taking-covid-19-funds-cole-was-reckless-with-lab-operations-records-and-former-staff-say/

Cole was at the COVID-19 testing trough, slurping the dollars up, albeit at a lower amount than the big hospital organizations.

[Vahan1987]

I don’t know about every single one.

[icclearly]

What they meant was since your immunity is likely at least somewhat below normal due to cancer treatment, you would be at greater risk of dying from Covid if you happened to catch it.

I am keenly aware of why they told me that.

You may forget. The "narrative" was that the shot would be 95% effective against getting COVID. A claim that was wildly wrong!

When that didn't pan out, they claimed you were less likely to die if you had the shot -- no longer a claim of immunity.

The story kept changing, and today, I have seen many studies that do not support that made-up theory. In fact, for those with multiple shots, the outcome is worse!

By the way, I'm not lucky. I took precautions and did not catch COVID in the first wave but did in the second wave.

And, by the way, I'm not dead yet.

The docs were wrong and I was right.

[Texas Fossil]

No, it is not absurd.

Shedding is possible with this treatment.

There has been evidence of it for over a year.

The people who get recurrent cases of Covid, are the ones who have had the injections. Not those who were exposed to the virus and recovered.

I’m 75. Neither my wife or I have had any of the shots. We are doing fine. I’ve been exposed many times.

[citizen]

I’m of the opinion that many in the know in the medical field didn’t take the actual jab. They either said they did or they received a placebo.

[icclearly]

A lesson to be learned.

INDEED!

I believe in modern medicine and science in general. But a) they both can be wrong and b) I can smell a rat when it shows up.

It ranks up there as one of the biggest boondoggles our feeble leaders have ever made!

My "rat" meter went off the scale with the hype and reaction to COVID.

Maybe God gave me a gift :-).

As one of the best presidents in my lifetime said, "Trust but verify."

[Steve Van Doorn]

From your article it says,
"(Coles tests) would have caused people with COVID-19 to receive negative test results"

Notice the employee doesn't argue that the tests could've been more accurate. he said, “It was volume over safety and accuracy,” Carter
Carter doesn't clarify what "volume over (accuracy)" means
My guess on what that means. They couldn't keep up with the volume of patients if they where more accurate. If that is true they should use sample testing of some of the pt to see how accurate the PCR tests are.

Pointless statement. Why did you claim, "A good article on Cole:"?

[delta7]

Maybe God gave me a gift :-)
————-
Drop the “ maybe”. You ( we) didn’t smell a rat on our own, He rules over everything in the spiritual realm of the created order.

[icclearly]

Drop the “ maybe”. You ( we) didn’t smell a rat on our own, He rules over everything in the spiritual realm of the created order.

You are correct!

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "Cancer has been #2 killer of Americans since George Washington was president. Heart attacks being #1."

That is likely to change in the next 10 years. you know the sad part?
In the Rush to remove Hydroxychloroquine from the market they made the statement that HCQ "inhibit autophagy"

In other words. Hydroxychloroquine Allows virus to attack cancer and leaves healthy cells alone
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7561246/

We where simply looking at why HCQ was no longer used for covid and happened to notice HCQ fights cancer. With two freaking words in a report attacking HCQ for covid.
W-h-a-t-?

[JoeRed]

Science based medicine vs evidence based medicine. That opinion piece posted on a science based medicine blog is full of insults but no evidence. The science based medicine supporters had many people fooled into believing that a vaccinated person couldn’t get infected or spread covid. Evidence based medicine proved them wrong. Now the same people are claiming that there’s no scientific mechanism for the “vaccine” to cause cancer.

[Fury]

Re: 55 - I wrote it was a good article because it provided quite a bit of detail with primary sourcing.