Posted on 01/17/2023 11:14:08 PM PST by fireman15
Mikovits yesterday
It’s so logical even a caveman or a democrat could understand it. Logic is non-partisan.
If one supports freedom of speech, ownership of firearms & the presumption of innocence before proven guilty (as opposed to the converse) as bedrock foundations of our Republic, simple logic extends to the presumption of harmful before proven safe.
It’s the worst form of hypocrisy and, obviously, the tell of a troll.
I’m not sure that he was besmirching Kirsch but, rather, pointing out to the extent which they’ve vilified him (see his tagline).
Way too many people seem to feel or think that trust is something owed them instead of something you have to earn.
No, trust is not my default option when I am encouraging a new person or situation.
I need to make sure that I am trustworthy. That is my only responsibility. It is not my responsibility to blindly trust others.
Bkmrk
So glad I didn’t take any mRNA based vaccine. Commonsense prevailed.
There was a knee-jerk genuflection by FRoctors, instead of critical thinking.
And frankly, I think they are nice people, but in this instance, they came unglued by insulting everyone who disagreed.
I hope we get back to normal around here someday.
“ The only people actually profiting after covid are the top 1%.”
Oh no, the 1%
Are you Occupy Wall Street?
-
Your comment is that it’s ok for this Kirsch guy to grift off Covid is ok because Pfizer is making even more in their grift?
...people here who slander him here almost everyday....
______________________________________
And they do so while using his invention, the optical mouse.
Kirsch is a numbers guy. And he has skin in the game, as he received at least one inoculation.
...it’s ok for this Kirsch guy to grift off Covid is ok because Pfizer is making even more in their grift?
__________________________________
Kirsch uses his own money from his own inventions/company and sells nothing connected to his advocacy that I am aware of. He has been cancelled, lost friends and networks. He took the shot.
Pfizer made their money from the taxpayers via government payments all over the world, not to mention secret contracts that demanded national security assets as collateral. They coerced immunity back in the day because there were so many lawsuits for damage (and the # of injuries was far lower than from the mRNA shot), they threatened to go out of business if they didn’t get immunity. Everyone bought into the necessity for vaccines and so the immunity was granted. Pfizer employees were exempted from shot mandates.
I only see a one-sided grift.
Even now, Kirsch offers $1M-$5M to anyone who will prove him wrong in a public, recorded debate while Big Pharma spends its billions to silence all opposition via ownership of all media, including technical publications. They have doubled down by declaring all injectables from here on out will utilize mRNA, which is engendering even more distrust in modern medicine.
I know who has earned more respect from me, but YMMV.
https://ploughshares.org/about-us/advisors/steve-kirsch
https://www.treatearly.org/donate
https://www.kirschfoundation.org/site_utilities/contact_us.html
https://www.campaignmoney.com/political/contributions/steve-kirsch.asp?cycle=20
I’ve been off the site for a few days. I see a list of charitable ventures and some small political contributions. Not one is related to asking for money related to investigation of vaxxine injury or sells anything at all. I fail to see how this evidences grifting.
Kirsch has been open about formerly supporting Ds. Most of the frontine, so-called misinformation spreaders were formerly staunch liberals or establishment R supporters (ie: Uniparty). They are now mostly red-pilled.
As to the substance of this discussion, I have noticed an uptick in MSM sources highly critical of CDC, *vaxxines” and demanding investigation of the entire phenomena that is known as “Died Suddenly.”
The times, they are a’changing.
This Kirscsh guy is smart, often makes good points, I’ve given him benefit of the doubt a lot.
AFAIK, all he’s done is asked for a public debate with verified data.
You did see Dr Wen (CNN), former advocate for isolating/punishing all the vax-free, now saying 1) her own child was harmed by the lockdown/masking/school closures and 2) oh, yeah: the numbers of cases of C19 were knowingly inflated by a lot?
The vaunted FDA is now proposing to prohibit ALL off label usage of drugs/devices. Will the medical community ask for lube?
I think those who are pro-vax often received erroneous medical information from someone in medical field. They cannot face their mistake—So many of the Sudden Death accounts don’t state a cause—just that the victim died suddenly and/or peacefully in sleep.
Silk is one of the few who was brave and publicly pointed a finger close to directly at the vaccines.
Eh then there are the shills...Tho I don’t see them around as much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.