Posted on 07/27/2022 7:55:43 AM PDT by one guy in new jersey
Thank you very much!
You’re welcome!
Yes.
“It’s not necessarily the search engines. One thing PR people do is create large numbers of things that will show up on a search, overwhelming with numbers.”
From GAB:
“DuckDuckGo CEO Gabriel Weinberg has announced
that the search engine will begin purging all
independent media outlets from the platform and will
replace them with “trusted” mainstream media outlets
instead.”
Oh well. It still holds though. I changed to Brave a couple of years back.
Didn’t mean to hit this again today but I came across this excellent video interview with Dr. James Thorpe - OB/GYN for 40 years, board-certified; specializes in maternal fetal medicine, which is high-risk pregnancies. He treats 6,000-7,000 high-risk pregnancies each year. It’s about 35 minutes and is worth watching in its entirety.
He describes how doctors have effectively been given a gag order and are not allowed to spread “vaccine disinformation” - at the risk of losing certifications and being rebuked by professional associations within the medical establishment. There is no grant funding available to independent physicians to explore potential toxicity of the vax. Doctors are also prohibited from doing their own independent quantitative analytics on the vaccine, even of their own patients.
He discusses a study in NEJM and that it was ghostwritten by Pfizer, and how data was manipulated to show less vax damage. He says that women getting vaxxed in the last trimester didn’t have as many reactions, and that their stats were dumped in with first trimester data.
He mentions this Pfizer document. Pages 12-13 show data for 270 pregnancies. Of 124 that had reported clinical events - 49 were considered non-serious, 75 were considered serious. That’s a 27% rate for serious medical reactions. Dr. Thorpe states that as soon as this was released (4-28-2021), the FDA - and other agencies and governing bodies - should have immediately restricted the vax for pregnant women. Didn’t happen; in fact the FDA and the medical establishment throughout still strongly urge pregnant women to get jabbed.
An odd thing I noticed in the Pfizer doc is that three times as many women than men were in the study: 29,914 female vs. 9,182 males. (page 7)
Thanks for posting that.
”Although not directly comparable, calculated proportions of adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in persons vaccinated against Covid-19 who had a completed pregnancy were similar to incidences reported in studies involving pregnant women that were conducted before the Covid-19 pandemic…Preliminary findings did not show obvious safety signals among pregnant persons who received mRNA Covid-19 vaccines.”
And your Table 4 shows that the rate of miscarriage before 20 weeks for vaccinated people is squarely in the range detected before Covid.
CDC has live births by month for 2021 and the first three months of 2022. The average for 2021 is just under 305,000. The average for 2022 is just under 292,000, a decrease of over 4%, which could be significant.
The three months in 2022 are each higher than the same month in 2021.
I just listened to an interview of Dr. James Thorp.
I’m not sure, but in this interview he may be pointing out what he believes was blatant fraud with respect to this very table and the NEJM article in which it apoears, which fraud intentionally facilitated the utterance of the very statement you made, seemingly to ward people away from truly horrific outcomes during pregnancy for the vaccinated women in the study. In other words, revealing you as a gaslighter.
Yes. I’ve just confirmed it. This is the faudulent paper in the NEJM Dr. Thorp discussed in his interview earlier this month. You are gaslighting based on a fraudulent paper. The point you made is the very deceptive, and timely so, point that Dr. Thorp says was intentionally facilitated by the fraudulent manipulation of data associated with that very table, and with that very paper. In other words, the fraudulent point you have just parroted was the very one that was used at a crucial time to give false cover to the manufacturers when the truth, if uttered instead, would have stopped these “vaccines” dead in their tracks.
Shame on you!
Thank you very much for directing me to this interview of Dr. Thorp. He is Lou Gehrig to Dr. Peter McCullough’s Babe Ruth to Dr. Robert Malone’s Ty Cobb. Thank heavens for these honest, honorable, derp thinking and impossibly accomplished men.
It’s also the paper you linked to to support one of your points. Why are you using sources you think are fraudulent?
And I listened to the interview. Dr. Thorp has absolutely no data to support his “suspicion” that the paper’s fraudulent. None.
All he has is a feeling that Pfizer ghost-wrote the NEJM paper but nothing to back it up.
Does he have any data that conflicts with the paper? Of course not. It’s just that the actual research doesn’t support his narrative so he claims it must be bogus. Conspiracy theory 101.
You should be even more concerned that he’s knowingly misrepresenting VAERS. He’s a doctor and knows better but has so little respect for you that he’s willing to pretend otherwise.
Shame on you!
So let’s see. I have peer researched data from the NEJM and you have one OBGYN with a suspicion and a proven tendency to deceive. Not really feeling the shame…
“Why are you using sources you think are fraudulent?”
The scales do have a tendency to fall from one’s eyes in certain circumstances.
If a man with Dr. Thorp’s credentials, 175 publications of peer-reviewed scientific papers and proceedings of major meetings, and 42 years of personal experience as a ohysician actually treating the better part of 10,000 high risk pregnant women each year, with that number only having increased during the pandemic, has seized upon the NEJM article in question as nit only fraudulent, but fraudulent in a specific way which strategically advanced a false narrative at a crucial point in time that allowed an unsafe Pfizer product to be characterized as safe, I’m going to pay attention. I learned something new, and observed that you knew exactly what to say about that study—the very thing that Dr. Thorp himself specifically pointed out was what the Pfizer fraudsters and their sycophants said at that crucial time to avoid scrutiny for a lack of safety.
As far as OGINJ is concerned, thou art busted, and busted thou shalt stay!
You’re very welcome.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.