Posted on 05/25/2021 4:24:30 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
Machines rejecting thousands of ballots or as the media calls it an honest election.
Certified chemical laboratories that analyze customers’ solid and aqueous samples for EPA-required reporting of chemical analyte concentrations must follow approved (usually standardized) methods. The lab’s certification (verified by an annual review) includes documenting training, calibration, analyses, instrument maintenance, administrative, data and IT security procedures and actions.
The process of holding an election should be no less rigorous in the use of independently-verified procedures and documentation covering training, equipment use and maintenance, ballot-processing, data-handling and storage, IT security, and administration.
Election officials who cannot readily supply documentation verifying these kinds of procedures are available and have been implemented should be suspended pending an independent investigation into their election process.
I hear you loud and clear...
“Raise your hand if you think that a county IT department adheres to these kinds of procedures!”
“Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?”
My mistake. Thanks for the correction...
And they do this with the help of a compliant and collaborative media.
...........................................
And also with the help of compliant and collaborative REPUBLICANS!
“if someone voted for all four Republican candidates and the ballot happened to have its fold line going through St. Laurent’s target, then that might be interpreted by the machines as an overvote, which would then subtract votes from each of those four Republican candidates,”
Such a coincidence that ALL errors and oopsies worked against the GOP across all contested states.
“Such a coincidence that ALL errors and oopsies worked against the GOP across all contested states.”
I’m not buying that it was a mistake. I ran elections for a few years in a medium sized city. For months before an election our Data Processing Review Board ran test ballots through machines trying to anticipate every possible anomaly or issue. And THIS issues — folds in a certain place — would have been an easy one to consider, test, and fix.
I thought my post was sufficiently sarcastic without the /s close.
“I thought my post was sufficiently sarcastic without the /s close.”
It definitely was. :) I knew it was sarcasm. I was just adding to it.
Okay!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.