Posted on 05/25/2021 4:24:30 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
She did not trigger it.
The locals all knew O’Biden did not win their election. It is a strong Republican area.
“Honestly though, we know Trump should have won in a landslide”
Correction: Trump did win in a landslide. We know it.
Now what? You ask.
Do you know anything about Trump? Can you answer your own question? Critical thinking. It takes reading (in this case, about the man. Much is written about and by him), considering, tuning out ignorant people and keeping quiet. It takes not caring about convincing others.
There’s an answer to that question. Now what?
Accuvote and Dominion taught them.
Dominion owns Accuvote’s software and both have similar problems.
Carlyle Group owns Staple Street Capital
Staple Street Capital did own Dominion (until October 2020)
Now it is owned by China.
Do you need any further explanation?
The Ruling Establish stole the election.
They know it. We know it.
So what?
At this point, it would take intervention by the military or a counter-revolution from the citizens.
So far, *crickets* from both.
Honestly? NO
“ 60%?
That’s like, more than half wrong.”
I believe that. You don’t? You saw what the media tried to hide- trump overflowed stadiums while Biden couldn’t fill an average sized parking lot- anywhere, ever. They expected us to believe people could not come out to see Biden himself but they went out to vote for him in high numbers never seen In history- higher than Trumps-which WERE never seen in history.
The democrats were going to do anything to keep him out of the Shite House.
People put way too much past them.
Yes, it is called a repeating pattern of fraud.
Shite House
This Freudian slip autocorrect can be annoying
Thank God Indeed. This is in his hands.
True
I read elsewhere the first and second hand count were almost totally alike.
This must be fixed.
The only way to do that is at the State Level.
The ball is in our court.
Yes
Uhm... I didn’t say I don’t believe it.
I was just commenting.
observing...
60% is more than 50%
If it were 50%, there’s a half chance of there being a tie or some nail biting needed. But with 60% that’s a no brainer. One can just laugh. There is something wrong. Even the village idiot can see it.
It’s not in the interest of the Ruling Class to “fix it.”. It’s all over. Look to your own.
“...IMO is a combination of the cities going blue and vote fraud”
Cities don’t “go blue”....The elections truly are FAR FAR MORE CORRUPT than close..the hysteria over attempts to require voter ID and ballot auditing and accountability are all anyone needs to know about the issue. As PDJT himself says , why does the UniParty (D) have 103 lawyers in Arizona?
The “image’ of the Left as an honest political wing in the USA has been driven by the media-which aid and abet electoral fraud. The media explains how things just happen to be “turning Blue” all the time.
Since 1984 the control of media outlets has dropped from over 50 different organizations to just 6 today. The product of that consolidation is an ILLUSION of a “powerful Left wing”, a MANUFACTURED progressive consensus that has usurped political power it has no business with honestly.
“honest” votes for Biden/the Left/the UniParty were 30-35 million in 2020. At most.
The problems originate in corrupted, local electoral precincts in deep Blue urban centers. These NEED to be cleaned. Nobody desires the dirty job. Part of “redistricting” projects, BTW, is to create regions and social environments permitting unfettered and unhindered Electoral Fraud.
Think parts of cities where Republicans fear to tread. No bipartisan voting observers. If any Republican observers, or even voters show up,they are threatened. This is the beginning process of turning a Red state Purple. Its why they are trying to defund the police in those deep blue cities.
This article provides a glimpse into exactly this process going on in Philadelphia in 2009
https://www.heritage.org/commentary/voter-intimidation-new-black-panther-style
There are more of “us” than “them” A whole lot more
Its all kayfabe. Its what they want you to believe, its what they want you to “feel”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kayfabe
What the left has done, ever since the 1984 Reagan-Mondale blowout - (and Mondale was a “moderate” Democrat!) - is to start electoral fraud programs in the largest states to turn them from Red-to-Purple-to Blue. They realized they had no future otherwise. It started in California and New York.
This last election cycle local Texans managed to turn it around at the precinct level-their RINO Governor not withstanding.
Extreme involvement in your local precincts and making sure paper balloting on ELECTION DAY, with hand counts and recounts in a transparent fashion and setting with open audit trails available to the general public, among other measures-are key.
Its dirty, tough work and initially confrontational with the existing perps. As the above article illustrates, it will be dangerous. But it beats the heck outta the alternatives -which are bearing down like a runaway freight train
The left has focused on corrupting our local electoral process. They focus on the deep urban centers. This process of corruption is very active presently in Georgia, using Atlanta as its base, the last 2 election cycles. The state legislature is doing its best to turn it around down there -but will need the rest of the country’s support to make it stick as the UniParty is bringing all its corporate guns to bear on the issue.
We the People have no future otherwise. These people INTEND to “rule”. And the only way possible for their irrational theories to prevail is fraudulently.
Oh I know You believe it
I was making a point. Texting doesn’t come across the same as talking.
Our own 4Liberty is involved in this recount.
What error rate did they expect? Anything over 0% would be unacceptable.
One might reasonably ask themselves the question: "What is an acceptable error rate when ingesting ballots through a scanner or voting machine?"
It is a good question, and an educated guess might be 1-5% overall. Perhaps 10-20% error rate when there is an intermittent malfunction of some kind, and so on.
In the Antrim County (Michigan lawsuit which looks like it will go nowhere now) the forensic analysis showed an AVERAGE of 68% failure rate from across the entire county, with one district recording a high of 82%.
I don't think this is an accident.
When vote tabulation or ingestion records a failure, those failed ballots are flagged and appear to someone working in the Dominion system in what is known as an adjudication queue.
That means someone has to log into the Dominion Democracy Suite system, go into that electronic queue that holds those thousands of failed or indecipherable scans and...adjudicate them.
They are supposed to click on a ballot image, it enlarges to fill their screen, and they manually mark which candidates should have received the vote off of that failed ballot.
But there is another aspect to this software. You can apparently go into the adjudication queue, select multiple ballots (meaning three or four, a hundred, a thousand, or...all of them in the queue.
Then, after selecting them, you can "Batch Adjudicate" them. That is, you don't have to look at each one individually. You can just click a "Select All" checkbox and assign them all.
I can guess that you might wonder: "Gee...if you do it that way, first, wouldn't they be able to pick up who did that "batch adjudication" in an audit trail? And...if someone does a batch adjudication, how does that work with all the down-ballot votes cast for local politicians, judges, and dog-catchers?"
A normal and reasonable person might scratch their chin and respond "Well...those are good questions."
Because they are.
EVERYTHING. That account could do EVERYTHING from wipe the disk to deleting databases or system and application audit logs.
But even worse...it is said that they had the username and password taped to the front of the monitors where people logged into the Dominion Democracy Suite application. Anyone with physical access to the systems (and I have no doubt that number of people was massive and...unknown.
So anyone...ANYONE who walked by could sit down, log in, have FULL system and application permissions to do EVERYTHING, and also had FULL access to the SQL database which was not password protected (!!!!!) so you can see...this is an abortion of an IT setup. The flaws in security are so wide, and the access so broad and open, that ANYONE could do any of the nasty things listed above, and in the application and system audit logs which would normally show an entry that looks like this, and one could immediately see the individual user performing the adjudication:
11/03/2020 09:53:27 PM ET - USER JONES003 BATCH ADJUDICATED BALLOT 00098549831
11/03/2020 09:53:27 PM ET - USER JONES003 BATCH ADJUDICATED BALLOT 00098820022
11/03/2020 09:53:27 PM ET - USER JONES003 BATCH ADJUDICATED BALLOT 00098332096
But in this bastardized, insecure IT setup, the log would look like this, with an anonymous user and nobody would have any clue who was logged in as user ADJUDICATIONUSER since any Tom, Dickless, or Harriett passing by could sit in the empty chair and login with the USERNAME: adjudicationuser PASSWORD: dominion credentials that are taped on the monitor and have full and anonymous access to the system.
11/03/2020 09:53:27 PM ET - USER ADJUDICATIONUSER BATCH ADJUDICATED BALLOT 00098549831
11/03/2020 09:53:27 PM ET - USER ADJUDICATIONUSER BATCH ADJUDICATED BALLOT 00098820022
11/03/2020 09:53:27 PM ET - USER ADJUDICATIONUSER BATCH ADJUDICATED BALLOT 00098332096
This is not unknown, nor particularly uncommon. There are people who are only interested in the top of the ballot candidate such as President, and they ignore all the others. There are also provisions for "block voting" that is configured on many systems, and the ballots actually have checkboxes that lets a person select all of one party or all of another.
The problem is for the people defrauding the vote, is that these numbers are VERY constant across the elections over years. They can apparently predict to a few percentage points overall what percentage of ballots cast will have only one candidate checked, or how many voters use the "block voting" option.
In this election...it has been my observation in reading the analyses done in various places, that the number of votes cast with only one candidate on the form checked, or "block voting" options are used, are way out of line when compared to prior elections. (This also jibes well with the accurate observation that Biden had no coattails...there were not a lot of down-ballot winners in his own party in the numbers normally seen in elections, and this is also somewhat predictable from election to election, especially in certain voting locations.
Bottom Line: I believe there is a correlation between these error rates, adjudication activities, and the number of ballots with only Biden on them and the block voting option for all Democrats on the ticket.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.