Posted on 02/06/2021 8:03:08 PM PST by bitt
BARACK OBAMA HIMSELF was behind efforts to remove Trump from office. He and Nosey Joe knew about the unconstitutional wiretaps on the Trump campaign.
Bear in mind this is from Norman Eisen, a guy linked through his group CREW to the antisemitic former superdooper secret deep cover CIA agent Valerie Plame who tried to win an election in New Mexico before fizzling. She is a Global Zero unilateral nuclear disarmament dork and the former wife of the late Ambassador Joe Wilson of Niger yellowcake fame:
Washington Post: Denying Election Results Is like Denying Holocaust
12/25/2020, 6:33:05 PM · by E. Pluribus Unum · 72 replies
Breitbart ^ | 25 Dec 2020 | Joshua Klein
In a Washington Post editorial published Wednesday, authors Deborah E. Lipstadt and Norman Eisen argue for the radical comparison of challenging recent election results with denying that a Nazi Holocaust, the “best-documented genocide in the world,” ever occurred. The essay, titled “Denying the Holocaust threatens democracy. So does denying the election results,” makes several comparisons while suggesting how to combat such “denial.” Claiming to have “learned the hard way” to take Holocaust denial seriously, the authors state they have “watched with alarm the birth of another powerful disinformation mythology,” referring to the “false conviction pushed by Trump and his enablers”...
That’s the biggest dog’s breakfast of an article I’ve ever read.
I still have no clue what a “color revolution” is.
The world would be better off if a Patriot mhad a late night conversation with Norm Eisen.
Darren Beattie has warned of Color Revolution for months and you’ll find many videos of him discussing it if you do an internet search. He’s probably one of the first to warn of this.
Read his article here on Revolver News, his website:
https://www.revolver.news/2020/09/transition-integrity-project-is-this-soros-linked-group-plotting-a-color-revolution-against-president-trump/
EXCERPT...
“... First, a quick note on Color Revolutions. A “Color Revolution” in this context refers to a specific type of coordinated attack that the United States government has been known to deploy against foreign regimes, particularly in Eastern Europe deemed to be “authoritarian” and hostile to American interests. Rather than using a direct military intervention to effect regime change as in Iraq, Color Revolutions attack a foreign regime by contesting its electoral legitimacy, organizing mass protests and acts of civil disobedience, and leveraging media contacts to ensure favorable coverage to their agenda in the Western press...”
Thanks. That is a most instructive excerpt. I’m surprised I have not heard of this before.
I’ll definitely read the Revolver article you linked.
Shouldn’t that be “revolution of color”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.