Posted on 07/26/2020 8:32:09 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
And “contribute” to HIV, venereal disease, broken lives, broken families, street prostitution and immorality....among other “contributions.”
“up against the wall and spread ‘em!”
DO NOT, under any circumstances, look this word up. Youre better off not knowing what it means.
= = = = = = = = = = =
Hmm Since you put it like that, can guarantee that the site will freeze up from so many hits...<: <: <:
Don’t throw me in that briar patch...
That was Bob Hope’s fear.
That it would go from prohibition of male on male sodomy to acceptance to promotion to mandatory requirement.
Sodomite bathhouses open, but churches and bible studies closed. California...
BOOM!!!
here is your minimum timeline for this:
The legislation gives the Department of Public Health until January to come up with regulations to allow this, he says.
SF proctologists are excited at the news of more new customers.
But CA is closing down the Churches.
They prefer sleep over the bloody battle to keep our rapidly disappearing freedoms. And to scold the rest of us according to their self-righteousness.
Mandelman: “... and their not getting any kind of health messaging that could be provided in a bathhouse.”
they’re
As the British gentleman said after reading this, “Well bugger me!”.
Mandelman should change his name to something more honest such as “Manhandling Man”.
San Francisco is the first city I want the Red Chinese to “take out” (no pun intended) when they attack us in the future. Want to live long enough to see it do a Cheech and Chong death spiral, i.e. to go “ Up In Smoke”.
That will take care of the rats, politicians (but I repeat myself), communists (again I repeat myself), feminazis, Red Chinese agents/colonies, Marxist-dominated universities and schools, and STD spreaders (includes most of the above).
Sodom and Gomorrah would be jealous of SF if they were still around.
Come on Peking, “drop the big one”, the bomb, not a turd on a SF street.
#10. Re “they can’t use cash, can they”? Well that depends on how they refer to “bucks”.
#12. Re “why not allow sex venues on the job?” Well, that would make Congress a much happier and productive place, but I’m not referring to legislation.
Page-ing Rep. Gary Studds (D-Mass), you are wanted in the cloakroom closet.
Come to think of it, Congress already had something like sex venues on the job. It’s why they had to create a hush slush fund to pay off all their victims.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.