Meet the Parents of ‘QBaby’, Star of the Trump Rally and New QAnon Mascot

Rolling Stone ^

[Hieronymus]

Could somebody please translate the second paragraph into English.

[MNDude]

I’m not sure if it is a Pro or Anti Q story or if there is even anything to support or refute.

It basically claims on the 17th day of the month, POTUS drew attention to a baby wearing a Q onesie, and many people believed it was deliberate.

Is that not accurate?

[Revel]

If that is all you see in that story then you might as well just go watch CNN 24/7.

[Paladin2]

It's Raining Tacos...

[Paladin2]

It's Raining Qbots...

[Paladin2]

It's raining Qbots...

[keving]

When will Muslims hire jews?

[SubMareener]

Since October 28, 2017 a group of people have been posting on first 4chan and now 8chan. They claim to be Donald Trump’s Military Intelligence group, mostly Marines. On 8chan what we call articles here are called “breads” and are limited to 751 replies. So when Q posts it has become known as a “breadcrumb”. The person who sets up the bread is known as a “baker”. This year we learned that many of Q’s crumbs talked about things a year before they would happen. We are now in the season of “habbening”. Q says believing is your choice.

[TexasGator]

“Hey, just posting what Rolling Stone wrote. I’m not advocating either way here.”

You lack of comment speaks loads.

[BenLurkin]

Differentiation of Space
integrating extended EarthTribe evolving-regenerating families,
relatives,
relationships of fractal-octave constant 4D Relativity,
Left/Right felt and comprehended as time’s bilateral passing,
from past regeneratives
toward future confluent regenerators;
from referent experience
through referees of future climate regenerativity assumptions,
as if positive,
letting go of pre-millennial LeftBrain degenerating dominance,
as too Yin-repressive for postmillennial today
to reach notnot YinYin wu wei abundance equivalent with Yang.

[Sapwolf]

That “Q” reminds me of Quisp cereal when I was a kid.

What have I gotten myself into now.

[Hieronymus]

Thanks. That helps a good deal.

[Windflier]

And really one of the most infuriating things about you being allowed to break the rules is that no one can offer evidence against this without also breaking the rules. There can be no defense- No Truth- No proof- because that would break the rules.

Sounds like you need a vacation from Q and politics. You're awful wound up, defending an anonymous poster on the internet.

Seriously -- you don't even know who this person is that you're defending, but you sound like someone's threatened one of your family members.

Really -- unhook for a while. It'll do you good.

[Windflier]

Q says believing is your choice.

Well, that's certainly a relief. I've been told by Qbots that belief in Q is expected of all good conservatives.

I've been so ashamed of my heretical, non-believing self for so long now. Thank you for lifting that burden from my head, friend.

[Lurker]

Qooks.

All of them.

L

[grey_whiskers]

A Beautiful Baby

[bitt]

p

[SubMareener]

Your quite welcome, friend. Anything to help.

[Revel]

Gee... arn’t you upset that this was posted where it was not supposed to be? I guess not, because the article takes your side. If it were pro-Q then you would be barking up a storm. Hypocrisy.

[Windflier]

...the article takes your side. If it were pro-Q then you would be barking up a storm. Hypocrisy.

Huh? You've got me mixed up with someone else. I'm not pro Q in any way.

Good day.