Posted on 09/24/2018 10:38:19 AM PDT by Mr. K
Racist AND anti-Semitic. Aren’t you a peach.
This was posted as a serious question about Dianne Feinstein making a mockery of the SCOTUS review process, and how she clearly understand rules of evidence and needs to be removed for that behavior- before they are emboldened to do it again.
I brought up the Ruth Buzzi will be vacating her post soon, and they would only get worse.
AND they are doing this because they are getting away with it... so they are scaring the crap out of FUTURE SCOTUS picks.
The GOP needs to kick back hard.
Instead of posting a thread why not contact the admin?
Otherwise we’ll just say it’s because they don’t like you
It was not just ‘a comment’
It laid out several topics that i have not heard discussed everywhere about Di Fi, the review process, the FUTURE scotus picks, and how we needed to respond.
I’ve been here long enough to know what is a ‘comment’ on a previous topic, and what is a whole new set of items for consideration.
You know I love you, brah, but such a question and accompanying observation would be best as a comment on existing threads. You could even reasonably spam every related thread with this sort of comment (one comment per thread, of course). I’ve done that myself, when my question or comment didn’t rise to the level of an editorial.
So don’t take it personal. Just recognize that admins have to have a certain content-level to let a thread be. I kinda get it, and I agree with it. Keeps from gumming up the latest-posts feeds.
AND IT WAS BRILLIANT commentary too!
Some folks never learn. This is Jim’s house. We’re just visitors. Be thankful Jim puts up with us.
LOL and notice the title change. I think I see the problem now. LOL LOL LOL!
Admin, note my above post where I say the same thing. :) :) :)
Move along
I love, love, love it when idiot trolls self-identify.
No matter where you posted it, if there was a problem with it from FR, why didn’t you send an email to Fresno to find out the reason? If you didn’t get a retort from them, then you can take it to public forum. But without knowing the reason, and if it is justified as I can’t read your initial two entries to guess, then taking it to public forum is just the same as the libs trying to sell a point to their readers without justification.
If you can produce a reason from FR, and it is not justified, then I will agree with you and have the only thing I can have in this case, consideration of not using FR. But they, unlike the liberal idea of justice, are innocent until..... And they are not tried and found guilty in a forum they do not enter themselves like this.
So if they tell you what’s wrong, and you can correct it, then do so and reenter the thread. You get your entry and they get to post it for other readers. If not, then you can complain.
rwood
Of course, it would have been possible that you would have been ignored so you need vanities to survive.
I don’t have anser for you, but suggest you copy and save info you are submitting for your vanity posts so at least you can have copy of the info you thought so important to post instead of being disappointed if admin chooses not to let it be posted.
“Ruth Buzzi”
Wasn’t she on the regular cast of “Laugh-In”? ;-)
A fire sale on vanities....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.