Posted on 08/22/2018 10:43:47 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Fr. Paul Sullins, Ph.D., Research Associate of the Ruth Institute, Answers Questions on The Clerical Sex Abuse Scandal
Is the current Catholic sex abuse scandal related to homosexuality?
Yes. The current scandal includes mostly revelations about male on male sexual abuse of seminarians, where the victims are adults. These kinds of cases were not even considered in the responses to the 2002 scandal, which was about the criminal abuse of minors.
Was the 2002 scandal also related to homosexuality?
The US Conference of Catholic Bishops commissioned two reports, one in 2004 and in 2011, by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice to study the reported cases of clerical sex abuse from 1950 through 2002 and 2010 respectively. Both reports found that over 80% of the victims were neither girls, nor pre-pubescent children (true pedophilia), but pre-teen and teenage boys. These results clearly indicate that the problem was male on male predation by priests against under-aged boys.
Is there a “homosexual subculture” which exists within certain Catholic institutions?
Yes. In a 2002 survey of a national sample of 1,852 Catholic priests by the Los Angeles Times, 44% responded "yes" when asked if there was a "homosexual subculture in your diocese or religious institute". To the question, “In the seminary you attended, was there a homosexual subculture at the time?” 53% of recently-ordained priests responded “Yes” (reported in Hoge and Wenger, Evolving Visions of the Priesthood, p. 102. Their own concurrent survey yielded 55% “Yes” to the identical question.)
Books by former seminary rector Donald Cozzens and psychologist Richard Sipe have described how such subcultures encourage and cover up sexual misconduct. Predatory priests and superiors can abuse the confessional by grooming victims who confess sexual temptations. Grossly immature priests are clueless about the extent of the harm they are causing. Cozzens, who writes from firsthand experience, relates that sexually active homosocial groups were at times so dominant that heterosexual men felt that they did not fit in, and left the seminary.
Numerous reports from clergy and seminarians ar e coming out worldwide which confirm the existence of networks of homosexually active men who cover for each other.
How has this “subculture” contributed to patterns of abuse within the Church?
Sipe chronicles, from mental health records and public court documents, a culture of denial and cover-up by confessors, spiritual directors, faculty, and senior clerics. Sipes wrote presciently in 2011 about what he called the “Cardinal McCarrick Syndrome.” Powerful clerics, including bishops, escaped exposure and penalty even though everyone knew about their predatory behavior and abuse of power. The sense of entitlement shown by senior clerics to seminarians eerily parallels the situation of Hollywood executives to young actresses and actors.
Pictured: Father McCarrick and James in the 1970s. From the New York Times article.
Do these findings suggest that the time has come for the Church to relax its teaching on homosexual activity?
Actually, the exact opposite is true. These findings do not contradict Catholic teaching. The Church holds that homosexual acts are “intrinsically disordered”, which means they are inherently incapable of fulfilling the purpose of human sex relations, like blindness is inherently incapable of fulfilling the purpose of sight. Further, homosexual acts actively interfere with godliness and human well-being. Though individuals can achieve Christian maturity through chastity, self-denial, and self-control, a homosexual inclination is not a recommendation for Church leadership. In fact, since 2005 Catholic norms have formally prohibited any known homosexual man from being ordained. Honestly, applying these norms consistently would have avoided a tremendous number of problems.
Isn’t it rank hypocrisy on the part of the Catholic Church, which seems to be dominated by homosexually active men, to continue to condemn homosexual practice?
Someone once said, “Hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue.” The failure to live up to the teachings does not prove anything one way or the other about the value of those teachings.
Is allowing priests to marry a potential solution to this problem?
Celibacy is not a scapegoat, and married priests are not a panacea. In my research on married priests, I found that married priests are statistically no less likely to engage in minor sex abuse as are celibate priests. At this point, we need to focus on removing abusers and enablers from positions of power. We can talk about other issues such as the discipline of celibacy once we’ve solved this problem.
In conclusion:
The Ruth Institute believes the facts show that:
About Fr. Sullins-- The Rev. D. Paul Sullins, Ph.D., is a Senior Research Associate of the Ruth Institute. He recently retired as Professor of Sociology at the Catholic University of America, Washington DC. Dr. Sullins is a leader in the field of research on same-sex parenting and its implications for child development. He has written four books, including Keeping the Vow: The Untold Story of Married Catholic Priests, and over 100 journal articles, research reports, and essays on issues of family, faith, and culture.
He was ordained by Cardinal McCarrick in 2002, during the height of the sex abuse crisis of that year. Fr. Sullins feels a profound sense of personal disappointment and betrayal, along with a desire to see holiness and trust restored in our hierarchy.
For interviews with Fr. Sullins, or Jennifer Roback Morse, Ph.D. Founder and President of the Ruth Institute, please email Elizabeth Johnson at media (at) ruthinstitute dot org.
Dr. Ruth?
Well, they knew they were to become seminarians, what did they expect? Seems a pretty seminal choice of term.
In related business, if someone asks us you want to become a ‘castrato’, say No!
There is a deeper cause of this sexual abuse, namely evil. Satan has used the penchant for homosexuality in the clergy as a means to destroy the Church. In addition to purging the Church of homosexuality, there needs to be a spiritual cleansing. Those clergy guilty of these acts should be publically excommunicated, especially the Bishops and Cardinals. The Pope should direct all Catholic churches to conduct special liturgies and prayers to root out evil. The Church as a whole needs exorcism
Sorry, but faggotry has ALWAYS been part of the Catholic Clergy.
I think Pope Francis has been attempting to elevate man-boy love into a social norm.
The church does good things, but current leadership is destroying it. We dont want Islam to fill the faith void.
Kinda like another important institution on the world stage.
You mean the Boy Scouts?
Someone once said, “Hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue.” The failure to live up to the teachings does not prove anything one way or the other about the value of those teachings.
What a weasel non-answer.
The question wasn't about the value of the teachings.
The question was about the behavior in contradiction to the teachings.
And yes, it IS rank hypocrisy.
Starting to sound an awful lot like demoncrats....quit with the excuses and start the house cleaning.
If you look deep enough, many of the founding heroes of the “gay rights” movement were pederasts: Terry Bean (HRC), Harvey Milk, Larry Brinkin, Harry Hay, etc.
I have never had a problem with Catholic Christians as a faith home. I have always had a tremendous problem with the Catholic Church as an institution.
Throughout history, the institution has been the home of great evil.
In the last 50 years, liberalism and faggotry has become rampant.
“Is the current Catholic sex abuse scandal related to homosexuality?
“Yes.”
Such direct honesty sounds sadly strange, but is so refreshing at the same time.
Probably not before 1139AD when marriage of Catholic Priests was forbidden.
Before that, there was no such thing.
Paul was single but knowing Jewish history, most likely Peter was married.
Yes, those men are hypocrites that engaged in homosexual acts or covered for those that abused others. No, the Catholic Church (which is what was asked about) is not hypocritical for condemning such things.
I'm guessing it is a reference to Ruth, an ancestor of Jesus, for whom a book of the Bible is named.
Then he should take the lead by resigning and going off to finish out his life in a cloistered monastery.
Most of their male victims aren't homosexuals, and neither are these monsters. As Red might put it in The Shawshank Redemption, they have to be human first, and they don't qualify.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.