Posted on 07/07/2018 9:34:16 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[FULL TITLE] Yes, It’s True: Peter Strzok Failed His Polygraph Yet Retained Security Clearance and Position on Two Investigations…
I have been asked about this repeatedly:
Paul Sperry @paulsperry_ BREAKING: Strzok himself posed a national security risk while he was investigating Trump & his campaign aides for national security threats. Strzok flunked a 2016 internal polygraph by FBI, yet retained access to TS/SCI classified info & continued to run 2 major espionage probes 4:59 PM - 6 Jul 2018
Validating Paul Sperry’s tweet. Yes, FBI Agent Peter Strzok failed his polygraph and his supervisors were notified on January 16th, 2016, his results were “out of scope“. Meaning he failed his polygraph test. Yet he was never removed from any responsibilities; and against dept policy, he did not have his clearance revoked until he could clear.
This was discussed during the Rosenstein testimony and overlooked by most.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
The question he messed up on was “Was the Hillary Clinton Email scandal fixed?” He said “No.”
What scandal?
He is so smug and despicable.
Just when you think it can’t get any more bizarre and underhanded.
Mr. Magoo, where are you?
To be fair, I thought they weren’t admissible in court due to people being able to spoof them?
Sign the petition:
Spread it around! When it hits 150, it gets moved to the main petition page. Then it will take off. Up to 106 now.
Spoofing it means passing it despite lying during the exam. But this is a case where it did detect lying, so the question becomes, what is the subject matter about which Strzok was untruthful during the exam?
Comey would have to sign off on the clearance after the polygraph.
Corruption, thy name is fill in the blank___________.
5.56mm
“To be fair, I thought they weren’t admissible in court due to people being able to spoof them?”
He wasn’t in court.
Enemies Domestic, the entire bunch, including the top management layer.
So who is empowered to charge and prosecute?
Where should the pressure be applied?
Doing nothing is not an option.
These crimes are as bad or worse than Hillary's hundreds of felonies.Where is the drunken, diseased, Ugly, Fat Cow beach these days anyway?
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Stupid AND short sighted... Lying to the American people is NOT the way to save the institutions... they way to do that is to let the truth come out - THEN MAKE CHANGES ...
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL NEVER TRUST THE FBI OR DOJ IF THEY 'SECURE' OUR TRUST BY 'LYING UNDER OATH' TO US. WE WILL CATCH THEM IN THEIR LIES FOR DECADES... IT WILL BE A SLOW DEATH FOR THE FBI AND DOJ.
Tell the truth - make changes - THEN AND ONLY THEN - MOVE ON...
If I had ever failed or had even a questionable polygraph (full scope) I would NEVER been allowed near an SCI program again.
That said, I think it highly likely that Strzok was improperly protected. As such, his superior(s) immediately become(s) complicit in his malfeasance of office and liable to the same penalties under law.
"Ceterum censeo Islam esse delendam."
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Signed
Yes, where have she and her back brace gone, did she finish her world tour?
Thanks for that....LOL.
From the executive summary:
Almost a century of research in scientific psychology and physiology provides little basis for the expectation that a polygraph test could have extremely high accuracy. Although psychological states often associated with deception (e.g., fear of being judged deceptive) do tend to affect the physiological responses that the polygraph measures, these same states can arise in the absence of deception. Moreover, many other psychological and physiological factors (e.g., anxiety about being tested) also affect those responses. Such phenomena make polygraph testing intrinsically susceptible to producing erroneous results. This inherent ambiguity of the physiological measures used in the polygraph suggests that further investments in improving polygraph technique and interpretation will bring only modest improvements in accuracy.
Polygraph research has not developed and tested theories of the underlying factors that produce the observed responses. Factors other than truthfulness that affect the physiological responses being measured can vary substantially across settings in which polygraph tests are used. There is little knowledge about how much these factors influence the outcomes of polygraph tests in field settings. For example, there is evidence suggesting that truthful members of socially stigmatized groups and truthful examinees who are believed to be guilty or believed to have a high likelihood of being guilty may show emotional and physiological responses in polygraph test situations that mimic the responses that are expected of deceptive individuals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.