Skip to comments.Devin Nunes just screwed everything up. The Deep State walks!
Posted on 05/06/2018 6:18:06 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
Deputy AG Rod Rosenstein and AG Jeff Sessions are working hand-in-hand on dismantling the Deep State.
Deep State corruption is deep and embedded. No normal investigation is going to cut it.
Enter The Donald.
Critics of Sessions need to understand that Sessions is a prosecutor in the traditional, Wyatt Earp sense.
He doesn't camera hog
He rarely gives press releases, media interviews, or conferences.
He does the work diligently behind the scenes.
Why (Nicolas Cage from the movie "The Rock" here) IN ZEUS' BUTTHOLE! is Sessions all of a sudden a Deep State mole, when for years he's been a distinguished Senator and on the front lines on the illegal alien immigration front and was the first elected official to endorse Trump?
Oh, he endorsed Trump as part of a nefarious plot. Yeah right. Sessions bashers need to take their meds.
As the resident Sessions' butt-kisser here (In before the Sessions bashers), Sessions is doing his part in taking apart the Swamp albeit by other boulevards.
- Rosenstein was granted full immunity.
- The corruption is so embedded and thick that a normal prosecution wasn't going to cut it. Ergo, Rosenstein was hired by Trump to prosecute the Deep State because to fight corruption, you've got to use a corrupt figure so the bad guys won't know.
So what does Devin Nunes do?
"Durka durka durka...let's threaten Sessions!" Nevermind that this is going to throw all of the hard work that Sessions have done since mid-2017 into naught.
What makes you think Sessions is "doing nothing?"
Sessions is investigating Obama/Clinton treason.
- The Body Count
- The Iranian/Hezabollah opiod connection
- Fast and Furious
- Obama's legitimacy as a Natural Born Citizen?
You mean-old right-wing FReepers (I say this tongue-in-cheek) really think Sessions is sleeping and not doing a damn thing?
Do you know that Sessions saw to it that a Klansman's case was completed and was executed?
Sessions is the greatest AG to ever serve a President.
By the end of May, the hammer will drop. You heard it hear first. Now, go ahead and post that Granny pic out of anger and frustration.
Isn’t it time Trump fill the vacant Attorney General position?
Post #16 lolol
You don’t need an anonymous Queer to tell you which way the wind blows.
Is this rave review from the onion?
THERE IT IS! THE GRANNY PIC!!
If he indicted Hillary, for even mishandling secret documents, tomorrow I might buy into your theory. That is a proven case, even Comey said she was guilty, but that her intent was not malicious. But malicious or not it is still a crime. No, I am afraid that Sessions has had more than enough time to bring at least that indictment, but he hasn’t.
Dude...you took the blue pill.
You were supposed to take the red pill.
Wonder when Trump is going to fill that empty AG position?
Red is for Commies, politically speaking.
Is LS peddling this bullshit to you?
Extremely Extreme Extremist is actually the secret alias for Jeff Session’s mother. I could prove it, but that is hidden in a sealed document. If unsealed, the proof would be heavily redacted. — I am practicing for a deep state job.
“Is the Kool-Aid you drink legally available?”
I have to agree. That is some seriously bad Kool-Aid the EEE is drinking. It might be the same stuff that Jim Jones used.
W T F
This is one of the stupidest vanity posts I've ever seen here, if not the stupidest.
Too bad it's not an opus.
One by one, these theories have gone down in flames in the face of overwhelming evidence. For example: James Comey? The half-baked theories promoting him as a "white hat" were never backed up by anything more than wishful thinking and "He can't be as dumb/corrupt/partisan as he appears" "reasoning." The jury is in: James "Jimmy the Weasel" Comey IS every bit as stupid, corrupt, and partisan as he appeared to be. Maybe even more so.
Robert Mueller? There are still holdouts, but again, there is very little other than wishful thinking and a chain-of-goodness that proclaims that he's anything other than a scumbag. The chain-of-goodness argument goes like this: He was appointed by Rosenstein, who was appointed by Sessions, who was appointed by Trump. Therefore, he must be a white hat.
On the other side of the ledger we have this:
Rod Rosenstein? If you think Rosenstein is a white hat, why did he appoint Mueller? Why has he withheld information from the various congressional committees? And before you tell me "muh... ongoing investigations," compare the latest round of recently unredacted testimony from the HPSCI from James Comey with the original, heavily redacted "classified" testimony. The ONLY differences is that the fully exposed testimony makes it clear that James Comey and Andrew McCabe are LIARS and contains NO -- I repeat NO -- sensitive national security or sources and methods redactions. NOT. ONE.
So riddle me this? If Rosenstein is a "good guy" why would be he withholding testimony that has no bearing on anything being done either by the IG or Huber, the sole reason for which was that it embarrassed DOJ/FBI? In fact, in embarrassed at least one FBI executive who was already fully, publicly, disgraced: Andrew McCabe. So why hide it?
I would also ask you to take a look at who Rosenstein's wife is, and who her clients have been over the years if you still think he's a white hat actor.
It's true that Rosenstein hasn't yet proven himself to be a skunk. Unlike Mueller, Comey, and most of the previous top people at DOJ and FBI, he hasn't yet revealed himself as a scumbag. But... he does have a number of dark marks and the only bright one is "he was appointed by Sessions."
I don't think Sessions is crooked. But I think the pool of career people he had to pick from at FBI/DOJ was very small, and based on what they've done, I don't see a lot of room for hope. We also don't really see much evidence that Huber is doing much of anything. Is it really possible that corruption on the scale we know existed within the DOJ could be investigated without any leaks from Huber, his office, or a grand jury? I must say I'm skeptical.
I'd love for you to be right. But, given what we know, there is very little reason to believe that things are anything other than what they appear, and the history we have to date tells us that all the clever theories about super-secret good-guys weeding corruption at the DOJ have--so far--been proven to be inane nonsense.
The difference between inference and implication.
Perhaps there are no leaks because the media refuses to leak bad stuff about the Deep State being in Deep S*^t. Perhaps those that Horowitz/Huber have interviewed understand (and sign an agreement) that should they leak anything about the investigation, any plea deal will be null and void and they will go to prison. Perhaps the DOJ doesn’t want to release info to Congress because Congress is a leaking cesspool and will jeopardize the investigation(s).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.