Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

April 19 in Military History: the Shot Heard Round the World and the first flight of the Intruder
Unto the Breach ^ | April 19, 2018 | Chris Carter

Posted on 04/19/2018 2:08:50 PM PDT by fugazi

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: DoodleDawg

Encouraging him further off the ledge I see.

Carry on! ;’}


41 posted on 04/20/2018 7:00:37 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Do you truly doubt that the Founding Fathers would not have fought to the death to prevail?

You naively think that will power is the only necessity for victory. You should read about the Spartans at Thermopylae.

When one side has so much more people to throw at you, you are going to get vanquished, unless you have some sort of substantial leverage to even the odds.

No. The Founding fathers would have all been killed had George III decided to send his full force against them. We must thank his forbearance more than anything else.

They were, after all, fighting for their liberty which seems to me to be a far greater motivator than fighting for slavery.

So were the Confederates. They already had slavery, and Lincoln repeatedly told them over and over again, "If you like your slavery, you can keep your slavery", so "slavery" wasn't even on the table as a motivation for either side. The North claiming it was about slavery was just another propaganda effort to dehumanize the other side in the manner the US Government attempted to dehumanize the Germans in WWI.

The Confederates were also fighting for their liberty, but they just didn't have enough men to oppose someone who had four times their population.

42 posted on 04/20/2018 7:09:51 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
Demo-cracy means means the "Demos" (Common People) are the rulers.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/democracy

Replacing the word "Demo" with "Slave" makes the word mean that the slaves are the rulers.

It's logically incorrect, but of course I don't think you care. It gives you another opportunity to introduce the word "slave" in the conversation.

In the manner that pro-abortion people cannot help themselves in introducing the word "choice" in a conversation, so too can people who very badly want to believe that their side is justified, cannot help but try to introduce the word "slave" into every conversation on the subject.

43 posted on 04/20/2018 7:18:11 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I didn’t invent the term, numbnutz:

Plantocracy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A plantocracy, also known as a slavocracy,[1] is a ruling class, political order or government composed of (or dominated by) plantation owners.

A number of early European colonies in the New World were largely plantocracies, usually consisting of a small European settler population relying on a predominantly West African chattel slave population (as well as smaller numbers of indentured servants, both European and non-European in origin), and later, freed Black and poor white sharecroppers for labour. These plantocracies proved to be a decisive force in the anti-abolitionist movement.

So are you now going to complain that plantocracies means plants ruling the world?!


44 posted on 04/20/2018 7:27:03 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
I didn’t invent the term, numbnutz:

Doesn't mean it wasn't invented. And incorrect at it's inception.

45 posted on 04/20/2018 7:33:23 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

BTW: your source legitimizes the term Slavocracy too (note the date):

slavocracy (n.)

also slaveocracy, in U.S. history, “the political dominance of slave-owners,” 1840, formed irregularly from slave (n.) + -cracy “rule or government by.” Related: Slavocrat.


46 posted on 04/20/2018 7:35:59 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
Yes, it notes it was formed "irregularly", around 1840. It was no doubt created by Northern abolitionists as a derogatory directed at the South, for the same reasons I mentioned above; So that they can introduce the word "slave" into the conversation.

Same pursuit of political advantage, different century.

47 posted on 04/20/2018 8:00:59 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

It’s a legitimate term that has been a part of the discussion for almost 180 years. Get over it.


48 posted on 04/20/2018 8:05:46 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
It’s a legitimate term that has been a part of the discussion for almost 180 years. Get over it.

As legitimate as "anti-choice", which has been part of the discussion since 1973.

49 posted on 04/20/2018 8:08:30 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
Encouraging him further off the ledge I see.

Something I will no doubt live to regret.

50 posted on 04/20/2018 8:12:39 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

In the scheme of things he’s like a mosquito bite on an elephants ass. What else can one expect from a guy who probably thinks that plutocracies only occur on Pluto?


51 posted on 04/20/2018 8:20:02 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: fugazi
The Revolution almost touched off in Salem in February of ‘75. The British backed down for time being but a Miss Sarah Tarrant almost got it going again with her mouth after a trooper pointed a musket at her. Paraphrasing now in modern parlance “You don't scare us MF’er pull the trigger if you got the balls which you don't “

Cooler heads prevailed and the Brits withdrew. http://www.womenhistoryblog.com/2009/04/sarah-tarrant.html
https://historicipswich.org/2014/07/05/leslies-retreat-or-how-the-revolutionary-war-almost-began-in-salem/

52 posted on 04/20/2018 8:36:37 AM PDT by Polynikes ( Hakkaa palle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Polynikes

Interesting chronicle!


53 posted on 04/20/2018 8:57:10 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Something I will no doubt live to regret.

I wouldn't enjoy getting my @$$ handed to me in a debate either. Fortunately it is not something I have had to worry about.

54 posted on 04/20/2018 9:20:52 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
I wouldn't enjoy getting my @$$ handed to me in a debate either.

LOL! Fortunately I don't have to worry about that with you.

55 posted on 04/20/2018 9:50:27 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
LOL! Fortunately I don't have to worry about that with you.

So long as you stay in your "safe space" of denial. :)

56 posted on 04/20/2018 10:06:36 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Nice to always have your own version of history, isn’t it? And reality.


57 posted on 04/20/2018 11:21:40 AM PDT by jmacusa ("Made it Ma, top of the world!'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
Nice to always have your own version of history, isn’t it? And reality.

You are mistaken. That is an example of *your* version of Civil War history applied to the founders. It focuses on and emphasizes all the wrong things about the conflict.

58 posted on 04/20/2018 11:24:03 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
What else can one expect from a guy who probably thinks that plutocracies only occur on Pluto?

Hey, you notice this thing about the word "Plutocrat"? It isn't "irregular." Meaning it is put together in the correct manner, unlike your "slaveocracy" which was invented as a piece of political propaganda.

59 posted on 04/20/2018 11:29:07 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Now that I see how much it gets your panties in a bunch I pledge to use it more often.

Slaveocracy!


60 posted on 04/20/2018 2:01:39 PM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson