Posted on 12/28/2017 8:20:15 AM PST by Louis Foxwell
Edited on 12/28/2017 8:27:52 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
Front Page mag - A Project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center
Daniel Greenfield Ping List Notification of new articles.
I am posting Greenfield's articles from FrontPage and the Sultan Knish blog. FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Greenfield ping list.
The Point is a collection of short articles posted on FrontPageMag by Greenfield on current topics. I recommend an occasional look at the Sultan Knish blog. It is a rich source of materials, links and more from one of the preeminent writers of our age.
FrontPage is a basic resource for conservative thought.
Lou
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.
To get on or off the Greenfield ping list please reply to this post or notify me by Freepmail.
Yeah. It isn’t bullets....yet.
But, the dumbazzes are pushing it though.
The bag limit on lawyers really needs to be removed.
Lawyers, like other rats, are a scourge on society.
He nails the core of the struggle.
Fantastic article. Trump is the first beachhead attack into the capital since Reagan. Hopefully he can hold, and even extend his position, but the swamp is deep, and he's already been betrayed by some of his own appointees. It's important that we fight even harder than we have so far, after being given this rare opportunity. Call your Congressmen, and let them know whose side you're on, and that you don't consider the battle nearly won yet. The battle is actually just finally being joined.
The same goes for most of the MSM.
If it comes to bullets their side is it going to be very happy
our side has all the bullets all the ammo and all the training
so Democrats better watch out that her play to game right or they will end up dead in the street
Nuff sed
His appointees saw how powerful the deep state is. Some chose to fight it with Trump. Others believe it’s too powerful to defeat so they chose to join it.
The bag limit on lawyers really needs to be removed.
Lawyers, like other rats, are a scourge on society.
If you look at most of our nation’s problems, too many extremist liberal lawyers (many become judges).
It doesn’t matter the subject. Crime? So many get arrested again and again. Our courts are a joke. They protect the criminals. There is no longer a “justice system.” It has become nonsense. Healthcare? You name it? Lawyers are a drain on our society.
DC is a bunch of non-productive types costing us trillions while living off what liberal lawyers have created.
Brilliant and concisely written.
How the Left must hate him.
Doing healthcare reform without tort reform is just...stupid.
p
This column needs to be read in the House of Representatives at the same time that articles of impeachment are submitted to remove Derrick Watson.
What is now happening in the judicial system poses a grave threat to our system of government. Dishonest, agenda driven lawyers and judges are our Achilles heal.
I agree. I am particularly incensed at reading “The 9th Circuit Court today issued an injunction against the President’s order...”
He did nail it.
“The Mueller investigation has to be seen in the context of a battle between the democratic powers of the people to choose their own representatives and the lawyers who actually run the government”
This is the core of it. Mueller is part of a conspiracy which was outraged that Trump would have the temerity to think that he could dislodge one of them - a permanent upper class of bureaucratic elites for whom “the law” is merely a tool in their box of control.
That is what they are doing to Trump now: using “the law” in a way that it was never intended to by the Anglo-Protestant founders of the federal union. Not to achieve justice in the case of a real crime but merely as a tool of coercion to deprive their political enemies of power.
Everything that 800 years of legal evolution from the Magna Carta was supposed to have driven out.
This is all evident now from the exposition of the conspiracy within the FBI but which we could all see by the tolerance of Clinton’s own behavior. Comey was the lead conspirator and should have been fired on 21 January 2017 at 0800.
That Trump waited was his own unfamiliarity with the government and the reasonable notion of wanting to have a fig leaf of internal investigation before doing what he KNEW had to be done: get the chief threat to him out of his administration.
We cannot wait for this to play out by tolerating it. That’s their game. Trump and his real allies must stop playing it. He knows that. But he must act soon. Mueller has already discerned that he is somewhat invulnerable, that they can play the threat of impeachment every time someone points out that he’s got nothing and indicting yet more people for obscure paperwork “crimes” isn’t going to change that. Mueller needs to be disabused of this notion of invulnerability, and we start with Rod Rosenstein for that: he was responsible for this, and he let it cross all legal boundaries, so he has to be dismissed and a neutral manager be put in place.
It’s either that or this will devolve into actual shooting, because the government will be seen as a farce.
Ask Senator Steve Scalise if it’s just a word war.
He is certainly that and more. President Trump is The Echo of Our Framers' Uncorrupted President.
But they pick and choose where to resist. The problem is not resisting federal government power, but resisting Trump's efforts to scale back federal government intervention in everything. That is what many of the lawsuits concern. These are not Sharif Arpaios trying to uphold the law, but to use judicial activism to overturn rule of law.
f its legal gambit fails, the left will default fully to mass protests, street violence and terrorism
Like the march on Washington from Charlotesville?
It is ironic that Gandhi's success and Mandela's success were in large measure the result of judges who followed British common law precepts. Here in the U.S. we want to dispose of that common law. A further irony, for those who are fans of Scalia is that Scalia was not a big fan of the common law, preferring statutory law. He was much more of an authoritarian than a genuine conservative. It's the difference between the Napoleonic Code and US Constitutionalism - a heritage we are doing all we can to forget.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.