Clearances “Forged;” Granted Access to Congressional Intel Despite Falsified Vetting

https://truepundit.com/fbi-awans-security-clearances-forged-granted-access-to-congressional-intel-despite-falsified-vetting/ ^

[rawcatslyentist]

Forged ID’s, no security checks? How presidential of them.

[Ouderkirk]

Hillary Clinton’s lesbian concubine is, by all accounts, Huma Abedin. They basically live together, and have for years, even sleeping together when on the road. Huma Abedin was literally Hillary Clinton’s Monica Lewinsky analogue at exactly the same time in the late 90’s. Abedin was placed in the White House as an intern to Hillary in 1996, and they have been together ever since.

Huma Abedin was in a totally, 100% FAKE marriage to the single most repulsive, odious, embodying-every-possible-negative-stereotype-about-Jews Jew, Carlos Danger himself, “The Mongoose”, Anthony Weiner. The Clintons and Abedin reckoned that if Abedin married the biggest negative-stereotypical Jew on the surface of the earth, and presumably bred with him (check), that if anyone dared question Abedin’s agenda vis-a-vis the islamic political system, she could point to her “husband”, Anthony Weiner, and say, “Look, I married and had a child with the single most repellant Jew on the surface of this or any other planet. Do you really think I’m a musloid extremist?”

And this would work in perpetuity, even when Abedin divorced Weiner (which was pretty much a foregone conclusion.) Even now, even with Weiner being exposed as a super-perv, Abedin can still now and forevermore point to her fake “marriage” to Weiner to prove that she isn’t “that kind of musloid”.

Oh, and by the way, you know who “officiated” at the Abedin-Weiner wedding, don’t you?

William. Jefferson. Clinton.

[Steely Tom]

One thing about clearances is that there is a paper trail.

I bet it's gone. An accidental bureaucratic snafu. The system failed. Ho hum.

[AppyPappy]

“Why is this not the biggest story of the year?”

Because Democrats

[Delta 21]

Yup. And Chelsea Clinton sure is ugly.

[Grampa Dave]

More evidence that the FBI does not work for the good Americans.

[Boogieman]

Let’s just say it plainly: Debbie Wasserman-Schultz probably broke federal law and compromised national security because she wanted her favorite “diversity” picks to be able to work for her and her buddies, even if they might have had a few terrorist connections.

[Boogieman]

“One thing about clearances is that there is a paper trail. Someone approved and singed off on them. WHO?”

What does that matter? We know that Samantha Power “signed off” on the illegal unmasking of people in the Trump campaign who were illegally under surveillance, based on warrants obtained with fraudulent evidence. Apparently all she had to do was say “But I didn’t do it!” and the paper trail means nothing. Nobody will investigate it, much less prosecute.

[tinamina]

Where’s the baby? Jordan, Ibe.ieve his name is.

[XEHRpa]

> Because it’s obvious click-bait BS that relies on anonymous “FBI insiders” saying “I seriously doubt...” to back up its silly claims.

I think you are mistaken. True-Pundit has been ahead of a number of stories this year. Should definitely be taken as “put on the watch list.”

[hal ogen]

They were hired by TRAITORS. The TRAITORS should be arrested, given a fair trial...and when found, guilty, hanged.

[hal ogen]

Are there no Patriots in the halls of justice?

[XEHRpa]

> Are there no Patriots in the halls of justice?

I am sure they are there. The bad guys are already being rolled up. How many DOJ executives have already been relieved of duty? Eight, I think I’ve heard (reassignment is the first step to prosecution, because of the Civil Service rules protecting their employment; I am confident Sessions will not let it stop at reassignment; an example must be made for future would-be Swamp creatures). There are also lower ranks being affected. DOJ had 4000+ sealed indictments in Nov, more than 4x the past “record.”

Just remember one must have ironclad evidence before dropping the hammer on a criminal of this category, since they have tried to cover their tracks and are not stupid. Also, tactics may require that you roll things up in a particular sequence.

It is clear that while everyone has been looking at Mueller’s muh Russia, that is just the squirrel to distract. The real work has been done through the various Inspector Generals (DOJ, State) that have been unshackled this past year to do their job. I am confident that Sessions has been driving this spearhead. Rumor is it will come to fruition in the next two weeks or so.

[hal ogen]

That would make my day. Patience is a virtue.

[XEHRpa]

Here is the scoop on DOJ IG Horowitz (how he got the job)

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/942227779579498496.html

and the follow-up:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/940033552577544192.html

We also learned that Hillary declined to be interviewed by the DoState IG (google it).

[Sir Napsalot]

This is based on the OIG report on June 4, 2014 - "Our audit fieldwork was conducted from August 26, 2013 through December 2, 2013, at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management’s (OPM) headquarters located in Washington, D.C.; ...."

And this RED FLAG never went anywhere. ===>

"Abnormal Number of Reviews

Two USIS reviewers completed an abnormally high number of reviews on background investigations in a short timeframe. For example, one of the reviewers completed 15,152 background investigations reviews during a one month timeframe, with most of these occurring within minutes of each other on multiple days."

Are the companies ("Contractors") a set up phony operation to rubber stamp all of the requests? Was Obama and Obama admin trying to hire criminals (for example, ACORN operatives) and expand government bureaucracy to compensate for his miserable 'Laser Focused on Jobs, Jobs, Jobs'? Was Awan brothers specifically obtained the clearance during this period?

Lots of questions could have been asked, but I don't recall seeing this report making any head waves at any time since its release.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

This Freedom of the Press thingie is NOT working!

Trump gets spied on, investigated, etc., yet nada about this ion MSM.

Freedom of the presses would work, and is the only thing that would. Freedom of a singular press, OTOH . . .

The reason our press is singular cannot be unseen, once seen - it is out there in plain sight. SCOTUS recognized it in 1945, but

• the issue before the court was limited, and

• the perpetrator of the problem, then and now, was then - but is no longer - too big to fail.

 

People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices. It is impossible indeed to prevent such meetings, by any law which either could be executed, or would be consistent with liberty and justice. But though the law cannot hinder people of the same trade from sometimes assembling together, it ought to do nothing to facilitate such assemblies; much less to render them necessary. - < Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations

Do people of the “trade” of journalism "meet together" enough to lead to "a conspiracy against the public?” Absolutely. The Associated Press newswire is a continuous virtual meeting of its member journalistic institutions, of which “the MSM is constituted. That meeting has been going on continually since before the Civil War.

What would be the signs of this conspiracy? Quite simply, the conspiracy would enable journalists to avoid ideological competition amongs themselves, leading to the utter dominance of the inherent bias of journalism over the ideology of news reporting.

The ideology of news reporting is that journalism is important, and journalism is reliable. That is, journalism is objective. And yet,

• nobody can be objective all the time, or know when they are objective. So the claim of objectivity is inevitably arrogant. Furthermore,

• journalists all know (“If it bleeds, it leads”) that journalism is negative. Thus the claim of journalistic objectivity amounts to the conceit that “negativity is objectivity." But since “the conceit that 'negativity is objectivity'” is entirely servicable as a definition of cynicism, journalism’s claim of objectivity is an admission of cynicism.

Nobody can be cynical about everything; if “A” and “B” are opposites, cynicism toward “A” perforce suggests faith in “B.” And so it is with the cynicism of journalism; journalism is cynical about society - and that leads directly to faith in - indeed, naiveté towards - government (in the first two paragraphs of Common Sense Thomas Paine draws the contrast between “society” and “government”).

AP journalism is a monopoly which produces homogenous journalism. The result is a propaganda of cynicism towards society and naivete towards government - precisely what is seen in any brand of socialism. The AP was “too big to fail” when its nominal mission of the economical distribution of national news nationwide required news services which could conserve expensive telegraphy bandwidth. In the Internet Age, "expensive telegraphy bandwidth” has quite a musty sound to it. It is one thing to complain that the intenet can spread a lie around the world in a trice. It is another to say that the AP has been doing that job for generations, without competiton until the Internet transformed the propaganda landscape.

The natural disposition is always to believe. It is acquired wisdom and experience only that teach incredulity, and they very seldom teach it enough. The wisest and most cautious of us all frequently gives credit to stories which he himself is afterwards both ashamed and astonished that he could possibly think of believing.

The man whom we believe is necessarily, in the things concerning which we believe him, our leader and director, and we look up to him with a certain degree of esteem and respect. But as from admiring other people we come to wish to be admired ourselves; so from being led and directed by other people we learn to wish to become ourselves leaders and directors . . .

The desire of being believed, the desire of persuading, of leading and directing other people, seems to be one of the strongest of all our natural desires. - Adam Smith, Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759)

It is vain to think that we will ever have a single, reliable, journalism which can be trusted. There is only the possibility of digging the truth out of competing claims of multiple, independent journalisms. A possibility which the Internet presently enables, but which monopoly “objective” journalism, with its Democrat allies, is only too eager to suppress.

[Chode]

boy 0bama couldn't pass a security check but that dint stop him either

[SteveH]

Dws deep state bump