Posted on 08/07/2017 10:37:42 AM PDT by impetrio1
As we're in Slutwalk month, we'll all again be told women can dress as provocatively as they want, act as provocatively as they want, and if anything bad happens as a result, the woman is never to be blamed.
Sorry, but a black person would be kinda' foolish to attend a Klan rally. If he or she did and got an ass-whuppin', there would be many people who'd think attending was a rather stupid idea. Everyday on social media we see women portraying themselves in ways that, as Bill Clinton said, have that "come hither look" and we unfortunately see those provocative images after something bad happens to them.
(Excerpt) Read more at blackandblondemedia.com ...
They cant be responsible, democrats have made it clear that women have no agency
If you want to really piss a Conservative Woman off, tell her she is entitled.
What! No way. Low blow to we individual types.
Freegards
We all know she’s whacko. She’s also talented. We must all acknowledge both, not just one.
The REAL whako is David Crosby. Fired from the Byrds. Nash won’t have anything to do with him after standing by him during his drug episodes. Lucky to be alive with someone else’s liver. Spent time in prison. CSNY is through because of him. And to think that 2 lessbo singers took his sperm donation. THAT’S worse!
Outside of her music, I know nothing about Hynde.
However, women are generally aroused through physical touch and it is appropriately improper, and illegal, to touch women in a grouping manner.
On the other hand, men, mostly unlike women, are generally aroused through visual images. So why is it appropriate for women to dress provocatively with absolutely no impunity? Why are women allowed to grope men visually?
Women, and men, are generally repulsed to see a man wear nothing but a Speedo, yet most everyone on some level finds a woman in a bikini provocative. If women didn’t fully understand this they would not dress revealingly without purpose.
Pretty hard for a man to dress “provocatively”, so again, why do women get a complete pass for knowingly dressing in a manner that intentionally provokes?
The writing at this blog is awful. Just stop.
Hooey. In early last century, the only women who wore
make-up were hookers. Artificially red lips and flushed
cheeks imitate the look of sexual arousal. It’s all meant
to entice. So should women give up make-up altogether?
If there are no-go areas for women, what does it say about
our culture? Men can’t control themselves? If you said,
“Apparently not. Every man is a potential rapist,” then
Islam has a deal for you. The Muslim male is so afraid
of having lustful thoughts, thereby condemning his soul,
he forces women into burkhas, hijabs, and out of sight.
This looks like a new skirmish in the war on masculinity.
Men are so bad, women should be obscene and not heard.
If you’re white, walking down Martin Luther King Boulevard in your nearest city after dark, and you get mugged, the thugs are 100% responsible for their crime. However, you are also a moron for doing something unnecessarily dangerous.
If you’re female, walking down a dangerous street at the wrong time, and you get raped, the predator is 100% responsible for his crime. However, you are also a moron for doing something unnecessarily dangerous.
There are evil people in the world. We are individually responsible for doing everything reasonable to reduce the risk from their evil. That doesn’t mean women should not go to parties, but it does mean it is reckless to get blackout drunk at a party where you don’t know someone who will look out for you. Predators are individually responsible for their actions too, and I hope to see rapists behind bars for a century - but even the longest prison sentence doesn’t undo the rape. Women need to stick with others who will look after them, and they need to be sensible, and so do men although in slightly different ways.
We all know she’s whacko. She’s also talented.
Sometimes I think it’s God’s interesting form of justice: He forms them crazy, but that same crazyness is what allows them to create something people will pay for.
Just don’t take seriously anything they say outside of the stuff you pay for.
See Post #5.
bkmk
Spoken like a man. I’d love men to be in tight swim undies. I mean, if I thought it was decent enough in public.
Nobody should be sexual in public, as a matter of decency with children about. But in private, sure!
Right.
Same with the nuts who go touring in Iran and NK. Yes, they are bastards, but exactly that reason is why one should not venture in.
Why are you all attacking her here? Even the headline makes it clear the woman took responsibility (maybe too much). That makes her persona-non-grata with the feminazis.
I was just attacking the concept of creative people also being crazy. The two really do tend to go hand in hand. I’ve seen quite a bit of it.
It’s similar to the women who are great in bed are also crazy meme. I remember a nationally syndicated radio talk show host talking about it a few years ago.
I could be wrong about this, I may be mixing her up with another singer, but I seem to remember Chrissy writing an autobiography in the last year or two where she essentially took full responsibility for a lot of bad things that happened to her early on. And she basically told her fans they should do the same. She really took a lot of flack for her statements in the book.
What is this?
A Sharia law post?
This sounds like the logic that many Islamic refugees in Europe use.
No you cant attack them, especially if they are NOT breaking the law by doing those things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.