Posted on 07/12/2017 7:46:34 AM PDT by sickoflibs
Last night on MSNBC each show had on Democrat legal experts making the case that the Trump campaign just admitted to breaking federal law.
Brian Williams pointed out on his show (as did Britt Hume did on FNC ) that there is no law against collusion, before getting the following legal opinions:
That the Trump campaign committed conspiracy to commit a crime which is a crime itself.
That the crime they committed conspiracy to commit was to violate of campaign finance law.
That they made an attempt to get a foreign campaign contribution from the foreign state Russia.
What was the (potential) campaign contribution from Russia to the Trump campaign?
It was negative information about Hillary Clinton.
Yep, that Don JRs willingness to receive information negative on Hillary, maybe even evidence that she committed crimes, was itself a crime. (How about positive info?)
Lastly they say it was a crime even if Don JR never got that information from this Russian women.
That just talking to a foreign national about Hillary was a crime: conspiracy.
As a reference VOX makes this exact case here in writing.
Legal experts say Donald Trump Jr has just confessed to a federal crime (VOX Jul 11, 201)
Anyone here see any flaws in their case?
Now Donald AND his son are living in their heads rent free. :)
They say that anyone Trump knows talking to any foreign national about Hillary was a crime.
LoL.
Dems legal case on Trump, they claim its open and shut now.
That the Trump’s just admitted guilt to a crime.
Thought it be fun to mark this in case Trump is still POTUS at years end.
sorry, I mean #3
Why do cops wait to bust a drug deal until money changes hands?
So if that Russian women gave Don JR a list of crimes that Hillary committed and where to find the evidence of them would that have made what Don did a crime?
If somebody handed you a bag of heroin, would that be a crime?
Probably trying for a cover up/ perjury issue.
Jr almost fell into a trap with his different stories but negated the attempt by just releasing emails
Yes, I was listening to a guy say that Jr was talking to “the Russians”. No. I was talking to people that happen to be russian. They were not “the” Russians.
The whole thing is actually comical. No laws were broken, nothing unethical was done. But since someone was Russian, it’s news. Russians are allowed to talk to americans and americans are allowed to talk to russians.
And then there is the first amendment. You know, the free speech thing.
If ever there was a “no there, there” issue, this is it.
“If somebody handed you a bag of heroin, would that be a crime?”
You really can’t be this dense....
.
[snip]This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its governments support for Mr. Trump, Goldstone wrote to Trump Jr. If its what you say I love it, he replied.
How many people say, "Bless your little heart"?
Please send the smart phone app Idioms for Idiots to VOX.
Bingo you got it,
Recall the Citizen's United SCOTUS decision that Obama and these other libs whined about?
Free speech.
How can a $$$ value be assessed on information on Hillary's sleazy dealings as a contribution?
Its idiotic.
Thanks!
You get the point!
Sure he can.
So, republicans attempting to gather differing opinion information on a political opponent "violates" the proglib comrats who are then forced to attack republicans in their self defense and it is illegal to try to stop them?
.
This is the case they are making, and that Don Jr's admissions and emails convict him(and the whole Trump 2016 campaign) of conspiracy to find out more about Hillary's sleazy and possible illegal dealings.
McCain and Graham seem pretty upset about it.
Joe Scarbouro just quit the GOP over it.
Well, they can prove it by just following Joe out the door...
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.