Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Satellite powering technology makes power stations more efficient (Graphene finally being used)
Digital Journal ^ | March 11, 2017 | Tim Sandle

Posted on 03/11/2017 2:54:39 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Researchers have successfully used graphene to reinvent abandoned heat energy converter technology and to make it more efficient. This will be used to boost the output from older power stations.

Power station efficiency has been substantially increased by utilizing satellite-powering technology that was abandoned many years ago. The technology has been reconfigured to function with traditional power stations to aid the conversion of heat to electricity (what’s called thermionic energy conversion) more efficiently. In better news for the environment, this means lower amounts of fossil fuel will be needed to be burnt to produce equivalent amounts of power.

Much of the technology in power stations is old, with the majority coming from mechanical heat engines and turbines. The technology behind this dates back to the Victorian era. Stanford University scientists have been looking at more advanced thermionic energy converters. These were originally designed for the space program, to aid satellite launches. Thermionic energy converters have two electrodes (an emitter and a collector) which are separated by a small vacuum gap.

By using graphene in place of traditional tungsten as the collector material, considerable increases in efficiency can be achieved. Graphene, in its basic form, is a one-atom thick sheet of carbon. The material is light, transparent, strong and very conductive. The research so far has produced a new prototype energy converter, based on a pre-existing satellite power generator. This device uses graphene in place of metal. The trials indicate that the graphene has led to the prototype being around seven times more efficient than converters in current use for fossil fuel power stations.

The new prototype is effective through addressing inefficiencies associated with current technology: a high loss of energy at the anode surface (resulting in reduced output voltage) and high electrical barriers against electrons moving in the gap between the collector and the emitter (leading to lower output current).

The new technology remains in development and it currently only functions in a vacuum chamber. Reconfiguring the process to work in a normal setting is the requisite next step for ‘re-sparking’ thermionic energy conversion.

The new prototype is described in a research paper published in the journal Nano Energy, under the heading “Back-gated graphene anode for more efficient thermionic energy converters.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Science
KEYWORDS: electricity; energy; graphene; power

1 posted on 03/11/2017 2:54:39 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Satellite powering technology makes power stations more efficient (Graphene finally being used)

It does no such thing.

It was only a lab experiment.

2 posted on 03/11/2017 3:37:38 PM PST by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Even if 7x more efficient i doubt that my outrageous electric bill would ever go down.


3 posted on 03/11/2017 3:53:16 PM PST by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mowowie

4 posted on 03/11/2017 4:02:19 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Believe they might be comparing performance with the intended Soviet radar satellite powered by TOPAZ reactor with thermionic converter.

A Stanford development(PETE) which looked good for a certain project; but, couldn’t be used with 3500 K radiant source. They went with 2000 sun concentrator photovoltaic for research prototype—verifying cooling system can properly extract waste heat with a ‘cheap’ single layer. Only 11% efficient but still kicks out 22 kW.

https://gcep.stanford.edu/pdfs/PETEtalk_gcep2010_Melosh.pdf


5 posted on 03/11/2017 4:15:10 PM PST by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Time to invest?


6 posted on 03/11/2017 5:58:58 PM PST by Bellflower (Dems = Mat 6:23 ....If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The new technology remains in development and it currently only functions in a vacuum chamber.

...

In other words, it’s still not being used and this particular research will probably go nowhere.


7 posted on 03/11/2017 6:02:54 PM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

I’d happily wager that the report concludes with a recommendation to spend more on research in this area.


8 posted on 03/11/2017 6:27:20 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson