Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘This is Nixon/Watergate’: Trump Accuses Obama Of Wire Tapping Trump Tower Before Election
yahoo.com ^ | March 4, 2017

Posted on 03/04/2017 5:46:48 AM PST by Helicondelta

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-295 next last
To: SoFloFreeper; All
Since Sessions had recused himself, does this mean he CANNOT investigate this incident because it happened during the campaign?

I think Sessions said IF NECESSARY.

Hussein is NOT a Russian and it will not be necessary for Att Gen'l Sessions to stand on the sidelines.

I am sure the DOJ has lawyers working this weekend putting the final touches on indictments. Wiretapes turned down by court mean it was very, very illegal. Like Watergate, they will START with the peons and work up to the pawns before getting the royalty.

Even Hussein is SHOCKED that Conspiracy Theorist Donald Trump would accuse Martin Luther Obama of something so low.

81 posted on 03/04/2017 6:35:40 AM PST by politicianslie (What would a terrorist do if he were made POTUS? : Exactly what Hussein Obama did)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeUSA

This all reminds me of House of Cards. Secret state where everyone is dirty and bribed. President Trump must be clean or they would have already gotten to him!


82 posted on 03/04/2017 6:36:04 AM PST by seeker41 (Trump Save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

From what I have read:

The FISA court authorized this wiretap.

The real question is what reason was given to the court to obtain the wiretap and when. Before the election? After?

Keep in mind, there was almost no chance given for Trump to win.

We need a timeline on this.


83 posted on 03/04/2017 6:36:12 AM PST by LouisianaJoanof Arc (Proud horrible deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

Remember Dem Senator Schiff’s pale look after last week’s Comey briefing? Remember Gowdey’s comments about being careful with leaked information?


84 posted on 03/04/2017 6:36:21 AM PST by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Drudge has it as Headline...

Trump towers Bugged!


85 posted on 03/04/2017 6:36:57 AM PST by Big Red Badger (UNSCANABLE in an IDIOCRACY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: HarleyLady27

That our Ex-president is a criminal is a surprise to no one. That he attempted to place a boot on the neck of the Big Man on campus is of no surprise, either. That he was caught doing so — NOW THAT IS THE ONLY SURPRISE! The SOS belongs in the litter box.


86 posted on 03/04/2017 6:37:04 AM PST by V K Lee (If all the nations in the world are in debt, where did all the money go?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta
Funny thing about this one. The president CAN, legally, wiretap without a warrant, but ONLY IF the reason is to obtain what is called "foreign intelligence." The fact that the DEMs are saying "Russia" justifies the warrantless search. And mind you, all presidents have this power. I think Aldrich Ames was caught up in a similar issue, his house was tossed w/o a warrant, and he fought the charge on that basis for awhile.

One point of the FISA court is to be a sop to idiots who think the government follows the law and gets warrants. Another point of the FISA court is to allow minimal court oversight on the front end, and still have evidence that can be used in a criminal prosecution. The only time "warrantless" ever becomes an issue is in a criminal prosecution.

The FISA law says there is a civil penalty against the government if it snoops without a warrant, but a collection of cases a few years back showed that law to be totally toothless. If the government says "state secret," the civil claim for big bucks damages dies.

87 posted on 03/04/2017 6:37:17 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; ExTexasRedhead; Jane Long; MinuteGal; jsanders2001; V K Lee; HarleyLady27; ...
SHOCKER: Obama, a sitting president, tapped candidate Trump's residence phones in NYC---in Trump Tower.

New York is not DC and it is illegal to tap the phones of your political rivals for any reason. (hat tip Jim from C-Town)

That's one to savor over and over. Thanks, Jim. As I always say....even the smartest crooks make an error. Sometimes that smallest error trips them up.

============================================

(HAT TIP ROME2000)--- All Trump has to do is declare a State of Emergency, round up blue lipped Kenyan and a couple hundred of his appointees still lurking in positions of power, and suspend Habeas Corpus until things get figured out.

88 posted on 03/04/2017 6:37:44 AM PST by Liz (DNC Chair Perez's new Democrat slogan: Join us, or we'll sue Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

Stunning, isn’t it.


89 posted on 03/04/2017 6:41:03 AM PST by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Big Red Badger
This revelation has the potential to alter public perception of the Trump presidency on a scale that it changed with the attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan.


90 posted on 03/04/2017 6:41:04 AM PST by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Great connection. I agree.


91 posted on 03/04/2017 6:42:04 AM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/03/03/occams-razor-did-nsa-admiral-mike-rogers-warn-trump-on-november-17th-2016/

Occam’s Razor – Did NSA Admiral Mike Rogers Warn Trump On November 17th, 2016?…
Posted on March 3, 2017


92 posted on 03/04/2017 6:42:36 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Common Sense 101
Obama will have a paper trail of FISA approving the tap to cover his actions. He will claim it was all legal given Wikileaks and the hack of the DNC. I doubt if this was done unilaterally by the Obama administration.

"Legal" or not, the tapping of a Presidential candidate by the USG during an election by a sitting President of the opposition party who was actively supporting the Dem candidate is very disturbing. And was that information shared with Hillary. Given her emphasis on the Trump Russian connections during the election campaign debates, it appears that was the case.

93 posted on 03/04/2017 6:42:47 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

The best defense is a good offense.


94 posted on 03/04/2017 6:42:59 AM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Didn’t the Trump tweet say no court order?


95 posted on 03/04/2017 6:44:09 AM PST by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

It’s tie you realized what kind of people you are dealing with Donald. Time to take off the kid gloves mister president.


96 posted on 03/04/2017 6:44:40 AM PST by McGruff (#PlugTheLeaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

“It is necessary for Trump to mobilize the full power of the federal government on this issue and not to squander the momentum with erratic tweets.”

There’s the rub... He isn’t being allowed the “full power of the federal government” yet, precisely because this whole ordeal is designed to keep the previous regime in power from behind the scenes.


97 posted on 03/04/2017 6:45:12 AM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: sport

Absolutely.

I want to hear that lying weasel try to justify what happened to Trump.

I have a long memory.


98 posted on 03/04/2017 6:45:25 AM PST by exit82 (The opposition has already been Trumped!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

“it might have been much smarter to spend 48 hours consulting with the Department of Justice”

Who says he hasn’t done that? The 5AM tweets sent the press hounds knocking on the doors of all involved first thing in the morning.

They woke up in the middle of the sh1tstorm and are scrambling to respond. Hopefully their are all under surveillance. So far nobody has denied anything.


99 posted on 03/04/2017 6:45:28 AM PST by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: madison10
HE was holding this until he was sure and or needed it.

It certainly explains a lot of the leaks. I'm with you, I think he's known about this for a while, given some of his previous statements and facial expressions concerning the leaks.

100 posted on 03/04/2017 6:46:35 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (0bama made Bush look great; Trump is showing him to be the loser he is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-295 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson