Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Trump Can Eliminate Gun Free Zones in the Army Corps of Engineers
Gun Watch ^ | 16 November, 2016 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 11/21/2016 4:13:54 AM PST by marktwain



President Donald Trump has committed to eliminating Gun Free Zones.  He cannot eliminate the Gun Free School Zones Act by himself.  It will take Congressional or Court action.  He can eliminate Gun Free Zones on military bases and in recruitment offices.

He can eliminate Gun Free Zones on lands managed by the Army Corps of Engineers.  Donald Trump will be the Commander in Chief.  The Army Corps of Engineers is a federal agency in the Department of Defense.  It is commanded by a Lieutenant General (three star), Todd T. Semonite.   General Semonite is under the command of Donald Trump.

President Trump can order the Army Corps of Engineers to eliminate its regulatory ban on the exercise of the Second Amendment on the lands that it administers.  Regulations cannot be changed instantly.  There are procedures to be followed. President Trump can issue an executive order that the Corps of Engineers remove the ban on weapons on the land it administers, requiring the Corps to make the changes in accordance with existing law. A problem with this method is that a new administration could reverse the rule just as easily.

Another method available to President Trump is a negotiated Court settlement. The ban on possession of weapons on land administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is being challenged in the Courts. Court cases in both the Ninth Circuit and in the Eleventh Circuit are active. A Trump administration could order the Corps of Engineers to negotiate a Court sanctioned settlement that would prohibit the Corps of Engineers from ever violating the Second Amendment again. Such Court sanctioned agreements have long been used by to create law without congressional approval, law that is impossible to remove by regulatory means.

Additionally, President Trump can support Legislative removal of the Corps' authority to regulate in this area, as they did for National Parks lands. Idaho Senator Mike Crapo has introduced legislation(pdf) to remove federal infringements on Second Amendment rights from lands controlled by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). From the press release:

The bill seeks to make firearm regulations consistent across federal lands by allowing law-abiding citizens to carry firearms on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) property. Under current law, a person may carry a concealed weapon in a National Park or Refuge as long as individuals comply with the firearm laws of the park’s home state. However, the same rights are not extended to Americans who hunt, camp or fish on land owned by the Corps, effectively denying them of their Second Amendment freedoms guaranteed under the Constitution when on Corps lands. 
This legislation has been introduced for the last three sessions of Congress but has been bottled up by Harry Reid in the Senate and the Obama administration. 
Congressional removal of the Army Corps of Engineers' ban has significant support and could be enacted during a Trump administration.  A removal of similar bans on National Park lands was enacted during the Obama administration.  It has been an unqualified success.

Opportunities for Donald Trump to keep his promise to "get rid of gun free zones" are available and multiple.

©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Link to Gun Watch


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Outdoors; Politics
KEYWORDS: banglist; corps; gunban; trump
President Trump can fulfill a campaign promise to get rid of gun free zones with this action.
1 posted on 11/21/2016 4:13:54 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

One of the many things President Donald Trump can do.


2 posted on 11/21/2016 4:36:20 AM PST by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
He can do all Federal sites. The states will have to decide what they want to do.

In other words, there should be NO FEDERAL GUN FREE ZONES.

And we have to straighten out carry from state to state. If I visit my parents in Florida, I shouldn't have to leave my gun in NY. Reciprocity is a must.

3 posted on 11/21/2016 4:53:26 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

He needs to be smart about it. We want to make it as non-reversable as possible.


4 posted on 11/21/2016 4:55:59 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Try eliminating gun free zones in federal Post Offices, which also include the parking lots, first.

At the bare minimum, allow vehicle storage in the parking lots of Post Offices.


5 posted on 11/21/2016 5:35:17 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Another place to remove the ban is BLM (not Black Lives Matter) and Forest Service offices.

Walk into a Ranger Station in the middle of nowhere, and your concealed carry weapon is suddenly a felony. And all you wanted was a detailed map of the area and a little friendly chit-chat on where the deer hang out.


6 posted on 11/21/2016 5:55:35 AM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave

Walk into a visitors center in a national park and you are violating federali law. I can hike all over Great Sand Dunes and Rocky Mountain National Park carrying but have to lock it in the car to enter the building


7 posted on 11/21/2016 7:20:09 AM PST by bravo whiskey (Never bring a liberal gun law to a gun fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Such Court sanctioned agreements have long been used by to create law without congressional approval, law that is impossible to remove by regulatory means.

We should be very very concerned at any such settlements. Enviros use them all the time to "force" EPA to adopt regulations or interpretations of federal statutes that then becoming binding because of the court order. When the agency colludes with their friends in the enviro community it means we are all cut out of the process.

8 posted on 11/21/2016 8:18:21 AM PST by FateAmenableToChange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FateAmenableToChange

When the agency colludes with their friends in the enviro community it means we are all cut out of the process.


Exactly correct. We should use them to our advantage, then push for making them illegitimate in an Article V convention in three years.


9 posted on 11/21/2016 9:07:57 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson