Skip to comments.
Bill Kristol: Maybe Republicans should nominate someone with a ‘radical constitutional agenda’ next
Canada Free Press ^
| 10/27/16
| Robert Laurie
Posted on 10/27/2016 11:08:23 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: Sean_Anthony
The only radical agenda should be to take back the country. reverse illegal and excessive immigration and nominate supreme court justices who Will help in those processes. We have already nominated “constituional loving “ Justices and they at first opposed lib lawyers and then lost and then said okay we have a precedent and we have to live up to that as if that suddenly made everything constitutional.
41
posted on
10/27/2016 11:50:01 AM PDT
by
amnestynone
(We are asked by people who do not tolerate us to tolerate the intolerable in the name of tolerance.)
To: Sean_Anthony
42
posted on
10/27/2016 11:57:12 AM PDT
by
pasr
(You are crazy,,,,,,,,,,)
To: MissTed
That’s really it. Look for attempts at white genocide. There is going to be a war within from Islam and complicated matters with Russia, China, North Korea and Iran. Very dark times ahead.
To: Sean_Anthony
44
posted on
10/27/2016 12:11:19 PM PDT
by
stocksthatgoup
(When the MSM wants your opinion, they will give it to you)
To: Buckeye McFrog
To: Sean_Anthony
Billy should be selling ice cream from a truck.
46
posted on
10/27/2016 12:34:25 PM PDT
by
justa-hairyape
(The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
To: Sean_Anthony
Bill Kristol lost his seat at the table, so now he is PO’d.
They even invite Fred Barnes. How can Bill K. save face?
He can’t.
47
posted on
10/27/2016 12:37:00 PM PDT
by
xzins
( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
To: Sean_Anthony
Maybe they could start by finding a candidate who acknowledges that the Natural Born Clause actually, you know, applies to him.
The raging hypocrisy of the sanctimonious NeverTrump bleaters is astounding. They apply self-serving lawyerly sophistry to the plain language of the NBC clause of the Constitution to argue Cruz, Rubio or Jindal qualified in exactly the same way that they condemn the left for doing with the militia clause of 2A when the left argues that 2A only protects the right of the national guard to have arms.
To: DrDude
Couldn’t agree with you more. And I do believe there are tens of millions of us who feel the same.
49
posted on
10/27/2016 12:50:02 PM PDT
by
nfldgirl
To: Buckeye McFrog
Yes, this is the last chance the GOP has to win the WH.
These idiots are strongly delusional to think that we will be voting GOP in the future if Trump loses.
50
posted on
10/27/2016 12:56:32 PM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
To: Sean_Anthony
This is so cute. After sabotaging Trump Kristol and the others think we are going to come running back to them if Trump loses saying “you were right, lead us.” Oh, we are come my running back to them all right, with torches and pitch forks. Poor arrogant bastards.
To: Sean_Anthony
A Neocon Trotskyite extolling Strict Constitutionalism?
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ...
Wait. Okay. I’m better ...
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ...
52
posted on
10/27/2016 1:41:02 PM PDT
by
YogicCowboy
("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
To: Sean_Anthony
Not gonna happen. Not gonna work. Kristol isn't sincere in suggesting it.
The lesson of the Bush years: when Republicans controlled all the branches of government, we didn't get that radical libertarian agenda.
The country doesn't want it.
53
posted on
10/27/2016 1:43:27 PM PDT
by
x
To: Sean_Anthony
“. . . but instead to preparing for a post-Trump GOP.”
Don’t bother - there won’t be a Republican party if Trump loses.
54
posted on
10/27/2016 2:36:57 PM PDT
by
oldbill
To: Sean_Anthony
I’m pretty ambivalent about a Trump presidency but making Bill Kristol STHU would be one of its huge benefits. FWIW, I’m totally opposed to a Hillary presidency.
55
posted on
10/27/2016 3:00:02 PM PDT
by
CommerceComet
(Hillary: A unique blend of incompetence and corruption.)
To: Sean_Anthony
Kristol is being sarcastic?
56
posted on
10/27/2016 3:02:02 PM PDT
by
Heart of Georgia
(#neverhellary ... but then, I'm just an uneducated hayseed)
To: eaglestar
How slovenly he looks. You can put a dork in a nice shirt and tie, but in the end a dork still looks like a goofy overweight seal.
To: Sean_Anthony
I can’t wait til election night when they have to talk Kristol down off the roof.
58
posted on
10/27/2016 3:14:02 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: Sean_Anthony
Bill Kristol: Maybe Republicans should nominate someone with a radical constitutional agenda nextWhat's this bozo's concept of "radical" Constitutionalism?
Strict faith in the text of the Constitution?
"Creative" interpretations?
Get rid of the stuff tht doesn't work with your limited intellect?
What?
59
posted on
10/27/2016 3:38:55 PM PDT
by
publius911
(IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
To: Sean_Anthony
I betcha if Trump loses Kristol goes into hiding till he thinks the coast is clear. He’s a simpering chicken lickin.
60
posted on
10/27/2016 4:45:25 PM PDT
by
tinamina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson