Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You Should Be Able to Check Your Ballot Online - Groups Should be Able to Audit Results
Freep | 10/28/2016 | CharlesOConnell

Posted on 10/25/2016 7:17:42 AM PDT by CharlesOConnell

This is the country that records your every word. Assisted by the social media this is your friendly Big Brother. But they can't come up with documents against their interest, or e-mails that Iran has, for years.

Fair minded elections officials should have suggested long ago that you be able to check your ballot online. There should be impartial commissions that allow voters to aggregate their votes to see if they tally with official results--Impossible? How do they tally the votes in the first place?



TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: election; fraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 10/25/2016 7:17:42 AM PDT by CharlesOConnell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

Any such facility would open your ballot to hackers and tampering, unfortunately.


2 posted on 10/25/2016 7:20:32 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

I am a computer software engineer,

I could write a system that allowed voting with verification online

why can’t they?

(Rhetorical- I know they answer... because they don’t wantt to)


3 posted on 10/25/2016 7:20:48 AM PDT by Mr. K (Trump is running against EVERYONE. The Democrats, The Media, and the establishment GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

No freaking way!!! If you can check your ballot, so can your boss, your union, your guberment employer. Touch screen voting machines should be outlawed. Mark sense ballots are easily counted and recounted, should be universally used. Keep secret elections secret.


4 posted on 10/25/2016 7:20:55 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

Votes are tallied using software developed by Soros. He not only owns the voting machines, he controls the counting machines. Soros has stated that Trump’s impending majority victory will be squelched by Hillary’s Electoral College majority. He should know. He is doing the counting.


5 posted on 10/25/2016 7:21:34 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell ( Trump is the collective voice of 100 million F U Â’s.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

> I could write a system that allowed voting with verification online

That’s not hard. It gets hard when one adds the requirement of a secret ballot. If I can verify who I voted for online, so can someone else.


6 posted on 10/25/2016 7:24:30 AM PDT by thoughtomator (This election is a referendum on the Rule of Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell
Fair minded elections officials should have suggested long ago that you be able to check your ballot online.

I've seen a number of people asking for the ability to confirm their vote was recorded properly.

It sounds good, but there's a problem. And that problem is the reason why at least some states prohibit the issuance of a receipt or any other way to verify your vote was recorded in a certain way.

The problem: evidence of a vote can be used to suborn someone into voting a certain way. An example: a union official requires every member to go and vote for the Democrat, and show him the receipt -- or that member doesn't get any more jobs at the union hall.

I'm sure you can come up with other scenarios involving employer/employee or family members.

There have been proposals for open source voting systems that provide paper ballots that can be verified for accuracy at the time of voting:

Open Voting Consortium

But, I don't think you want something that can be verified afterwards, after the vote is cast. The opportunity for abuse is huge.

7 posted on 10/25/2016 7:25:16 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator; Mr. K; NonValueAdded
If I can verify who I voted for online, so can someone else.

In a nutshell, this is the problem.

It's much more succinct than my post #7. :-)

8 posted on 10/25/2016 7:27:55 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

In a world with computers, we should be able to submit a ballot vote with a picture and at the same time be cross checked for registration legality. It really should be that simple.


9 posted on 10/25/2016 7:30:15 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

Here are the phone numbers (for each state) to report election fraud:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3484590/posts



10 posted on 10/25/2016 7:30:58 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen (ELITE IMMUNITY: how the NWO puppetsmasters / puppets continue to function)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

This could be hacked to. Perhaps it could be coded in such a way or there is a separate database for audits to show the original vote of the user and not the counted vote... Just saying it can be a possibility.


11 posted on 10/25/2016 7:32:53 AM PDT by Democrats hate too much
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

Vote verification would lead to employer/union thuggery: “How did you vote? Show us!”


12 posted on 10/25/2016 7:33:22 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

This year you are gonna have to wear red.


13 posted on 10/25/2016 7:41:59 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell
All these posts about touch sensitive screens registering the wrong vote on screen; although a plausible rigging scheme , a more likely scenario is the votes are not even counted. Software can appear to using raw data and spitting out results, but since the raw voting files are not traceable due to anonymity protection, how could any body really know they are even being counted?
14 posted on 10/25/2016 7:42:54 AM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

You don’t want to verify your vote by NAME

You get a scan code that is randomly generated and look up your vote by that number. Maybe a ‘tear-off’ at the top of a computer sheet you put into the machine

Your name would never be associated with that code.

The last time I voted they marked a number on my ballot, and then marked that number next to my name and I asked them what they hell they were doing?


15 posted on 10/25/2016 7:43:18 AM PDT by Mr. K (Trump is running against EVERYONE. The Democrats, The Media, and the establishment GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

You are correct. I can’t understand why people don’t see this.

The lack of ourcry about this from the RNC means they’re complicit. It explains their peculiar behavior regarding Trump. They’re just as corrupt as the dims and they’re terrified of prison. Or just losing their place at the trillion dollar trough.


16 posted on 10/25/2016 7:44:36 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
You get a scan code that is randomly generated and look up your vote by that number.

And, once you have that scan code -- what will stop someone from demanding it as proof you cast your vote as instructed?

17 posted on 10/25/2016 7:45:47 AM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

Paper ballots.


18 posted on 10/25/2016 7:46:20 AM PDT by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesOConnell

Paper ballots + bloackchain


19 posted on 10/25/2016 7:56:56 AM PDT by oblomov (We have passed the point where "law," properly speaking, has any further application. - C. Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oblomov

blockchain


20 posted on 10/25/2016 7:57:15 AM PDT by oblomov (We have passed the point where "law," properly speaking, has any further application. - C. Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson