“Just one singe person could bring a successful suit saying, “No, I didn’t vote for the D ‘electors,’ I voted for Cankles.” And he’d have a point.”
As I recall, ballots here (AZ) state that the vote is, in fact, for a slate of electors. Therefore, such a case would be thrown out instantly.
I guess you missed the thousands of successful suits against companies/products that have very clear disclaimers: courts rule as they wish, especially if it is toward “democracy” or “social justice”.
The public nature of this would be unrelenting. No, I don’t care what the “law” says, this would be a “reverse Roberts” especially in a Republican state.