Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton learned charitable giving from George Soros
Canada Free Press ^ | 09/10/16 | A. Dru Kristenev

Posted on 09/10/2016 6:29:00 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony

Placing someone in the Oval Office who has proven that she will always serve personal gain above the national security with which she has been entrusted, is, in the colloquial, inviting the fox into the henhouse

Clinton Foundation corruption runs deep in access peddling, its management absorbing lessons by sitting at the feet of a master manipulator. For decades, George Soros set the standard for entrenching philanthropic agencies in governmental policy development overseas. After years of perfecting methods of infiltration into foreign politics, he turned his full attention onto his adopted country, one to which he emigrated with an eye to influence, undermine and engineer government for personal gain—under the guise of social justice, of course.

Assisting the collapse of administrations in former Eastern Bloc countries, the Open Society Institute maneuvered itself into replacement educational, environmental and economic policy. All of it was done dangling grants of millions of dollars as the prize for following OSI guidelines in rebuilding schools, social structure and bureaucracies. In Romania alone, local press identified his back-stage involvement in deposing Nicolae Ceauçescu. Destabilizing nations then moving into the shambles with handouts to the devastated communities, all with strings attached, has been the Soros modus operandi in more than 50 countries. This is part of the OSI mission:


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: charitablegiving; charity; clinton; clintonfoundation; fundingtheleft; georgesoros; mememe; soros

1 posted on 09/10/2016 6:29:00 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

“Giving?” Giving? This b!tch once claimed used underwear as deductions for charitable giving on her taxes. Who does that?


2 posted on 09/10/2016 6:31:04 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
giving money to socialists/communists, muslimes and anti-Americans of all stripes is NOT charity...
3 posted on 09/10/2016 6:32:12 AM PDT by Chode (You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Did Clinton also learn how to hand Jews over to the Gestapo and sell their property at huge profits?


4 posted on 09/10/2016 6:33:03 AM PDT by MuttTheHoople (Yes, Liberals, I question your patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

They are too busy lecturing everyone about “getting the money out of politics.”


5 posted on 09/10/2016 6:34:28 AM PDT by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

6 posted on 09/10/2016 6:34:37 AM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (Globalism = Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Clinton’s view of charity is old fashioned — “Charity begins at home”. She gives to herself and her family first and foremost. She has no shame. She operate on the same “principle” as those tele-preachers who beg funds from the elderly and the poor and drive around in limosines and live in lavish, walled mansions.


7 posted on 09/10/2016 6:41:19 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic ( “Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
“Giving?” Giving? This b!tch once claimed used underwear as deductions for charitable giving on her taxes. Who does that?

The Clintons don't give money to anyone not named Clinton. Over the past nine years, the Clintons gave just under $16 million to charity, which is 10.8 percent of their total income. The vast majority of that — about $15.8 million went to the Clinton Family Slush Fund, oops, I mean Foundation.

8 posted on 09/10/2016 6:41:21 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
The fundamental fallacies of the “charitable” Clinton Foundation is that, as a principal of the foundation

Consequently, for Hillary as Secretary of State to be a principal in the Clinton Foundation put her directly in violation of the stricture

Article 1 Section 9:
No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state

9 posted on 09/10/2016 7:28:21 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

The Evil that walks amongst us never gives up, well, some walk, some still use broomsticks..


10 posted on 09/10/2016 9:57:38 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson