An Open Letter To Gays

Flopping Aces ^ | 06-14-16 | Skookum

[dmz]

I guess i’m just a horrible person or something because I feel the same way I would if I had just heard that an ISIS troop transport had suddenly gone over a cliff.

<><><><

Ahh, a freeper who sees no significant difference between ISIS fighters and US citizens killed by terrorism.

I’ll just go ahead and agree with your self assessment. Actually I’d take it further.

But since getting banned over the likes of you (which is what my commentary would get me), I conclude you are simply not worth it.

[DiogenesLamp]

Ahh, a freeper who sees no significant difference between ISIS fighters and US citizens killed by terrorism.

Being a US citizen does not preclude one from being an enemy of what I hold dear. Most of the people who have been damaging us are "US Citizens."

The homosexuals are a particular group of "US Citizens" that have been doing amazingly destructive things to this nation.

In terms of damage to our people and our society, you are correct. ISIS fighters cannot come close to comparing to the destruction done by Homosexuals. ISIS didn't kill millions of innocent people, ISIS hasn't been able to force acceptance of perversion in this nation. ISIS hasn't molested very many children in my country, but the Homosexuals have.

Yes, you have shown me the error of my ways. Homosexuals are far *WORSE* than ISIS fighters in terms of the carnage they have wrought in *MY* nation.

I’ll just go ahead and agree with your self assessment. Actually I’d take it further.

I know how I look to people from a liberally manipulated society. I am not at all ashamed of it, but I knew that it would look horrible to the "group think" mindset that has been created by the propaganda organs of the Liberal media.

But since getting banned over the likes of you (which is what my commentary would get me), I conclude you are simply not worth it.

Well there's that, and the fact that you would get your intellectual @$$ handed to you in a battle of wits with me.

Yes, discretion is the better part of valor for you.

[DiogenesLamp]

And of Course, ISIS hasn't pulled any stuff like this.

[dmz]

the fact that you would get your intellectual @$$ handed to you in a battle of wits with me.

Yes, discretion is the better part of valor for you.

<><><><

The witless always say that.

[DiogenesLamp]

The witless always say that.

And your rebuttal is the "witless" version of "Oh Yeah?"

[dmz]

And your rebuttal is the “witless” version of “Oh Yeah?”

<><><>

Actually closer to ——yawn-——

[DiogenesLamp]

Actually closer to ——yawn-——

This is so funny. This exact behavior is described in the book "The Lucifer Principle" regarding someone who tries to pretend they are "above the fray", when in fact they are getting their @$$ kicked, and desperately hoping no one will notice.

Feigning boredom is what losers do because they perceive they won't be able to win if they go on the attack.

It's a face saving tactic, but it doesn't really fool anyone.

You should read that book. It will perhaps better educate you in the nature of people. (An no, it isn't about Lucifer.)

[dmz]

Remember. I called you out for your despicable comments - hardly the actions of one who is ‘above the fray’.

Nice try, though.

What other books have you heard of that have content that is not at all applicable to our discussion?

[DiogenesLamp]

Remember. I called you out for your despicable comments - hardly the actions of one who is ‘above the fray’.

My comments aren't despicable. They are pragmatic and realist. It is the nonsense you wish to believe that is despicable, because it hides the truth and encourages others in false perceptions.

What other books have you heard of that have content that is not at all applicable to our discussion?

Simple minds don't perceive connections when they exist. They lack perception. I think I begin to see what your problem really is.

You don't have the breadth of knowledge or the understanding of scope necessary to discuss this, or perhaps many other issues. You are a product of your environment that has not yet risen above it.

[dmz]

Simple minds don’t perceive connections when they exist.

<><><

Or, as in this case, a simple mind (yours) sees connections that don’t exist.

remember, it was your thesis that I was announcing I was above the fray, by virtue of yawning at your quite transparent rationalizations - a statement completely at odds with the reality of the situation (hence the connection you made that doesnt exist).

You go ahead and try to convince yourself and others that exulting in the massacre of 49 Americans on US soil by an Islamic terrorist - 49 gays not harshing your buzz - is not despicable.

It is. Objectively.

[DiogenesLamp]

It is. Objectively.

Subjectively. You are not objective, you are biased by the propaganda you lacked the wit to reject when it was spoon fed to you by the media sources you consume.

I bet you even have a facebook account.

[dmz]

Subjectively.

<><><

Apparently you are unaware of the meaning of the word despicable.

I despise the sentiment you expressed with your contemptible position re: the massacred US citizens being no different to you than a busload of ISIS fighters falling off a cliff, hence, in my opinion, despicable.

True by definition.

Objectively true.

[DiogenesLamp]

I despise the sentiment you expressed with your contemptible position re: the massacred US citizens being no different to you than a busload of ISIS fighters falling off a cliff, hence, in my opinion, despicable.

That you despise and show contempt does not make your sentiments objective. In fact, the description of it being your opinion explicitly makes it subjective.

For an example of real objectivity, I will demonstrate a few ways in which homosexuality is objectively bad.

1. They are a genetic dead end by the rules of natural selection.
2. They spread diseases which kill innocent people.
3. They molest little boys at a rate far greater than their representation in the population.
4. They are overrepresented among the ranks of serial killers.
5. They commit suicide at a rate 30 times higher than the normal portion of the population. (Normal being Heterosexual) 6. They were regarded as "mentally ill" for most of this nation's existence, and were only removed from the list of mental illnesses through a campaign of threatened violence and intimidation of the Doctors of the APA back in 1973. They were not removed from the list of mental disorders for valid medical reasons.

And that is what "Objective" looks like.

And now you can put on your little emotional driven thinking cap and start shrieking.

[sargon]

My comments aren't despicable.

Yes, they are.

And, in case you hadn't noticed, we're not living under the Old Covenant any more. Under the old covenant, for example, a child who disobeyed their parent could be summarily killed. Do you advocate that?

There were also all sorts of laws regarding human slavery in the Old Testament.

Do you think we should still have human slavery and its associated laws?

Civilization doesn't think so crudely any more.

We're living under the New Covenant. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit concluded at some point that a New Covenant was necessary; one centered around love and forgiveness.

Adultery was punishable by death under the Old Covenant, and yet Christ said "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone".

Hate the sin, not the sinner, and don't try to justify your hatred based on what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah.

Cheering the death of a group of sinful people who don't deserve such punishment is as sinful as the sin of homosexuality itself, IMHO.

Vote Trump!

[DiogenesLamp]

And, in case you hadn't noticed, we're not living under the Old Covenant any more. Under the old covenant, for example, a child who disobeyed their parent could be summarily killed. Do you advocate that?

False choice. I don't have to advocate anything in the Old Testament to recognize that homosexuals are effectively our enemy.

Civilization doesn't think so crudely any more.

Don't flatter modern "civilization". It is approaching Pagan barbarism faster than anyone would have imagined. It is thinking very crudely indeed nowadays. A man is a woman, and if you disagree you are a hatemonger that needs to be fined or imprisoned?

Cheering the death of a group of sinful people who don't deserve such punishment is as sinful as the sin of homosexuality itself, IMHO.

Ignoring any religious aspect of this argument, do you have a more valid point? Why is cheering at the deaths of your enemies objectively bad? When the US dropped the bombs on Japan, all of the men in our armed forces cheered.

Why? Because they realized there were a whole lot of people they weren't going to have to fight.

If you don't think we are in a fight, you haven't been paying attention lately to gay wedding cakes.

[sargon]

Why is cheering at the deaths of your enemies objectively bad? When the US dropped the bombs on Japan, all of the men in our armed forces cheered.

As long as your fellow Americans who are gay aren't automatically considered "your enemies", I guess I'd agree...