Posted on 06/11/2016 1:30:02 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I hope you are correct. I would love to see it.
Mr. Allen repudiated his original statement within hours of returning to his “community”. The prosecution then interviewed him again at a later date. That 2nd interview is what was not disclosed to the defense. They almost got away with it. Allen’s attorney struggled with the conflict between his duty to protect his client’s privacy and his duty to the justice system as a whole, and finally came down on the side of the latter duty just a couple of days ago. Had he not done so, the defense would have never known about the later meeting.
Brady disclosures........they probably cover that on the second day of law school.
Maryland “Freak State” PING!
Well there you go then, that’s their excuse. “Your honor, I forgot. That was so long ago...”
You have no idea what you are talking about and are making a total fool of yourself. Just thought you should know.
Oh, and everyone is laughing at you too.
lol. You win the best post of the year dude. As funny as your seriousness makes it. It’s still a deep deep delusion of yours that the facts don’t matter or you can just dismiss them and make new ones up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.