Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Must Tell the Nation
US Defense Watch ^ | April 9, 2016 | Ray Starmann

Posted on 04/09/2016 10:28:28 PM PDT by pboyington

Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen, in concern for the lives of current and future US military personnel and to honor those who have gone before, I must speak to the nation today.

I’ve called this press conference to announce that I am resigning as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and I am retiring after 39 years on active duty, which included combat service in Iraq leading the finest Marines in the world.

I am resigning as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and retiring from the Marine Corps for the following reasons:

For the last seven years during the Obama Administration:

I have watched and remained silent as hundreds of senior officers were forced to resign or were forcibly retired because of their disagreements with the current policies wrecking the military.

I have watched and remained silent as people who have never served a day in uniform laid siege to the glorious traditions of the US military.

I have watched and remained silent as male ROTC cadets paraded in red high heels, male soldiers conducted physical training wearing pregnancy simulators, combat units dealt with breastfeeding and lactation issues in the field and sensitivity training became the standard operating procedure of the US military.

I have watched and remained silent as trans-genders were authorized to serve in the ranks, and three females graduated from the US Army Ranger School, under what I believe are the most dubious of circumstances.

My predecessors in the JCS chose to look the other way, and like Pontius Pilate, wash their hands of these egregious affairs.

My predecessors in the JCS were more concerned about their careers than about the welfare of the nation and the troops they led every day.

Now the final nail in the coffin of the US military has been hammered in. On April 1, 2016, Secretary of Defense Ash Carter, with the full backing of the President of the United States, authorized the legal inclusion of women in the combat arms branches and special operations units of the United States Armed Forces.

In good conscience, I can no longer remain silent. The stakes are too high for this nation and for the women in the US military who, I believe will be greatly harmed by their inclusion in the combat arms and special operations.

I can no longer watch the US military be annihilated. While many have chosen to sit on the sidelines, I must step forth and report to the nation concerning the mortal danger the US military is in tonight because of its commander in chief, President Barack Obama and his cabinet and advisers.

The evidence against women in direct combat from the Center for Military Readiness and the Marine Corps’ 36 million dollar, 9 month study and the performance of women at the Marine Infantry Officers Basic Course is overwhelming. Yet, the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the Navy and the Secretary of the Army refuse to acknowledge that the evidence even exists.

It does exist and it indicates that while women perform spectacularly in 80% of the jobs in the military, the combat arms and special operations should be closed to them; permanently.

Women are simply prone to more injuries than men, have less muscle mass, do not have the upper body strength, the same aerobic lung capacity and the aggressiveness to fulfill the military’s combat readiness requirements and missions.

The so-called experts often say that women have already served in combat. In the last two conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, females did engage the enemy and many performed heroically and beyond the call of duty. But, returning fire during a military police security operation is not the same as being in a combat arms unit that has the mission of finding, fixing and killing the enemy. That is like comparing Pop Warner Football with the NFL.

Reality says that women serving in the combat arms and special operations is not just a bad idea, but a horrific decision that puts this nation in mortal danger.

The President and the Secretary of Defense are not dealing with reality, but with a feminist based fantasy based on false premises of gender neutrality. They see the world the way they want it to be, not the way it is. These policies are based on the illusion that genders are neutral and that none of this will affect the military’s readiness, esprit de corps and ability to wage and win wars.

There is no gender neutrality on a battlefield.

It is the responsibility of America’s military leaders to protect the nation and to obey the lawful orders of those appointed above us. But, our military leaders are not martinets. There is no Fuehrerprinzip in America. An order is not just an order. The nation’s military leaders have a moral duty to inform our elected officials when policies they support and implement are destructive to the nation itself.

Silence is not golden. It is pure and unadulterated moral cowardice.

Congress also has a duty to protect the nation and to insure that the military is strong and readiness is maintained. On the issue of women in combat, Congress has been full of sound and fury, while signifying nothing. Except for a few concerned veterans like Senator John McCain and Congressman Duncan Hunter, Congress has remained silent because a majority of Congress has never served and is largely ignorant of the issue itself.

I cannot in good conscience promote policies that will order American women, ages 18 – 26 to register and be eligible for a military draft which could place them in combat arms units in wartime.

I cannot in good conscience serve as the highest ranking military member of the US military, when I am completely at odds with the social engineering directives emanating from the Secretary of Defense and the President.

The military has one sole mission. That is to wage war and to vanquish the enemies of this nation on land, on the seas and in the air. It must never be used as a social engineering project by naïve and uninformed politicians and lobbyists.

As the military prepares for this cataclysmic change, the enemies of this nation are lining up against us. They know that this is a lose, lose situation for us and a win, win situation for them. They know that we are now going to wage war with a much weaker force and that our readiness is withering by the hour.

It is very possible that the United States of America may never win another war. I do not believe this is hyperbole. I believe this is a fact.

The fate of the republic hangs in mortal jeopardy. I pray that my successor and a new President elected in 2016 have the courage and the wisdom to amend the policies that might very well destroy this great nation I have served for nearly four decades.

I bid you farewell. Semper Fi.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: ashcarter; feminism; joedunford; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 04/09/2016 10:28:29 PM PDT by pboyington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pboyington

Excellent speech and very much to the point.

It’ll never be spoken until well after obama has hit the retirement trail, if then.


2 posted on 04/09/2016 10:32:42 PM PDT by Jack Hammer (uff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

More honor than the General has.


3 posted on 04/09/2016 10:33:23 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

Never happen because he would have too much to lose.The pension will be a doozy after 38 years of service and he is not going to risk losing that.


4 posted on 04/09/2016 10:47:35 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

The Chairman is a disgrace. The Chairman is a bootllicking Obama acolyte whose committment to his pension far outweighs his committment to the Nation, it’s traditions and the honor of the troops.


5 posted on 04/09/2016 10:48:18 PM PDT by atc23 (The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pboyington
bttt
6 posted on 04/09/2016 10:50:31 PM PDT by vigilante2 (Re-elect nobody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

Excellent speech. Says it like it is. Points out the extreme idiocy of those using the U.S. military as a social engineering experiment which will actually get our soldiers killed in greater numbers. Either free up the soldiers to wage war and vanquish our enemies or get the hell out of the way.


7 posted on 04/09/2016 10:58:04 PM PDT by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE

“Never happen because he would have too much to lose. The pension will be a doozy after 38 years of service and he is not going to risk losing that.”

He expects his subordinates to lose their very lives. The coward needs to resign if he isn’t willing to risk less.


8 posted on 04/09/2016 11:00:54 PM PDT by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino; HANG THE EXPENSE

Far more likely to see a quiet retirement...and the benefits that go with it...rather than a bold speech that could ruffle feathers.
I am sure most people can see why he would be more inclined to take the path of least resistance after many years of service.


9 posted on 04/09/2016 11:09:13 PM PDT by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays

Guess the Marines that die weren’t inclined to take the path of least resistance? He’s a damned coward unworthy to lead them. He won’t risk a pension. He wants others to risk their life.

But its what id expect from someone like this pogue. His first combat was as a General Officer.


10 posted on 04/09/2016 11:18:27 PM PDT by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

If only this were true...


11 posted on 04/09/2016 11:37:52 PM PDT by Eagles6 ( Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pboyington
Women are simply prone to more injuries than men, have less muscle mass, do not have the upper body strength, the same aerobic lung capacity and the aggressiveness to fulfill the military’s combat readiness requirements and missions.

Plus ... a few other things. We have to ask, is there such a thing as a woman? Is there such a thing as a man? These people are saying no.

12 posted on 04/10/2016 12:29:54 AM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EinNYC

What would I like him to say? Obama is a traitor and the Joint Cheifs have deposed him and will rule as a Junta untill the election. Congress is closed and the miltary will rule. Hillary will be arrested as well.


13 posted on 04/10/2016 1:40:17 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

Be careful what you wish for.


14 posted on 04/10/2016 1:52:26 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

bmp4L8R with http://www.jcs.mil/


15 posted on 04/10/2016 2:00:18 AM PDT by huldah1776 ( Vote Pro-life! Allow God to bless America before He avenges the death of the innocent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE
The pension will be a doozy after 38 years of service and he is not going to risk losing that.

Exactly by these butt kissers are hanging onto Obama and letting America go down the toilet.

In the end they could give a care less about America and it boils down to their pension and well being.

What oath?

16 posted on 04/10/2016 3:15:21 AM PDT by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

It was not voiced during Viet Nam when our hands were tied preventing victory and will never be voiced by ticket punching brown nose zeros. Case in point, the recently retired General (Hookworm) Dempsey.


17 posted on 04/10/2016 4:01:41 AM PDT by BTCM (Death and destruction is the only treaty Muslims comprehend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pboyington

“My predecessors in the JCS were more concerned about their careers than about the welfare of the nation and the troops they led every day.”

Not entirely true.

General Ron Fogleman retired early because of Clinton and PC.


18 posted on 04/10/2016 5:01:23 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE

Resigning will not lose his pension.


19 posted on 04/10/2016 5:09:03 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: eartick

Resigning will result in losing his pension.


20 posted on 04/10/2016 5:11:12 AM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson