Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MIT’s New 5-Atom Quantum Computer Could Make Today’s Encryption Obsolete
Cryptogon ^ | March 6, 2016

Posted on 03/24/2016 1:38:22 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: HiTech RedNeck

I never said never.

Just implied not right now.

They’ve got 5 to “crack” a 4-bit key, we’d need thousands (go research the relevant crypto discussions via Google) to crack 256-bit encryption in a sane amount of time.

As a kid, Dad kept a 32-bit core memory board in a drawer. It was pretty neat at the time.
Right now, I’m writing this on a computer that stores 4,096,000,000,000,000 bits in the same space & price.
I expect a similar increase in qbit availability & density in no longer than the same time frame, if not a whole lot sooner.
The biggest problem we’ll face with computing technology 40 years hence is figuring out what to _do_ with all that mind-boggling capacity. We’re just coming to grips with the possibility that we might actually crack large-key encryption in a matter of _minutes_; what else could be done with an order of magnitude of orders of magnitude more qbits? I remember looking at a Cray 2 (in person) and wondering what could happen if we threw all that power at a user interface; today, I’ve got that in my pocket and colloquially call it a “phone”.
Get yer shades. The future is gonna be bright.


21 posted on 03/24/2016 3:11:12 PM PDT by ctdonath2 ("Get the he11 out of my way!" - John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Are there any problems an enormous amount of money can’t solve?


22 posted on 03/24/2016 3:13:53 PM PDT by Kommodor (Terrorist, Journalist or Democrat? I can't tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Diogenesis

“...but quantum computing relies on atomic-scale units, or “qubits,” that can be simultaneously 0 and 1—a state known as a superposition that’s far more efficient.”

What the hell does that mean?

Does anybody here have any clue as to what that article says?

The only thing that I could get out of it is that a quantum computer can factor the number 15 with a 99% confidence. And I’m supposed to be impressed?

I can do it in my head with 100% confidence.


23 posted on 03/24/2016 10:34:01 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson