Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenfield: Will Black Voters Leave Hillary's Plantation?
FrontPage ^ | February 22, 2016 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 02/22/2016 4:50:47 AM PST by Louis Foxwell

Will Black Voters Leave Hillary's Plantation?

Keeping them on the plantation is the only way she can win.

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

In her desperate scramble to the top every Hillary victory is accompanied by a setback. The corrupt Democratic machine that has kept her going this far eked out a victory in Nevada, but took down her minority firewall. 

In earlier primaries, Hillary had lost women and young voters. In Nevada, she lost Latinos.

The last and only element of the Obama coalition that she has retained are black voters. Black voters helped Hillary in Nevada. While Latinos defected to Sandernistan, black voters remained loyally behind on Hillary's Happy Plantation. If the black voters, primarily women who powered the Obama campaign, wave goodbye to life on the Clinton Tara, then Hillary's path to the White House ends with Sanders' Socialist march to the Potomac.

Despite her victory in Nevada, the Clinton crisis is now real. Hillary Clinton has lost nearly every demographic of what was supposed to be her base. She has become a purely political machine candidate with no supporters, only staffers, no appeal, only strategy, and no way forward except increasingly grotesque forms of electoral fraud that risk alienating Democrats until she becomes unelectable in a general election as the voters who saw their efforts to vote for Bernie Sanders thwarted resentfully decide to stay home.

A similar stolen nomination in which Hillary Clinton was the victim led to a crisis in '08 which was only resolved with a deal between Obama and Clintonworld that allowed her to use his administration as the platform for her own future presidential campaign. But Hillary may not be able to buy the elderly Bernie Sanders, who would be 82 in time for Hillary’s two terms to end, and his supporters off in the same way. 

Hillary Clinton's only political asset is her former rival. It is Obama, not Bill Clinton and his saxophone, who is keeping black voters on the Clinton plantation. Hillary Clinton's most devastating accusation against Sanders didn’t come with her gun control attacks, but by questioning his allegiance to Obama.

In identity politics, the political is tribal and personal. Policies matter less than racial allegiances. When Sanders protested that he should be allowed to disagree with Obama on occasion, black voters clearly disagreed. The black vote has been tragically distilled to personal and tribal allegiance to Obama.

The very tribal element that allowed the left to push Obama past Hillary is now obstructing their efforts to push Bernie Sanders past Hillary Clinton.

Obama has become Hillary's political human shield on everything from her controversial Wall Street cash to her various political evolutions. Her response to any Bernie Sanders attack from the left now amounts to, "But Obama did it." It's an argument that has not impressed younger voters who came of age too late to be swept away by the Obama Cult or Latino voters who were never true believers in the First Progressive Church of Obama, but it continues to hold the loyalty and faith of many black voters. 

Bernie Sanders endorsements from #BlackLivesMatter figures proved insignificant to black voters next to the magic of the Obama name. Considering how badly off the Obama years have left African-Americans, her ties to that era ought to be a minus, but a confused racial solidarity has taken Hillary from losing the black vote to becoming as dependent on black political labor as any plantation owner.

But that dependency is also a weakness. 

Hilary Clinton has been reduced to running the most explicitly racial campaign in history. Any state which doesn't choose her is accused of not being diverse enough. Accusations that Nevada was not diverse enough backfired. Hillary Clinton had assumed that she could count on the Latino vote while the Bernie Sanders campaign appeared to be trying to suppress Latino votes. But the actual results showed that Latino Democrats like Socialism more than they cared for Bill's Evita. Diversity was no longer a bonus. Instead the wrong kind of diversity had once again become a threat to Hillary Clinton.

The Democratic race now comes down to the question of whether the Sanders campaign can overcome the idol of Obama sitting on the mantel to lure away black voters. It comes down to an economic argument versus Hillary's rather shaky claim to racial loyalty that will vanish in a moment if Obama switches sides. Now more than ever, Hillary Clinton's political future depends on Barack Obama.

The trouble with Hillary putting all her political eggs in Obama's basket is that he does not like her and explicitly ran against her brand of politics. Philosophically he has far more in common with the Bernie Sanders version of Great Man Socialism which gets radical agendas done unilaterally than with Clintonesque political pragmatism. For now Obama has held to the terms of the 2012 deal but forces within the administration have been steadily undermining Hillary with leaks and investigations.

Obama is invested in Hillary 2016 only as a means of protecting his legacy. He will not go down with the S.S. Clinton just to protect her. Nor will he allow black voters to do so. His meeting with Bernie Sanders was far from an endorsement and he still resents Sanders for criticizing his progressive credentials, but if the Vermont Socialist becomes a viable candidate, Obama will switch his support to Bernie Sanders.

And so will Hillary's Black base. Black voters are Hillary's firewall and Obama has his finger on the button.

Hillary Clinton's real battle in the weeks ahead will be keeping black voters on the plantation. That will require her and Bernie Sanders to embrace increasingly radical and alienating policies that will do little to help black communities and that instead will actually go on hurting them.

Beyond the pro-crime policies of Black Lives Matter, pressure is mounting on Bernie Sanders to endorse reparations for slavery. If he does it, so will Hillary Clinton and that is exactly the sort of radical and alienating proposal likely to hurt her badly with voters in the general election.

Even as Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton fight over the black vote like two starving hounds, the outcome of that cynical competition may make the winner unelectable in the general election. And that is the problem with a political party dependent on cobbling together a coalition of minority groups with crude appeals to identity politics. Even one misstep in that identity politics juggling act may prove fatal.

Democrats have become undemocratic, sectarian, claustrophobic and alienating. The emphasis on base turnout has made their party more partisan and radical, gaining deeper but narrower support, contracting around its base rather than expanding. Democrats are losing locally while relying on vesting unlimited power in a heavily centralized government run by radicals whose views are at odds with most of the country. Their dictatorship of the proletariat is unstable and can fall at any time.

Plantation politics can only take Hillary Clinton and her party so far. And if black voters decide they don't want to do all of Miss Hillary's dirty work, then this time tomorrow will not be another day for her.



TOPICS: Government; History; Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: 2016election; afroturf; alsharpton; andrewcuomo; arkansas; astroturf; berniesanders; billdeblasio; blackkk; blackliesmatter; blacklivesmatter; chirlanemccray; danielgreenfield; election2016; frontpage; greenfield; hillary; hillaryclinton; hitlery; newyork; newyorkcity; nypd; rafaelramos; redistribution; reparations; rudolphholder; sultanknish; vermont; wenjianliu; whiteprivilege; wipewater

Front Page mag - A Project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center

Daniel Greenfield Ping List Notification of new articles.

I am posting Greenfield's articles from FrontPage and the Sultan Knish blog. FReepmail or drop me a comment to get on or off the Greenfield ping list.

I recommend an occasional look at the Sultan Knish blog. It is a rich source of materials, links and more from one of the preeminent writers of our age.

FrontPage is a basic resource for conservative thought. Lou

1 posted on 02/22/2016 4:50:47 AM PST by Louis Foxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell; daisy mae for the usa; AdvisorB; wizardoz; free-in-nyc; Vendome; Georgia Girl 2; ...

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam.

To get on or off the Greenfield ping list please reply to this post.

2 posted on 02/22/2016 4:51:57 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (Stop Islam and save the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

"Let them leave.
Even if they leave,
their votes, the votes of their unborn,
and the votes of their ancestors passed,
will all remain with me this election."

3 posted on 02/22/2016 4:53:22 AM PST by Diogenesis ("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
Considering how badly off the Obama years have left African-Americans, her ties to that era ought to be a minus, but a confused racial solidarity has taken Hillary from losing the black vote to becoming as dependent on black political labor as any plantation owner.

Yes, it's weird. Bill Clinton shared their culture, and Obama is their color, but Hillary?

4 posted on 02/22/2016 4:56:55 AM PST by Tax-chick (Four teenagers at once. I'm ready to lead the Forlorn Hope now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Somebody should remind blacks that the liberals situate their abortion clinics in their neighborhoods and herd black kids into horrible union controlled urban public schools while they themselves “choose” good schools for their kids.


5 posted on 02/22/2016 4:58:31 AM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Little has been made of the fact that only 80,000 democrat votes were cast in the Nevada primaries. Much has been made of extrapolating the results into a conclusion that African Americans are now in Hillary’s camp based on a small turnout. The republican gains made in the last elections were in large part made because minority turnout is poor when Barack Obama is not on the ballot.
It will interesting to see how many republicans vote in the Nevada primary.
Also will be interesting to see how many democrats vote in the South Carolina primary.
I see voter turnout as a real issue for Hillary.


6 posted on 02/22/2016 5:10:07 AM PST by Palio di Siena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

“I don’t feel no ways tired. I come too far from where I started from. Nobody told me that the road would be easy. I don’t believe He brought me this far to leave me.”

Interesting quote. Do you think Herself meant a word of it?

Herself is basically a very rude woman. Dialect before a black audience? And they stood for this insulting behavior?


7 posted on 02/22/2016 5:11:00 AM PST by alloysteel (If I considered the consequences of my actions, I would rarely do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

My reply is that, No, not many of them will leave the democrat party. However, there will be much less enthusiasm in the Black community for Hillary than Obama, which will put Black votes for a democrat president back to historic levels.

And by historic levels I mean the percentage Al Gore got, John Kerry got, and Mike Dukakis got. Hell, we could even back to Mondale. In the case of these 4, it wasn’t enough. Bill Clinton got more because, as we all know, he was our very first “Black President”. Still, keep in mind that Bill Clinton never got a majority of the votes, but rather a plurality. In fact, his 43% in 1992 was the same Dukakis lost by 4 years earlier.

Incidentally, I am in Alabama. I teach adults. Most of the Blacks I know are for Hillary, but without any enthusiasm. When she was beaten by Bernie in New Hampshire, many of the Blacks were surprised. They have a kind of fatalistic, but not following the election view of Clinton that Bernie’s win really surprised them.

I see a opportunity for Trump if he wins the GOP nod, but the media will fight hard to keep Blacks on the plantation. And sorry to say, they can be easily led (queue Trump burning churches, leading lynch mobs, etc.).


8 posted on 02/22/2016 5:11:49 AM PST by Alas Babylon! (As we say in the Air Force, "You know you're over the target when you start getting flak!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
I think the explanation is a lot simpler than that. What you have are two lefties doing what lefties do. They are trying to assemble enough afflicted groups together by promising them stuff.

Sanders does well with college students and the overly educated-under employed because they are betting on getting debt forgiveness. Clinton picked up Nevada because she got the unions to drag their members in to caucus for her. Old school constituency voting for the established party candidate.

It should be noted that the same unions supported Obama before. I am sure if we dig enough there would be some Clinton anti-semetic efforts against Sanders with certain constituencies, as well.

9 posted on 02/22/2016 5:12:49 AM PST by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Surely the Democrat party has more talented people to put forward than the socialist and the harridan. That they cannot be considered because of celebrity adoration is a reflection of our failing society.


10 posted on 02/22/2016 5:31:14 AM PST by ez (Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is... - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
And they stood for this insulting behavior?

If there were objections, I don't remember reading about it. Of course, the MSM wouldn't tell us.

11 posted on 02/22/2016 5:35:43 AM PST by Tax-chick (Four teenagers at once. I'm ready to lead the Forlorn Hope now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

They will only leave if they’re no ways tahrd.


12 posted on 02/22/2016 6:23:56 AM PST by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
In identity politics, the political is tribal and personal. Policies matter less than racial allegiances.

And it's happening among conservatives too now thanks to the Trump phenomenon.

When Sanders protested that he should be allowed to disagree with Obama on occasion, black voters clearly disagreed. The black vote has been tragically distilled to personal and tribal allegiance to Obama.

One wonders why they continue to pretend to be chrstians considering their across-the-board radicalism on all issues. Have they condemned Robert Mugabe as an "uncle tom homophobe" yet???

13 posted on 02/22/2016 7:15:25 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (The "end of history" will be worldwide Judaic Theocracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
Even as Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton fight over the black vote like two starving hounds, the outcome of that cynical competition may make the winner unelectable in the general election. And that is the problem with a political party dependent on cobbling together a coalition of minority groups with crude appeals to identity politics. Even one misstep in that identity politics juggling act may prove fatal.

Bernie won't compromise his beliefs in order to win... he's too old and set in his ways to become a typical lying lowlife democrat...

14 posted on 02/22/2016 8:56:26 AM PST by GOPJ ("Please explain why Hillary Clinton felt the need to own a private server." H.A. Goodman - Salon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
But the actual results showed that Latino Democrats like Socialism more than they cared for Bill's Evita. Diversity was no longer a bonus. Instead the wrong kind of diversity had once again become a threat to Hillary Clinton.

Trump made serious inroads with the Hispanic vote too... Wouldn't it be a hoot if blacks became the Democrat party and Hispanics came with us?

15 posted on 02/28/2016 10:25:52 AM PST by GOPJ ("during ... time of universal deceit, telling the truth became a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson