Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

India: Ultralite .22 Revolver Developed for Self Defense
Gun Watch ^ | 14 February, 2016 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 02/15/2016 6:46:49 AM PST by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Jewbacca

I have no idea how well they work. This is similar to how a Browning belt fed works.
http://www.bobergarms.com/


21 posted on 02/15/2016 8:19:00 AM PST by CrazyIvan (Socialists are just communists in their larval stage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

If it was ‘86, then it’s been 30 years. Hopefully the increased awareness about womens’ security will raise the pressure on the government to reconsider that ban. It obviously hasn’t stopped the “bad guys” from getting weapons when they wish to (as is par for the course with every gun ban ever).


22 posted on 02/15/2016 8:25:31 AM PST by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Gadsden1st
Bottom line, doesn’t it come down to “Holy S#IT!”, “Run Away”, or “I am so out of it on drugs, you better have a double barrel shotgun!”?

Bottom line, the average mugger is not a member of Spetsnaz, able to take multiple body hits and spit them back at the attacker. The sudden appearance of a gun in the hands of a good guy will usually cause him to drop his can of purple drank and skittles and skedaddle.

Of course "stopping power" is another issue. This always begs the question, how good of a shot you are?

A .22 LR will do the job if shot that penetrates the brain stem, and it will drop him just as quickly as a larger caliber. Most people aren't good enough shooters to do that to a moving target intent on attacking you.

23 posted on 02/15/2016 8:33:32 AM PST by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cen-Tejas

The .380 out of a short barrel is quite a bit more powerful than a .22 out of a short barrel.

I would expect the .380 to have about 162 foot pounds, and the .22 to have (out of that short barrel), about 50 foot pounds.

So it is not quite “infinitely” more powerful.


24 posted on 02/15/2016 8:52:37 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
India does not have a “gun culture” as does the United States. Because firearms and ammunition are so highly restricted in the Subcontinent, there is little pressure on manufacturers to do due diligence with their quality assurance.

That is not to say the Indians cannot built good equipment. I have a Rifle Factory Ishapore-built No. 2A1 rifle (7.62 NATO version of the No. 1 Mk III SMLE) and it is a very solid, accurate rifle. (The 2A1 is NOT a converted war production .303 SMLE; it is a new rifle built of mondern materials.) However, without the pressure of a vital customer base to influence quality control, this attention can often not get the attention that it should.

As you say, revolvers are pretty simple creatures and there's no reason why India can't build one better than the cheap German RG-14. (Cheap it may have been, but the RG-14 did hold together and shoot.) I'd hope that an Indian customer, after jumping through all sorts of bureaucratic hoops, finally plunks down his 5,000 rupees ($72.41 USD) and gets a quality pistol. If I didn't, I'd be p.o.’ed. [Here's a thought: maybe the Germans could sell RG-14's to India. Nah.]

25 posted on 02/15/2016 9:11:23 AM PST by MasterGunner01 ( To err is hupman, to forgive is not our policy -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

“That is not to say the Indians cannot built good equipment. I have a Rifle Factory Ishapore-built No. 2A1 rifle (7.62 NATO version of the No. 1 Mk III SMLE) and it is a very solid, accurate rifle. (The 2A1 is NOT a converted war production .”

I have two of those. Real gems they are. Super quick bolt actions and are shockingly accurate. At 400 yards I have no trouble ringing an old ten inch cast iron skillet every time.

I paid $110 a piece for them and wish I’d bought half a dozen when they were available.

I sporterized one and kept the other one pretty much stock. Although a friend did send me a set of drill stocks which I cleaned up. It’s pretty much mint now.

I was stunned to see the Indian authorities using them during the Mumbai attacks.

Nice to run into someone else who owns one of those. I think they’re superb all things considered.

L


26 posted on 02/15/2016 9:21:31 AM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

The revolver is priced (wholesale) at 35,000 rupees, or about $514. I understand that there is about another $200 tax when it is purchased.

You are exactly correct about the lack of competition.

As for “gun culture” there appears to be something out there. It is not anywhere as widespread or as deep rooted as American gun culture, but there is, at mimimum, a group of enthusiasts in the middle and upper classes, who believe the excessive controls are stupid; that people have a right to defend themselves, and that much of the bureaucracy is counterproductive.


27 posted on 02/15/2016 9:26:10 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

“That is not to say the Indians cannot built good equipment. I have a Rifle Factory Ishapore-built No. 2A1 rifle (7.62 NATO version of the No. 1 Mk III SMLE) and it is a very solid, accurate rifle. (The 2A1 is NOT a converted war production .”

I had a few of them. They seemed serviceable, but I experienced feed problems with the last couple of rounds out of the magazine in more than one example.


28 posted on 02/15/2016 9:28:42 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

That’s too bad. The ones I got didn’t appear to have ever even been fired. I’ve had no issues at all with them. I do believe I paid the extra $10 for “hand select” ones, which probably has nothing whatsoever to so with it.

IIRC magazine capacity is 12 but I’ve never put more than 10 in at a time.

Best,

L


29 posted on 02/15/2016 10:40:18 AM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Ok, it’s 3 times more powerful.

Thanks for the correction.


30 posted on 02/15/2016 11:29:09 AM PST by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; MasterGunner01

Umm, India does have a “thriving” gun culture. Only problem is its mostly of the illegal variety, revolving around country-made use-and-throw pistols. They get used a lot in petty gang/caste/political disputes in North Indian states.

Do a search for country-made guns in India.


31 posted on 02/15/2016 10:05:17 PM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Yes, the “country-made” guns are available for about $10-$15.

For more money, you can get a revolver, a bit more, a semi-auto.

It isn’t just India. Where the restrictions are stiff, the small shop guns show up. Brazil seems to specialize in sub-machine guns.


32 posted on 02/16/2016 4:49:25 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
It never ceases to amaze me that despite draconian gun control laws and the UK and India, there still exists a thriving trade in black market ordnance. It may be homemade, bu the stuff still works to do various deeds.

During the 19th century, no Englishman ever questioned gun ownership. I doubt whether that unquestioned ‘right’ applied to native peoples in the British Empire. However, gun control in the UK seems to have gotten its start as a result of the Easter Rising revolt by the Irish in 1916 while the UK was embroiled in the First World War. Lots of bad laws resulted, including the first gun control acts.

The plight of shooters in the UK deteriorated until, but the start of World War 2, the British were very short of arms to fend of an anticipated German invasion after the evacuation of their Army from Dunkirk. The U.S. sent all sorts of war reserve arms and private arms to the British. At the end of the war, these guns were either destroyed or returned to the US.

The situation has deteriorated ever since to the point self-defense is not recognized as a legitimate defense in court. The bad guys have more rights than the victim. And now the British are looking to ‘knife control’ so solve their crime problems. This is insanity. It appears that the whole Commonwealth has caught the gun control disease.

33 posted on 02/16/2016 6:34:37 AM PST by MasterGunner01 ( To err is hupman, to forgive is not our policy -- SEAL Team SIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson