Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz "Birther" Suit Attorney Suspended From Practice?
Behind Enemy Lines ^ | 01/15/2016 | Gene Berardelli

Posted on 01/26/2016 6:40:33 AM PST by SeekAndFind

It appears that the attorney who filed the so-called "birther" lawsuit "in pro se" against Texas Senator Ted Cruz, Newton B. Schwartz, Sr., has some ethical and legal issues of his own.  


In documents obtained from the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania court system, an attorney by the same name was "suspended on consent" from practice in 2015 by the State of Pennsylvania for  "engaging in the unauthorized practice of law" in the state of Louisiana - a state where he was not licensed to practice.

READ THE FULL TEXT HERE

The documents also refers to Mr. Schwartz's age (at the time, he was 84 years old) and that he was also licensed to practice law in Texas out of the same Houston office.  

According to Rule 8.05(a) of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, "In addition to being answerable for his or her conduct occurring in this state, any such lawyer also may be disciplined in this state for conduct occurring in another jurisdiction or resulting in lawyer discipline in another jurisdiction, if it is professional misconduct under Rule 8.04."

According to Rule 8.04 of the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer shall not, among other things "engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation", such as engaging in the unauthorized practice of law in another jurisdiction, may result in discipline. 



TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 01152016; attorney; birther; lawsuit; naturalborncitizen; repositorycruz; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 01/26/2016 6:40:34 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There are several suits.

One most likely to proceed was filed by another presidential candidate. A minor candidate but she has standing.


2 posted on 01/26/2016 6:47:16 AM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Who cares?

Both Oboma AND Michelle lost their Illinois law licesense ... And nobody who votes democrat in his ABCNNBCBS press corpse cared.


3 posted on 01/26/2016 6:47:43 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
it means every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.

John Armor Bingham (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866))

John Armor Bingham (January 21, 1815-March 19, 1900) was an American Republican congressman from the U.S. state of Ohio, judge advocate in the trial of the Abraham Lincoln assassination and a prosecutor in the impeachment trials of Andrew Johnson. He is also the principal framer of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The first section of the second article of the Constitution uses the language, a natural-born citizen. It thus assumes that citizenship may be acquired by birth. Undoubtedly, this language of the Constitution was used in reference to that principle of public law, well understood in this country at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, which referred citizenship to the place of birth.

Justice Curtis in his dissenting opinion of the Dred Scott decision and speaking specifically of natural born citizens and article II, section I, clause 5

It is an established maxim that birth is a criterion of allegiance. Birth however derives its force sometimes from place and sometimes from parentage, but in general place is the most certain criterion; it is what applies in the United States; it will therefore be unnecessary to investigate any other.

James Madison

The doctrine of the common law is that every man born within its jurisdiction is a subject of the sovereign of the country where he is born, and allegiance is not personal to the sovereign in the extent that has been contended for; it is due to him in his political capacity of sovereign of the territory where the person owing the allegiance as born.

Kilham v. Ward 2 Mass. 236, 26 (1806)

As the President is required to be a native citizen of the United States. Natives are all persons born within the jurisdiction and allegiance of the United States.

James Kent, COMMENTARIES ON AMERICAN LAW (1826)

That provision in the constitution which requires that the president shall be a native-born citizen (unless he were a citizen of the United States when the constitution was adopted) is a happy means of security against foreign influence, A very respectable political writer makes the following pertinent remarks upon this subject. Prior to the adoption of the constitution, the people inhabiting the different states might be divided into two classes: natural born citizens, or those born within the state, and aliens, or such as were born out of it.

St. George Tucker, BLACKSTONE'S COMMENTARIES (1803)

Allegiance is nothing more than the tie or duty of obedience of a subject to the sovereign under whose protection he is, and allegiance by birth is that which arises from being born within the dominions and under the protection of a particular sovereign. Two things usually concur to create citizenship: first, birth locally within the dominions of the sovereign, and secondly, birth within the protection and obedience, or, in other words, within the allegiance of the sovereign.That the father and mother of the demandant were British born subjects is admitted. If he was born before 4 July, 1776, it is as clear that he was born a British subject. If he was born after 4 July, 1776, and before 15 September, 1776 [the date the British occupied New York], he was born an American citizen, whether his parents were at the time of his birth British subjects or American citizens. Nothing is better settled at the common law than the doctrine that the children even of aliens born in a country while the parents are resident there under the protection of the government and owing a temporary allegiance thereto are subjects by birth.

Justice Story, concurring opinion,Inglis v. Sailorsâ Snug Harbor, 3 Pet. 99, 155,164. (1830)

The country where one is born, how accidental soever his birth in that place may have been, and although his parents belong to another country, is that to which he owes allegiance. Hence the expression natural born subject or citizen, & all the relations thereout growing. To this there are but few exceptions, and they are mostly introduced by statutes and treaty regulations, such as the children of seamen and ambassadors born abroad, and the like.

Leake v. Gilchrist, 13 N.C. 73 (N.C. 1829)

Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity.

William Rawle, A View of the Constitution of the United States, pg. 86 (1829)

The right of citizenship never descends in the legal sense, either by the common law or under the common naturalization acts. It is incident to birth in the country, or it is given personally by statute. The child of an alien, if born in the country, is as much a citizen as the natural born child of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle

Horace Binney, American Law Register, 2 Amer.Law Reg.193, 203, 204, 206, 208 (February 1854).

That all natural born citizens, or persons born within the limits of the United States, and all aliens subject to the restrictions hereinafter mentioned, may inherit real estate and make their pedigree by descent from any ancestor lineal or collateral.

January 28, 1838, Acts of the State of Tennessee passed at the General Assembly, pg. 266 (1838)

The term citizen, was used in the constitution as a word, the meaning of which was already established and well understood. And the constitution itself contains a direct recognition of the subsisting common law principle, in the section which defines the qualification of the President. The only standard which then existed, of a natural born citizen, was the rule of the common law, and no different standard has been adopted since. Suppose a person should be elected President who was native born, but of alien parents, could there be any reasonable doubt that he was eligible under the constitution? I think not.

Lynch vs. Clarke (NY 1844)

Every person, then, born in the country, and that shall have attained the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States, is eligible to the office of president.

Lysander Spooner, The Unconstitionality of Slavery, pg. 119 (1845)

It is the very essence of the condition of a natural born citizen, of one who is a member of the state by birth within and under it, that his rights are not derived from the mere will of the state.

The New Englander, Vol. III, pg. 434 (1845)

This is called becoming naturalized; that is, becoming entitled to all the rights and privileges of natural born citizens, or citizens born in this country.

Andrew White Young, First lessons in Civil Government, pg. 82 (1856).

The Constitution itself does not make the citizens, (it is. in fact,made by them.) It only intends and recognizes such of them as are natural—home-born—and provides for the naturalization of such of them as were alien—foreign-born—making the latter, as far as nature will allow, like the former.

Attorney General Bates, Opinion of Citizenship, (1862)

All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England.

Justice Swayne, United States v. Rhodes, 1 Abbott, US 28 (Cir. Ct. Ky 1866)

Natural-born Citizens, those that are born within the jurisdiction of a national government; i.e., in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens, temporarily residing abroad.

William Cox Cochran, The student's law lexicon: a dictionary of legal words and phrases : with appendices, Pg. 185 (1888)

Citizens are either natural-born or naturalized. One who is born in the United States or under its jurisdiction is a natural-born citizen without reference to the nationality of his parents. Their presence here constitutes a temporary allegiance, sufficient to make a child a citizen.

Theodore Dwight, Edward Dwight, Commentaries on the law of persons and personal property, pg. 125 (1894)

The notion that there is any common law principle to naturalize the children born in foreign countries, of native-born American father and mother, father or mother, must be discarded. There is not, and never was, any such common law principle.

Binney on Alienigenae, 14, 20; 2 Amer.Law Reg.199, 203

4 posted on 01/26/2016 6:47:50 AM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Very interesting, but a person doesn’t have to be a lawyer to file a suit.


5 posted on 01/26/2016 6:49:31 AM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s the Illinois ballot challenge that will have legs.
Attorney there was a colleague of Phillip Berg in the Case that went to SCOTUS. He is knowledgeable on the subject.
The response is in works. More should be coming out in next few days
Illinois SoS is a D who has served several terms in office. He’s already referred it to election board. They meet in 2-3 weeks. Cruz will have to hire lawyers to defend the constitution as a living document which should be an eye opener to constitutionist conservatives


6 posted on 01/26/2016 6:49:35 AM PST by hoosiermama (Make America Great Again by uniting Great Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC one
 photo image_zpscwekop9t.jpeg  photo image_zpsnbbj6d4r.jpeg
7 posted on 01/26/2016 6:51:02 AM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

The Canadian Citizenship Act came into effect on 1 January 1947 under the government of Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King. The act established Canadian citizenship as a distinct category and allowed residents of Canada to obtain citizenship regardless of their country of origin.[1] Prior to 1947, individuals born in Canada and naturalized immigrants were classified as British subjects rather than Canadian citizens.

8 posted on 01/26/2016 6:56:18 AM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RC one
 photo image_zpsknpmdlmm.jpeg
9 posted on 01/26/2016 6:56:30 AM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RC one
Rogers v Bellei, 1971  photo image_zpsycwx9vum.jpeg
10 posted on 01/26/2016 6:59:20 AM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RC one
 photo image_zpsz3ukpivk.jpeg
11 posted on 01/26/2016 7:02:38 AM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2

Thank you for your informative posts.


12 posted on 01/26/2016 7:03:23 AM PST by hoosiermama (Make America Great Again by uniting Great Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2
 photo image_zpsjfww0vvx.jpeg
13 posted on 01/26/2016 7:05:04 AM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot2
When I say, that an alien is one who is born out of the king's dominions, or allegiance, this also must be understood with some restrictions. The common law indeed stood absolutely so; with only a very few exceptions: so that a particular act of parliament became necessary after the restoration, for the naturalization of children of his majesty's English subjects, born in foreign countries during the late troubles. And this maxim of the law proceeded upon a general principle, that every man owes natural allegiance where he is born, and cannot owe two such allegiances, or serve two masters, at once.

William Blackstone, Commentaries 1:354, 357--58, 361--62

1765

14 posted on 01/26/2016 7:05:44 AM PST by RC one ("...all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens" US v. WKA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I woukd like to read about that. Would you link or provide more information please
As a candidate she would have standing. Otoh Keyes was ruled not to have standing because he wasn’t a contender


15 posted on 01/26/2016 7:06:53 AM PST by hoosiermama (Make America Great Again by uniting Great Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Impy

Thought you might like this.

FRegards ....


16 posted on 01/26/2016 7:07:51 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Cruz and Trump FRiends strongest when we don't insult each other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Court won’t care. He’s filing pro se.


17 posted on 01/26/2016 7:09:35 AM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Prag is the opponent on the primary ballot, in NH. I think the venue her case is presently in is the election commission, not yet before a state court. She has to lose in the lower venue to obtain jurisdition in state court. “Exhaust her remedies”


18 posted on 01/26/2016 7:10:39 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RC one

Pls cite SCOTUS Ted Cruz birth abroad citizenship to an alien and US citizen is a natural born citizen or eligible campaign for US president.


19 posted on 01/26/2016 7:10:59 AM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RC one
Ted Cruz needs the 1952 Naturalization Act....  photo image_zps4jy1yuul.jpeg
20 posted on 01/26/2016 7:13:21 AM PST by bushpilot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson