Wait a second here. Since the Constitution never actually defines the term "natural born citizen," and thus is falls to Congress to define that term, isn't its doing so by statute in effect (per the argument made in this post) making EVERYONE a "naturalized" citizen?
Natural Born citizen already has a definition, derived from Natural Law, well known to the founding fathers. That is why they provided no definition for it in the constitutional text itself. It's meaning was common knowledge.
Bingo! But this concept is way too difficult for the small minded among us to grasp.
No, it doesn't. Congress has no such power.
It’s no fair pointing out that Farmer John’s argument is circular and/or self-refuting.
Every person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States, and needs no naturalization. A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized,
again...Every person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States, and needs no naturalization...
Two Citizen parents are subject to the jurisduition of the USA, and no other Country. Thus, their baby born on US soil is a natural born citizen. No need to look at laws created by congress to referee whether a person can apply for naturalized citizenship