EPA De-Develops the US Through Nebulous Consensus Climate Change

Canada Free Press ^ | 08/10/15 | Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh

[Sean_Anthony]

Real Science vs. government funded pseudo science:

Several presentations at the Doctors for Disaster Preparedness in Ontario, California, dealt with the issues of anthropogenic global warming promoted by the climate change industry.

Dr. S. Fred Singer, founder of the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP), and Ken Haapala, current president of SEPP, discussed the “National Environment Assessment: Peeling the Speculative Onion.” Haapala spoke of “climate fears and finance” and our government’s limitations on CO2 emissions as a “policy in search of a problem.”

Because the global warming (climate change) predictions have proven inaccurate, the fear of non-existent anthropogenic global warming should be called correctly “projections,” said Haapala. “None of the models have undergone the rigorous scientific testing required for verification and validation.”

Satellite images taken since December 1978 provided the most rigorous and comprehensive data measured in the mid-troposphere. It is where the greenhouse gas effect takes place. According to Haapala, four sets of measurements taken with weather balloons by two independent groups agree closely. But a weather balloon does not cover the globe “comprehensively” and surface measurements are taken on land when 71 percent of Earth’s surface is covered by oceans.

[sauropod]

bfl

[econjack]

The really bad thing here is that Congress has abdicated its responsibility to oversee the EPA...which it doesn’t, and hasn’t for years. There is considerable evidence to suggest Congress isn’t even reading the new rules and regulations coming from the EPA. The result has been an avalanche of rules and regulations that have strangled the US economy. Congress either needs to wrest control back from the EPA or cut it off at the knees before it’s too late.

[fella]

Bump for later reading.