Posted on 06/29/2015 9:17:41 AM PDT by John Semmens
In Kansas, Shawnee County District Court Judge Larry Hendricks issued an order blocking that states ban on abortions carried out by tearing the baby limb-from-limb while still in the womb. The Judges order came in response to a lawsuit filed by the New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights on behalf of Dr. Herbert Hodes and Dr. Traci Nausera father-daughter team of abortionists.
To allow this law to go into effect while the matter is being litigated would deprive the plaintiffs of their livelihood, Hendricks said. It would inflict irreparable harm and injury to their recognized right to ply their trade. Hendricks contrasted this recognized right with the speculative contention that the fetuses subjected to this procedure might endure excruciating pain or other significant losses.
In 1973, the highest authority in the land decreed that women have a right to obtain an abortion, Hendricks observed. It is bad enough that subordinate jurisdictions have repeatedly tried to legislate restrictions to this right, but to permit any limits during litigation would elevate the lesser authority over the supreme authority.
Hendricks dismissed arguments that women in dire need of this procedure could, in the interim, travel to less restrictive states as cruel and unduly burdensome on the patients and economically devastating to the plaintiffs. Why should a woman be inconvenienced in any way in the exercise of this fundamental right? Why should two doctors have to lose a single dollar of income while awaiting a courts decision to void this law?
Dr. Hodes called Hendricks ruling a victory for women against the insidious invasion of their bodies by unwanted tissue.
In related news, a group of Satan worshipers are suing the State of Missouri over its abortion restrictions. Specifically, they are contesting the state requirement that women be informed of the fetus ability to feel pain at 22 weeks. We do not recognize the fetus as a separate living entity, declared Sybil Hagman, attorney for the Jane Doe plaintiff. A state law asserting that the fetus might suffer pain directly contradicts our plaintiffs religious beliefs. It violates her freedom of religion. Hagman offered to drop the lawsuit if Satan worshipers were exempted from this provision of the law.
if you missed any of this week's other semi-news/semi-satire posts you can find them at...
http://azconservative.org/2015/06/27/supreme-court-rewrites-obamacare/
EXCELLENT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.