Watch this: Full Speech Trump Presidential Announcement

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/06/16/full_speech_donald_trumps_presidential_announcemen ^ | 6/16/2015 | Realclearpolitics

[Jane Long]

Generation Spread the Achievements and PC BS.

[South40]

Do you wear purple on Thursdays, or Pink?

Your lame attempts at insulting me don't make your point, they only make you look foolish. Take a look at my profile page. I wear red white and blue on Thursdays as I bury American heros.

Do you believe a candidate saying "Who the hell would vote for that guy?" is presidential? It's not. It is likely to be construed to be as looney as Howard Dean was when he screamed.

Trump's loonieness may resonate with a few, you included, but it will never get him elected. In fact, it doesn't set well with many in the party.

[HLPhat]

>>”Who the hell would vote for that guy?”

Well, who the hell would?

I mean... other than RINOcratic herd animals who prefer their turds to be polished by professional bureaucratic parasites who’ve been pulling the panache out of their arses for the last 15+ years.

[dragnet2]

How could anyone watch that speech then claim Trump was “ill-mannered”.

He was bold, confident, passionate and all backed with high levels of success. The man built an entire empire.

What did the others do?

The insider private political garden parties and phony backslapping bureaucratic decorum should be mocked for what it is.

I’ve had more than enough.

[HLPhat]

>>Generation Spread the Achievements and PC BS.

Generation "From each according to their ability; to each according to their need".

[HLPhat]

>>In fact, it doesn't set well with many in the party.

Well Gee Opie -- GOOD!

Because some of us have had enough of the stench of their RINO dung, wafting over (what's left of) the Republic, that they've been busy fertilizing the shrubbery with.

[dragnet2]

I like that! What a bell ringer.

Excellent.

[South40]

Well, who the hell would?

Whether they would vote for him [Bush] or not wasn't the issue. It was Trump's boorish delivery, which reveals him to be an unpolished turd. If you want Trump as your Republican nominee you should want him to be more refined. As he is, he is going nowhere.

[dragnet2]

It was Trump's boorish delivery, which reveals him to be an unpolished turd.

Stick with the silver tongued devils and wordsmith wonks. They'll eloquently piss on you while telling you it's raining.

Break out the umbrellas.

[South40]

Opinions vary. I believe he is ill-mannered and is anything but presidential.

While we're on the subject of opinions...do you agree with his position on banning "assault weapons"?

What about his position on extending the waiting period on gun sales?

[dragnet2]

In fact, (Trump) doesn't set well with many in the party.

What an incredible comment.

[South40]

What an incredible comment.

lol! I'm glad you liked it. Here's another. Rick Perry's got to be enjoying this as he will no longer be considered the biggest joke in the race.

Still no comment on Trump's anti gun positions?

[Fledermaus]

Pay attention to his stance on issues over the years. Your euphoria over one red-meat speech is disingenuous to me.

[HLPhat]

>>It was Trump’s boorish delivery,

Me thinks perhaps the “boorish”ness is in the eye of the perceiver.

I thought he came across as honest, confident, and nailed every resonant point.

I could care less if he appeals to the self-anointed drunken “party” swine — in fact the more he makes them pee in their bunched up panties the better.

NO MORE MILK AND APPLE SOUP FOR THEM!

[South40]

Me thinks perhaps the “boorish”ness is in the eye of the perceiver.

I couldn't agree more. But my objections to Trump are based on more than his boorishness. Did you know he favors banning so-called "assault weapons" and is for extending the waiting periods for gun purchases? Add that to his other liberal leanings and he's just not conservative enough for me. Your results may vary.

[dragnet2]

You obviously didn’t listen to his speech last night about the 2nd Amendment.

BTW, he covered just about every big issue last night, and what he said I very much support. All of it.

I’ve seen and heard all the other bureaucrats running. They don’t come close. This guy actually does big things. The others made a living playing bureaucrat while on the government payroll.

Most capable of critical thought who watched the speech will no doubt agree.

[South40]

I listened and heard every word. Given his past, I just don't believe him. You are apparently unaware of his anti-gun history. Lucky for you, I'll be happy to share.

On guns: “The Republicans walk the NRA line and refuse even limited restrictions. I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I also support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun.”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3301079/posts

[HLPhat]

>>Pay attention to his stance on issues over the years

""Donald, go on the record," says Stern. "You're for gay marriage."

"Well, I'm not," responds Trump, surprising both Stern and his co-host Robin Quivers. He continues, "It's never been an argument that's been discussed with me very much. People know that it's not my thing one way or the other."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/07/donald-trump-gay-marriage-not-my-thing_n_2637646.html

The guy thinks for himself, has produced results without suckling from the family tree, and isn't a McSheeple -- rainbow or otherwise.

[dragnet2]

Your euphoria over one red-meat speech is disingenuous to me.

It's real. Trust me.

Red meat?

I'll take his red meat over the diet of tofu and sides of BS served up by the bureaucrats who've robbed America while lining their own pockets for decades now.

[right way right]

This is very dangerous when one lacks any morals and has such a sick perverted love for money.
You trust this proven dirt bag?

We may just have the perfect storm of Godlessness to elect such as swine as Trump.