Brad Thor's message for Pamela Geller's critics: You are pansies

TheBlaze Books ^ | 2015-06-12 | Benjamin Weingarten

[fredericbastiat1]

The First Amendment exists to protect speech you don’t agree with. It actually is there — if all that was worthy of protection was speech everybody agreed with, we wouldn’t need the First Amendment. OK.

So you don’t have to agree with what Pamela Geller is doing, but my G-d, Pamela Geller is doing more to help reform Islam than any pansy on the left or right who is criticizing her.

And I don’t care who criticized her. I don’t care who it is: You are weak, and you’re a pansy for not standing behind her.

It makes no sense to me that you would not support someone who is trying to bring about reform in one of the most dangerous ideologies since Nazism. And it actually predates Nazism, so I can’t say it’s since Nazism.

This idea that Pamela Geller somehow deserved what they got — and she’s making it worse for people. You know I heard people say “Well why provoke all Muslims?” She’s not trying to provoke all Muslims. She’s trying to provoke a discussion.

[jsanders2001]

me thinks she’s warning people that our own government is sponsoring terrorism against its own people by assisting them with refugee importation programs, supplying them with weapons, and deceiving them with an infiltrator agent not just letting them know that the peaceful Muslims want to cut off your head if you draw or insult their founder...

[Guenevere]

Bttt

[CharlesOConnell]

Great. Now what’s his plan to overcome the ISIS social media network and convince all the world’s wingnuts to stay home and especially not to play with explosives?

[gop4lyf]

Brad Thor is one of my favorite authors. Those of you who are interested in some summer reading ought to check him out.

[longfellow]

You can call it Nazism. Did he ever hear of the farhud?
ss trained Muslims that were more brutal than the Nazis.

[lavaroise]

Not only pamsies but traitors. They basically acuse her of all the geiefs done on islam, real or imagined,mthat they themselves habe been “guilty” of.

The hypocrisy reeks and disgusts me. This is on the level of obsenity of Christ’s crucifiction.

[lavaroise]

Not only pamsies but traitors. They basically acuse her of all the griefs done on islam, real or imagined,that they themselves have been “guilty” of.

The hypocrisy reeks and disgusts me. This is on the level of obsenity of Christ’s crucifixion. They might as well blame a video after Ben Gahzi.

[tet68]

Since you cannot have organs of internal security
without an internal threat, the liberals are importing
it, in the belief that their political opponents can
be gathered in the same net.

Every thing else is collateral damage.

[jsanders2001]

> Since you cannot have organs of internal security without an internal threat, the liberals are importing it, in the belief that their political opponents can be gathered in the same net. Every thing else is collateral damage.

That reminds me of a certain mosque where they were chanting death to America and a bomb went off...

[Popman]

Since you cannot have organs of internal security without an internal threat, the liberals are importing it, in the belief that their political opponents can be gathered in the same net.

That's an very interesting theory or observation, one I have not considered before...

That theory falls in line with several facets of dialectic Marxism...

[tet68]

That theory falls in line with several facets of dialectic Marxism...

That is where it comes from, and apparently where we
are going, so no surprise. In order for internal security
organs to justify their existence (and continued growth)
threats to internal security must and will be found...
or created.

Will the Enabling Act of 2015 be passed today?

I fear for our Republic.

[Popman]

——In order for internal security
organs to justify their existence (and continued growth)
threats to internal security must and will be found...
or created.——

One insidious way the progressives are achieving that goal is by promoting the perception that fundamental Christians. (All at some point) are no different than radical Muslims....

I check out the blog sewers of deranged left to see what is in their corrupted little minds...almost invariable whenever a event or story happens where Christians are involved they genuflect that they are the same as the Taliban or ISIL, cut from the same cloth...

In other words dangerous...and need to be targeted...