Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenfield: The Deconstruction of Marriage
Sultan Knish blog ^ | Wednesday, April 15, 2015 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 04/15/2015 4:58:04 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: hinckley buzzard

Daniel makes a critically salient point picked up by several readers here. Progressivism is all about deconstruction to the point of nihilism. This is the primary task of Marxism, to destroy every vestige of cultural tradition. The end result is absolute tyranny by an all powerful state.

Strangely it is Islam that reminds us daily that we are engaged in a spiritual war for the very existence of humanity. OUR leaders wish only to deny any spiritual dimension. Chaos and conflagration are the goals of both Islam and western political leadership. Both are the enemy of mankind and are at war with the peace of God.


21 posted on 04/15/2015 5:39:39 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

You have a valid point. He is clearly using gender to mean sex. 2 years ago that was a legitimate distinction. The meaning of gender has shifted in just the way he describes as the very purpose of progressive deconstruction. A word that meant something very specific just a few years ago means something completely opposite today. That is the very case he is making in this article.


22 posted on 04/15/2015 5:44:21 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
Wait with baited breath for HG to sling a one liner. Maybe someone should post an article from their blog and draw him out.
23 posted on 04/15/2015 5:45:10 PM PDT by Engedi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

I agree that he’s using gender to mean sex. However, he’s also using gender to mean gender. Maybe he’s pursuing deep irony, but unfortunately, once we surrender the distinction between biology and society, we’ve got no argument against 51 “genders.”


24 posted on 04/15/2015 5:46:59 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I'm a radical feminist. Galatians 3:28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Agreed. It would be worthwhile to post this issue on his blog. He responds to each post as needed.


25 posted on 04/15/2015 5:50:55 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I’m a radical masculinist( Galatians 3:28)


26 posted on 04/15/2015 5:54:19 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

LOL - good one!


27 posted on 04/15/2015 5:54:50 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I'm a radical feminist. Galatians 3:28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
once we surrender the distinction between biology and society, we’ve got no argument against 51 “genders.”

Precisely, and well put. That particular weirdness has a fairly short self life, IMHO. The Left has managed to bully "Gender" into questionnaires with M and F as the possible answers, which is precisely what "gender" does NOT mean in the ideology of the 51 Flavors Left. They can't have it both ways. That one they're going to lose.

This is being walked, step by step, toward violence. The Left has already employed the violence of the state in the coercion of Christian merchants and gotten away with it. At least for now. Blowback is coming and it isn't going to be pretty when it happens.

28 posted on 04/15/2015 5:55:42 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Agreed. A moral and righteous people will tolerate malice for a time but only for a time.


29 posted on 04/15/2015 6:02:26 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

A keeper!


30 posted on 04/15/2015 6:04:54 PM PDT by lulu16 (May the Good Lord take a liking to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill; Tax-chick

” This is being walked, step by step, toward violence. The Left has already employed the violence of the state in the coercion of Christian merchants and gotten away with it. At least for now.”

Herein lies the problem with bully/cowards

They may be bullies, but we aren’t cowards. They are.


31 posted on 04/15/2015 6:09:30 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

I agree. The current leftist line on “gender” - which insists that biological sex is imaginary - is too nutty to be sustainable.


32 posted on 04/15/2015 6:10:25 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I'm a radical feminist. Galatians 3:28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Most guys like girls, not other guys. Most girls like guys, not other girls. Most guys and girls would like to find a mate and start a family and be together for the rest of their lives. Most of these guys and girls, I wager, tolerate but don’t really approve non-guy-girl marriages, but most of them think gays should not be mistreated and so are tolerant and the gay thing doesn’t affect their lives anyway. Most of these people are not political junkies.

I don’t worry about the sacred institution of guy-girl marriage being pushed aside.


33 posted on 04/15/2015 6:13:24 PM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

If I was a coward, I wouldn’t have ten children.


34 posted on 04/15/2015 6:13:25 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I'm a radical feminist. Galatians 3:28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

“You can destroy it by outlawing it or by eliminating its meaningfulness until it becomes so open that it is absurd.”

It could only be destroyed by ‘outlawing it’ for those who rely on the state to create marriage for them. As far as eliminating its meaning, that also only works for those who get their definition of marriage by whatever judges, pols or the voting public think it should be at any one time. For many the state hasn’t had the right meaning for centuries.

Freegards


35 posted on 04/15/2015 6:16:10 PM PDT by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; All

” If I was a coward, I wouldn’t have ten children.”

Post of the Month !!


36 posted on 04/15/2015 6:17:58 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

I refuse to accede to gender roles - I have short hair - but I have mastered the basic biological functions.


37 posted on 04/15/2015 6:26:29 PM PDT by Tax-chick (I'm a radical feminist. Galatians 3:28)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I would sayyou wrote the book on it!


38 posted on 04/15/2015 6:29:57 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I would sayyou wrote the book on it!


39 posted on 04/15/2015 6:29:57 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

“but I repeat myself” Mark Twain


40 posted on 04/15/2015 6:30:47 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (My Batting Average( 1,000) (GOPe is that easy to read))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson