Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Industry and Economics of Climate Change/ Global Warming
Canada Free Press ^ | 12/07/14 | Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh

Posted on 12/07/2014 2:34:54 PM PST by Sean_Anthony

Ditching fossil fuels as proposed in Lima, Peru by the environmental architects of gloom and doom alarmism and replacing them with renewables

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change met in Lima, Peru, December 1-12, 2014, determined to chisel a new treaty that would mandate a cap and trade on greenhouse gas emissions effective by 2020 and would “eliminate the use of fossil fuels entirely by 2050.”

The hypothesis that rich nations caused climate change by burning fossil fuels to produce energy has never been proven by IPCC’s computer modeling. The fact that now the hypothesis changed its name from global warming to climate change in the face of obvious 18 years of global cooling is enough evidence that the purveyors of the industry of climate change are desperate but are not giving up. Fleecing rich countries with carbon taxes is a very lucrative scam.

“We must leave fossil fuels in the ground and not repeat the steps of the developed countries that brought us to this point,” said Enrique Maurtua Konstantinidis, international policy advisor for Climate Action Network Latin America.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: climatechange; fossilfuels; globalwarminghoax; hoax; lima; opec; peru

1 posted on 12/07/2014 2:34:54 PM PST by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
We must leave fossil fuels in the ground

What you mean "we," Kemo Sabe?

2 posted on 12/07/2014 2:44:47 PM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
“eliminate the use of fossil fuels entirely by 2050.”

Effin' Kerry hardest hit.


3 posted on 12/07/2014 2:50:07 PM PST by Libloather (Embrace the suck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
Only the Gruber-Stupid actually believe the Greenhouse Theory.

Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide - Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts? By Timothy Ball

No Smoking Hot Spot (The Australian)

The missing hotspot (JoNova)

Those two articles take Greenhouse Theory at face value and by the criterion set up in the theory itself finds no evidence of warming on the basis of greenhouse effect.

Sky-high hole blown in AGW theory?

"Forbes reports on a peer-reviewed study that uses NASA data to show that the effects of carbon-based warming have been significantly exaggerated. In fact, much of the heat goes out into space rather than stay trapped in the atmosphere, an outcome that started long before AGW alarmists predicted:"

That article explains why no Hot Spot has been found.

The Hidden Flaw in Greenhouse Theory

Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics

Harvard astrophysicist dismisses AGW theory, challenges peers to 'take back climate science'

It Is Impossible For A 100 ppm Increase In Atmospheric CO2 Concentration To Cause Global Warming

Simple Chemistry and the Real Greenhouse Effect.

Those five articles each show that Greenhouse Theory has no basis in reality due to a direct conflict with the known laws of physics. No wonder the smoking gun "hotspot" can't be found.

Claim That Sea Level Is Rising Is a Total Fraud

That article kills any thought of planetary warming from any cause. Think about it. If there is absolutely no sign of an acceleration of sea level rise how could the planet be warming? The rise in sea level in the last 100 years is far less than the average over the last 18,000 years caused by the inter-glacial period we are in.


4 posted on 12/07/2014 2:59:54 PM PST by TigersEye (ISIS is the tip of the spear. The spear is Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
"determined to chisel a new treaty that would mandate a cap and trade on greenhouse gas emissions effective by 2020 and would “eliminate the use of fossil fuels entirely by 2050"

If worldwide surface and aquatic plant light have adapted to higher atmospheric carbon dioxide levels by growing larger and increasing their numbers, what will happen to agriculture when the surplus supply is suddenly throttled down?
5 posted on 12/07/2014 3:02:20 PM PST by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

The Obama Tax Hikes, which have gone hand in hand with The Obama Recession, have helped lead the world to an economic downturn and an oil glut.

The Saudis are winning hearts and minds all over the world by keeping production higher — and their timing may have something to do with this ridiculous global warming hoax summit in Peru.


6 posted on 12/07/2014 5:48:51 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Celebrate the Polls, Ignore the Trolls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson