Posted on 08/06/2014 5:14:39 AM PDT by servo1969
(By the way, copy and paste this garbage into something that has spell check and look at all the red lines. This person can't even be bothered to spell normal words correctly and that's ignoring the stupid made up feminist lingo.)
Whoops. There’s an F-bomb in there that I didn’t catch.
Sorry about that.
I bet witchwind readers are great fun at parties.
Romans 1:26. ‘Nuff said.
This is not accidental, random, or even crazy—it is deliberate. Increasingly, you see Liberals making up rules to redefine the very core of reality. Some other examples:
— Entitlements help the economy
— You are the gender you think you are
— Islam is a religion of peace
— Illegals have every right to be here
Basically, they are trying to lead us to a state where we believe that reality is what THEY say it is—regardless of facts or common sense. Sadly, it’s working.
So, I’m guessing PIA and PIM are off the table
Contents
The SCUM Manifesto consists of an introduction, a list of grievances, and a conclusion.[20] The manifesto opens with the following declaration:[33]
“Life” in this “society” being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of “society” being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation and eliminate the male sex.
Solanas begins by presenting a theory of the male as an “incomplete female” who is genetically deficient due to the Y chromosome.[34] According to Solanas, this genetic deficiency causes the male to be emotionally limited, egocentric, and incapable of mental passion or genuine interaction. She describes the male as lacking empathy and unable to relate to anything apart from his own physical sensations.[35] The manifesto continues by arguing that the male spends his life attempting to become female, and thereby overcome his inferiority. He does this by “constantly seeking out, fraternizing with and trying to live though and fuse with the female.” Solanas rejects Freud’s theory of penis envy, and argues that men have “pussy envy”. Solanas then accuses men of turning the world into a “shitpile” and presents a long list of grievances.[36]
The bulk of the manifesto consists of a litany of grievances against the male sex. The grievances are divided into the following sections:[37]
War
Niceness, Politeness and “Dignity”
Money, Marriage and Prostitution, Work and Prevention of an Automated Society
Fatherhood and Mental Illness (fear, cowardice, timidity, humility, insecurity, passivity)
Suppression of Individuality, Animalism (domesticity and motherhood) and Functionalism
Prevention of Privacy
Isolation, Suburbs and Prevention of Community
Conformity
Authority and Government
Philosophy, Religion and Morality Based on Sex
Prejudice (racial, ethnic, religious, etc.)
Competition, Prestige, Status, Formal Education, Ignorance and Social and Economic Classes
Prevention of Conversation
Prevention of Friendship and Love
“Great Art” and “Culture”
Sexuality
Boredom
Secrecy, Censorship, Suppression of Knowledge and Ideas, and Exposés
Distrust
Ugliness
Hate and Violence
Disease and Death
Due to the aforementioned grievances, the manifesto concludes that the elimination of the male sex is a moral imperative.[38] It also argues that women must replace the “money-work system” with a system of complete automation, as this will lead to the collapse of the government and the loss of men’s power over women.[39]
In order to accomplish these goals, the manifesto proposes that a revolutionary vanguard of women be formed. This vanguard is referred to as SCUM. The manifesto argues that SCUM should employ sabotage and direct action tactics rather than civil disobedience, as civil disobedience is only useful for making small changes to society. In order to destroy the system, violent action is necessary: “If SCUM ever marches, it will be over the President’s stupid, sickening face; if SCUM ever strikes, it will be in the dark with a six-inch blade.”[40]
The manifesto ends by describing a female-dominated utopian future in which there is no money, and disease and death have been eliminated. It argues that men are irrational to defend the current system and should accept the necessity of their destruction.[41]
SCUM as literary device
In 1977, Solanas told Smith and Van der Horst, “[”’the society’”] .... [i]s just a literary device. There’s no organization called SCUMthere never was, and there never will be.”[42] Claire Dederer said, “Solanas ... described [the term] SCUM as a kind of ‘literary device.’”[43] Solanas said to Smith and Van der Horst, “’[she] thought of it as a state of mind .... [in that] women who think a certain way are in SCUM .... [and] [m]en who think a certain way are in the men’s auxiliary of SCUM.’”[44]
Reception and criticism
Various critics and scholars have analyzed the Manifesto and Solanas’s statements regarding it. Daily News reporters Frank Faso and Henry Lee, two days after Solanas shot Warhol, said Solanas “crusades for a one-sex world free of men”.[45] Prof. James Martin Harding said she “propose[d]” a “radical program”.[46] Prof. Dana Heller said the author had an “anarchic social vision”[47] and the Manifesto had “near-utopian theories”[48] and a “utopian vision of a world in which mechanization and systems of mass (re)production would render work, sexual intercourse, and the money system obsolete.”[49] According to Village Voice reviewer B. Ruby Rich, “SCUM was an uncompromising global vision”,[14] in the Manifesto criticizing men for many faults including war and not curing disease; many but not all points were “quite accurate”;[14] some kinds of women were also criticized, subject to women’s changing when men are not around;[50] and sex (as in sexuality) was criticized as “exploitative”.[51] According to Janet Lyon, the Manifesto “pitt[ed] ... ‘liberated’ women ... against ‘brainwashed’ women”.[52]
Feminist critic Germaine Greer said that Solanas argued that both genders were separated from their humanity[53] and that men want to be like women.[54] Alice Echols says the Manifesto articulates gender as absolute rather than relative.[55]
Heller argued that the Manifesto shows women’s separation from basic economic and cultural resources and, because of psychological subordination to men, women’s perpetuation of that separation.[56] Robert Marmorstein of the Voice said that SCUM’s main message included that “men have fouled up the world” and “are no longer necessary (even biologically)”.[57] Jansen said Solanas considered men “biological[ly] inferior”.[58] According to Laura Winkiel, the Manifesto wants heterosexual capitalism overthrown and the means of production taken over by women.[59] Rich and Jansen said that technology and science would be welcome in the future.[60][61]
Jansen describes the plan for creating a women’s world as mainly nonviolent, as based on women’s nonparticipation in the current economy and having nothing to do with any men, thereby overwhelming police and military forces,[58] and, if solidarity among women was insufficient, some women could take jobs and “unwork”, causing systemic collapse;[62] and describes the plan as anticipating that by eliminating money there’d be no need to kill men.[63] Heller said the Manifesto would let drag queens live and be “useful” and “productive”.[64] Jansen and Winkiel say that Solanas imagined a women-only world.[65][66] Winkiel says the Manifesto imagines a violent revolutionary coup by women.[67] Prof. Ginette Castro found the Manifesto was “the feminist charter on violence”, supporting terrorist hysteria.[68] According to Jansen, Solanas posited men as animals who will be stalked and killed as prey, the killers using weapons as “phallic symbols turned against men”.[69] Rich, Castro, reviewer Claire Dederer, Friedan, Prof. Debra Diane Davis, Deborah Siegel, Winkiel, Marmorstein, and Greer said that Solanas’ plan was largely to eliminate men, including by men murdering each other, although Rich thought it might be Swiftian satire and that men’s retraining was an alternative in the Manifesto, Castro did not take the elimination of men as serious, and Marmorstein included criminal sabotage of men.[43][53][57][70][71][72][73][74][75][76]
According to Jansen, it called for reproduction only of females,[58] and not even of females once the problems of aging and death were solved so that a next generation would no longer be needed.[77]
While, according to Lyon, the Manifesto is irreverent and witty,[78] according to Siegel the Manifesto “articulated bald female rage”[79] and Jansen says the Manifesto is “shocking” and breathtaking.[80] Rich described Solanas as a “one-woman scorched-earth squad”[51] and Siegel says the stance was “extreme”[81][a] and “reflected a more general disaffection with nonviolent protest in America overall.”[81] Rich says the Manifesto brought out women’s “despair and anger” and advanced feminism[51] and, according to Winkiel, U.S. radical feminism emerged because of this “declaration of war against capitalism and patriarchy”.[3] Heller suggests the Manifesto is chiefly socialist-materialist.[82] Echols has argued that Solanas had “unabashed misandry”,[83] and people associated with Warhol (whom she shot) and various media saw it as “man-hating”.[
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCUM_Manifesto
I am glad you cleared up the PIV. I really did not want to google that. This whole country must have a brain eating disease everyone is losing it. Maybe if these “women” met a real man and married him, they would be treated better.
And how close is this nonsense thinking to the current effort to force homosexuality down society’s throat?
Notice there is no mention of PIA. Guess that’s perfectly acceptable to the whack job that wrote this article.
Not real ones any way!
I think witchwind wrote this stuff to turn herself on.
She just wants to be laid.
How is our species supposed to propagate?
And when my wife suggests that I shower and shave after dinner..is she just “asking” for it.
I don’t get it.
Wow, Just WOW!
Idjits!
And feminists wonder why most “regular” women completely reject their agenda. Most feminists are not even pretending to act like a female. From the picture posted, I don’t understand the author’s fears about PIV. Any man, unless very drunk, would require her to put a bag over her head. But, I shouldn’t be so mean, should I? LOL.
after seeing its picture... I cant understand why I even wasted any time with this thread. This is clearly the case of a desperate loser...
I’m going to go out on a limb here and suggest that the author of this screed is a sexual abuse survivor in need of serious therapy.
So sad.
May cause PIR (penis in retreat)
When I see stuff like this I just have to think:
Someone needs to be voted off or better yet onto a whole different Island. The sooner the better and then we just sit back and wait for father Time to do his job.
On the other hand I did run across something a while back that really made me think. It was a piece on how some people hate the human race and themselves so much for a being a part of it that they’ll go to amazing lengths in their minds to remove that connection between the two.
Translation:
"As a certifiable moron I've always said PIV is rape"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.