Skip to comments.Homosexuality and the Heterosexual Dilemma
Posted on 03/22/2014 5:53:24 PM PDT by jxb7076
From a socio-moral-biblical perspective Homosexuality is much more complex than it appears on the surface and can be argued from various viewpoints ranging from Scientific, Biblical, and Secular to name a few. Read more at: http://jxb7076.hubpages.com/hub/Homosexuality-and-the-Heterosexual-Dilemma
(Excerpt) Read more at jxb7076.hubpages.com ...
By golly, yer right...I’m a lesbian...I loves me some womens;-)
lol - to each his/her\their own. :)
No dilemma for me! Homosexuality is perversion. End of story. The reasons are many and varied.
Same here. Women totally rock. How in the Hell can two guys shack up? Does not compute.
Judaism's Sexual Revolution: Why Judaism (and then Christianity) Rejected Homosexuality
Ok now explain Lesbianbutchdikeism.
Judaism's Sexual Revolution: Why Judaism (and then Christianity) Rejected Homosexuality
Maybe... just maybe, it is not genetic.
Hmmmmm. that may be mentioned in the article covering transhumanism.
Interesting article. I think they articulated their dissaproval very clearly.
The bible is certainly on the subject.
Lesbian, Butch, or Dyke. The Arabs are no longer allowed to even whisper the term without the possibility of being beheaded.
Rubbish. God says it is horrible sin. End of story.
yup.....a male lesbian: a man who loves women :)
Doesn’t matter what you call it or what you accept, the world as a whole has become more forgiving of a variety of folks which usually means that it has become more atheist - anything goes.
It will only get worse but as Rome fell from such atrocities, it seems that we are headed in the same direction. The past seems to come back to haunt us. The likelihood of civilization (as we currently know it) continuing for another few generations gets smaller at time passes.
Perhaps due to the same reason the North Pole was going to melt already. I do not but their conclusions or the morality that flows from it, over what the Creator states. .
We are born human. Regardless of inner proclivity, and the effects of the fall, we cannot justify acting according to sinful desires.
In the case of human sexual behavior, which is the greater sin - the homosexual who violates biblical teachings in accordance to Leviticus 20:13 - or the heterosexual who is guilty of the teachings in the book of Romans 13:8-10?
There are two kinds of sin, physical and of the heart. A drunk may be a nice person, while the clean living men may be a cold hearted vindictive man. Homosexual relations are the worse sins in the sexual area of physical sins, but it also flows from idolatry, and is usually concomitant with pride, sensuality, selfishness - and arrogant denial of sin. And adultery when "married."
Both are evil then, but few defend adultery, theft, etc. etc esp. as normative and healthy, and demands special treatment for their lifestyle.
if they have accepted a homosexual lifestyle and is comfortable with their choice they should have the freedom to live life to the fullest without discrimination, harassment, or violence.
Really? Sin away says this pseudo Christian. Even taking just the typical exercise of the "lifestyle," what other consensual act would you justify that typically, mainly among males, results in a greatly increased incidence of infections diseases and premature death, and has been the main cause behind half a million American's death, and for 79% of new HIV cases today.
And the estimated lifetime cost of treatment for one person with HIV is $379,668 (in 2010 dollars)
Meanwhile 41% of people who are transgender or gender-nonconforming have attempted suicide sometime in their lives, nearly nine times the national average.
But what they do behind closes door does not affect anyone, right?
We recently had two instances of men having sex with dogs in our area. My son-in-law opined that a parrot would be the worst animal to have sex with because they can tell.
My daughter and I were cracking up laughing. I don’t think bestiality is funny but his remark was.
Horse pucky, there is no dilemma because the Bible clearly defines homosexual actions as sinful while also stating love the sinner.
Great insights - thanks for sharing yoiur viewpoint on the subject.
I can’t argue your point.
The only thing I don’t agree with Prager on, is that he states that the only “central distinction in sexual morality was the distinction between active and passive roles.-—the gender of the object...is not problematic.”
That wasn’t particularly true with the Greeks, especially the philosophers who studied nature and teleological ends like the Athenians.
The Spartans ignored philosophy entirely-—they were the odd ones whom removed boys at 7 from the home and forced them to live in barracks with the same sex until age 30. This was a warping of the child who was partnered with a mature male to be trained for battle and used for sex.
It is not unlike the segregation in muslim nations and is why homosexuality—especially pederasty is ‘normal”. (Walid Shoebat stated that the Saudis prefer boys for sex.) The men in Afghanistan don’t train the boys for valuable trades/soldiering-—they just use them for sexual recreation and they remain ignorant and will use boys in harems when they grow up—as trained.
But most Greek City States would always guard their sons and boys—the elites didn’t want men to rape their sons. They even enacted laws and hired guards to prevent it.
Here is an interesting article on Ancient Greece for those so inclined.
That **is** funny. :)
I gotta keep an eye on you ALL the time.
No more going out in public without a Handler, and I DON’T mean BROOKE!
It is a malady, a disorder, an abnormality, an aberration.
Let’s just sum it up...perverts.
“Homosexuality is much more complex than it appears on the surface..”
This is hogwash-—homosexuality is a simple fixation in Latency; immaturity. The person is unable to “mature” and appreciate the “Other”—true diversity—because of childhood trauma...mostly sexual abuse but it can be peer rejection and emotional or neglect in very early childhood (Psychogenesis by Moberly). Idolatry and Narcissism is always much easier than maturity and selflessness and the ability to love the “other”.
The warping of young children is fairly simple, especially for boys. Boys have a harder time in early childhood because they have to separate from the Mother (autonomy) but then re-identify with a male role model. Without this modeling and embedded interaction between mother and father—worldview/object of desire can be distorted and the boy is easily confused.
Mostly, homosexuals are abused, which embeds strong, irrational emotions concerning the object of desire, during childhood which are not easily shaken.
OK, not being any kind of "expert" in the area, and no, I didn't spend the night at a holiday Inn Express last night, and basing this on "common sense," I'd say it is a choice. And not a good one. If one accepts that "lifestyle" as normal, you have a mental disease. Even if you worship "Mother Nature" or "Giea" or another man made god, you are a damaged individual and actual biology (or what ever Ogy you want to apply,) and natural selection will kill you.
Thought I explained, that Ms. Brooke was fer domestication services....;-)
Sorry I got SAST (short attention span theater)
Kinda like the “Hearfors” (walking into a room and going ?What the h&ll did I come in here for???)
“I enjoy being/enjoy being/I enjoy being a girl!’’—’’from “The Flower Drum Song’’.
Can’t anyone have fun in a thread? I’m sick and damned tired of homo behavior thrust into my face. I never said I accept homosexuality, and I think that you read too much into funny posts...I loves every square inch of MrsSgtBob’s hot bod.....are ya pickin’ up what I’m puttin’ down?
Songs from my childhood, interspersed with Englbert Humperdinck songs....
Thanks to that particular use of that word “lesbian”, the inhabitants of the island of Lesbos nowadays call themselves Lesvonian.
And I am a lesbian trapped in a male body! LOL.
Sure you can have your fun. You seem to take offense though that others might not, that is okay. Actually, your comments were funny and not offensive.
Guess I gotta learn a new language;-(^)
I was not offended...my post ended on a frivolous note.
I know we use </sarc>....perhaps we might start using </friv>?
I strongly support your analysis!!
“but few defend adultery, theft, etc. etc esp. as normative and healthy, and demands special treatment for their lifestyle.”
Actually in our modern US that has LONG been essentially the case. Been there, done that. Treat everything as if it is no big deal.
My Bible says God created Adam first. Then, using a rib from Adam, God created woe man, er, I mean woman. Your analysis can be rewritten to say that God added a ‘tail’ to the “Y” chromosome, to produce woman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.