Posted on 10/25/2013 1:52:57 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin III has quickly become a favorite of Republicans with his quest to delay the individual mandate to buy health insurance under Obamacare.
Though that effort doesn’t seem to have much traction, it’s one that could start giving vulnerable Democrats heartburn.
The West Virginian announced Wednesday that he is working with Georgia GOP Sen. Johnny Isakson to craft a one-year delay of the insurance requirement of the landmark health care law. That idea has already picked up the endorsement of Michelle Nunn, the Democrat seeking Georgia’s open Senate seat in 2014.
“It has become apparent in recent weeks that implementing this law will take some time. That’s why I supported a delay in the mandate on businesses,” Nunn said in a statement. “And it is why, I believe that in light of the recent implementation challenges, I agree with bipartisan efforts led by Georgia Senator Johnny Isakson to postpone the insurance penalty for Georgia families.”
But many incumbent Senate Democrats — even some from conservative-leaning territories — have shown far less favor to the year delay, despite the deeply troubled rollout of the government website intended to help the uninsured buy coverage.
North Carolina Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan says the administration should waive the tax penalty for not having coverage during what she says should be a two-month extension of the open enrollment for the new exchanges.
“I am asking the Administration to extend the open enrollment period by two months, and waive the penalty for the individual mandate for the same period of time, to make up for time that is being lost while the website for the federal exchange is not functioning,” Hagan said in a statement.
Hagan is one of 10 Democratic senators, led by Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, who have signed on to a letter calling for the Obama administration to extend open enrollment further into 2014. The letter was a reaction to widespread reports of people being unable to use the HealthCare.gov website successfully.
An aide to Sen. Michael Bennet said that his boss is simply seeking an extension of the enrollment period. The Colorado Democrat was one of the senators who signed the letter and isn’t up for re-election this cycle.
Fellow signatory Mark Begich of Alaska explicitly opposes the full-year delay of the individual mandate, an aide said Friday. Begich would like to see the current yearlong delay on the employer mandate extended for an additional year, however.
This may all prove to be a moot point, with the Obama administration signaling Friday that it expects the troubled HealthCare.gov to be fully up and running for most users by the end of November, well before insurance coverage is set to begin.
Senate Democratic leadership has taken a wait-and-see approach, looking for cues from the administration as to how to proceed on any legislative effort that might make changes to the health care law.
Even though they are frustrated by Manchin and his public campaign to delay the mandate — including on Fox News Channel’s “The O’Reilly Factor” — they are not yet prepared to respond in any way.
First, Manchin has yet to produce legislative language and has not announced any Democratic co-sponsors.
An aide to Sen. Dan Coats said the Indiana Republican has invited Manchin to sign on to a proposal that Coats has already written. It would delay the individual mandate for a year and put into law the Obama administration’s executive action delaying the employer mandate for a year.
Second, much of the recent uptick in congressional complaints against the health care law and the individual mandate has been spurred by the failures of HealthCare.gov in the first few weeks of its operation.
President Barack Obama in an Oct. 21 Rose Garden speech vowed that the website would be upgraded so that more Americans could buy insurance with less hassle.
Senate aides say they are waiting to see whether the president lives up to his promise and what changes they might need to push outside the administration’s efforts in the weeks and months ahead.
Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio is pushing his own plan to stall the mandate until six months after the Government Accountability Office certifies that HealthCare.gov is functioning as intended.
“I think we’re going to continue to have a debate about the merits of Obamacare. All this says is we should not be penalizing anybody until this website is working because that is the main way we’ve told people they’ll be able to get health insurance,” Rubio said Friday on CNN.
Of course, the potential of a Manchin-backed amendment on the floor might create a bigger political quagmire than any of the strictly GOP proposals, given Republican opposition to the underlying law.
Vulnerable Democrats, such as the ones who signed on to Shaheen’s letter, could face a political quandary. If they support a one-year delay, they could be accused by groups such as the National Republican Senatorial Committee of being flip-floppers who are running away from their original votes to create the law. If they oppose it, they could be accused of penalizing people who, through no fault of their own, were unable to sign up for health insurance.
If Democratic leaders in fact follow the administration’s lead on this issue, it’s very unlikely they will support delaying the cornerstone of the health care law while they’re under siege politically from Republicans. But either way, Manchin has created political exposure for his colleagues on a bill that has a near-impossible path to becoming law.
Republicans should NOT go along with any Democrat plan to delay Obamacare. Let the Dems sleep in the bed they made. The choice the Repubs should offer the Dems is repeal it or live with it.
Midterm elections are coming up and the Democrats are in a spectacular train wreck.
Republicans would be fools to offer them any relief. Particularly after the Democrats’ incredible nastiness.
The trap is for Democrats.
Manchin makes scum look good in comparison. He needs to be cut off at the balls.
The delay is going to have people thinking about how much they're going to have to dish out when the mandate kicks in. They'll be even angrier if the dems try to enforce it later.
Hey Joe.
Didn’t you read this before the initial vote, and ask what the consequences of this law would be.
Now that the cat is out of the bag nice try to look like you were always concerned.
P.S. I don’t remember you supporting Ted Cruz either...
I believe this is one time that it will be more productive to sit back and watch the show
There is damage. Those responsible for it need the pain. That includes voters.
Will some others get hurt? Undoubtedly. That’s the price we have to pay to destroy Obamacare. Socialist ideas must be destroyed and that means those who advocate it, and those who vote for it, have to suffer. The only unfortunate thing is that others have to suffer as well.
Be a warrior.
I believe this is one time that it will be more productive to sit back and watch the show
Me too.
The more the D’s show how they are out to protect themselves the better.
They are the ones who passed this in a herd mentality , so a few leaving the flock won’t forgive them of their initial decision.
Don’t give the enemy a way out. Unconditional surrender. That means destroying their ideas.
Correct.
Obamacare is not a bad idea “right now” ... as if delaying it would really help somehow.
Obamacare is simply a bad idea ... now, next month, next year, whenever. Delaying it, tweaking it, adjusting it ... all these things are useless. It cannot be fixed. It needs to be abolished completely.
We’ve been in this middle ground for almost 100 years thinking a little poison is ok. Then there’s a little more. And a little more. And a little more.
It’s killing us.
It’s addictive and it’s killing us.
There can be no middle ground.
Get rid of Obamacare. Get rid of the Great Society. Get rid of the New Deal. Get rid of it all.
Socialism Kills.
Doesn’t look like they’ll have to take the vote. The president has said nothing is being delayed and Reid is backing him.
And from the looks of this, the Democrats who are upset can’t agree on the language of such a delay.
“with the Obama administration signaling Friday that it expects the troubled HealthCare.gov to be fully up and running for most users by the end of November, well before insurance coverage is set to begin.”
We won’t hold our breath.
Whatever they do include the Vitter bill
Which is why the American people MUST be allowed to experience the full brunt of the excruciating pain of Obamacare, if it's ever to be repealed.
Not only that, it delivers a perfect opportunity for the whole country to experience a life lesson in real time about the differences between full-blown left-liberalism, and the common sense workability of conservatism.
Obamacare will prove to be the death knell of leftist/Socialist/Communist/Democrat political philosophy in this country, if we simply allow it to run the course of its predetermined implosion.
The biggest threat to that eventual outcome, is compromised, corrupt, quisling Republicans throwing the Dems a lifeline.
Obama can delay the individual mandate if he wants.
Republicans would do best to stay out.
Wait. What?
Please don't tell me there are Republicans who want to help Manchin throw the rats a lifeline by delaying Mengelecare??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.