Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Immigration” Bill – About Amnesty or ELIGIBILITY??
The National Patriot ^ | June 27, 2103 | Craig Andresen

Posted on 06/28/2013 11:37:07 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Oh this is definitely an attempt to cover for Dear Reader but no CONSTITUTIONAL law can be written that will make the USURPER LEGAL.

Even if they were to pass a law that would decriminalized past identity fraud, Obama is in a class by himself.

Only one office requires a NBC. And there is only one way to change that (by two different processes) by a CONSTITUTIONAL Amendment.


21 posted on 06/29/2013 8:55:33 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
The republicans should simply add an amendment to this that exempts it from applying SPECIFICALLY to anyone claiming the name of Barrack Hussein Obama and claims to be President of the United States of America as well as anyone else who may have enabled any false representations thereof.

They've told us he is legal all this time. This exemption should be no problem if he is legal so they have nothing to fear.

22 posted on 06/29/2013 3:06:37 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue
"Oh this is definitely an attempt to cover for Dear Reader but no CONSTITUTIONAL law can be written that will make the USURPER LEGAL."

Absolute truth. Great point.

23 posted on 06/29/2013 3:08:33 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Smokeyblue

.
.

- With the 1400 plus pages of the unread Immigration Reform Bill is a blanket pardon for “anyone” committing crimes and lying on any and all applications or forms.

- That would cover fraud on Selective Service applications, Birth Certificates, information submitted to state bar associations.

(Barack Obama [claimed he had never used drugs in his life - refuted by him in his first autobiography: “...maybe a little blow...”] and Michelle Obama [she was knowingly involved in illegal actions while working at a high paying no-show job at a Chicago hospital and forced to surrender her Illinois state law license] no longer have a license to practice law anywhere in the United States of America. Why not? Just what did they do to lose their valuable law licenses?)

SOURCE:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3036818/posts

“That and the provision that fines employers $5000 for not hiring a *newly legalized illegal* over a citizen.”

- think about that sportsfans

-

- another lovely new blantant affirmitive action scheme by Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder is the US Department of Justice suing corporations for using the criminal backgrounds of job applicants
to disqualify the hiring of any person with a criminal record.

- Think of it as “forced redistribution” of wealth while killing the American economy and putting “Whitey” out of work.

- Now you know why corporations are using temporary personnel companies so Obama and Holder cannot sue them -

.
.


24 posted on 06/29/2013 3:31:21 PM PDT by devolve (----- ----- ----- it not unlegal iffen I do*s it ----- ----- -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson