Posted on 06/24/2013 5:59:03 PM PDT by Common Constitutionalist
Imagine this scenario. A husband-and-wife are married in the Catholic Church. The wife gets pregnant. They have a falling out and get divorced. The now ex-wife wishes to have an abortion but her ex-husband wishes her to have the baby.
Putting aside our views on murder abortion, the husband decides to challenge her decision. Rather than take her to civil court, he and she go before a Catholic tribunal. The tribunal rules that the woman must carry the baby to term and upon the baby's birth relinquish he/she to the father who will have full custody.
The woman doesn't stand for this ruling and takes the matter to her state court, but the state court upholds the Catholic ruling.
Now how many liberal organizations would have a cow over this? Naturally all of them. And might the Obama justice system inject themselves into this case? Of course they would.
Surprise. I would agree with the libs. This case should be decided in state court and a tribunal ruling should have no bearing on its outcome. Why? Because there is no place in this country for a parallel judicial system.
Yet with the infiltration of the Muslim brotherhood and our overwhelming political correctness, how long will it be before Sharia law becomes that parallel system?
Another surprise. It's already here, in a manner of speaking. Liberal judges are and have been deferring to Sharia law for years when adjudicating cases.
You may ask how prevalent it is, or more to the point, just how bad it could get?
Well, whenever you wish to predict the future, one merely has to find a similar situation that has already occurred and walk it back. Knowing that liberals and progressives follow the same patterns no matter where or when they reside, you can, with a fair amount of certainty, predict our future.
Political correctness coupled with fear is strangling Europe. As bad as it is here, it's much worse in European countries. Predictably, France is at the politically correct forefront.
To date there are over 750 "No-Go Zones" in French cities, containing over 5 million Muslims. What's a No-Go Zone? The PC name for it is "Sensitive Urban Zone". Ah, that sounds nice, does it not?
What they are is whole swaths of a city where French law enforcement has virtually no presence. It's a separate country within the city. These areas are controlled by Muslims and the law they follow is Sharia, not French. These neighborhoods erect mosques to further radicalize their population, all financed by governments such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar. In other words, the Muslim brotherhood.
Oops. Not all the financing comes from Middle East. A lot comes from public assistance provided by the liberal French government. Assistance such as welfare benefits, etc., similar to those provided to Tamerlin Tsarnaev in Boston.
And it's not just France. This is happening all over Europe. Even Germany has a growing number of court cases where judges defer to Islamic Sharia law. Islamic "Shadow Courts" operate in every major German city.
So if we wish to see our future, whether it be our swift march to socialism and all the joy it creates, or the rise of Sharia, we have only to look across the pond.
Common Constitutionalist ~:(From the article) “ To date there are over 750 “No-Go Zones” in French cities, containing over 5 million Muslims.
What’s a No-Go Zone? The PC name for it is “Sensitive Urban Zone”. Ah, that sounds nice, does it not?
“Political correctness is tyranny with manners.” - Charlton Heston
“PC” was originally called cultural Marxism,
and has the primary purpose of suppressing the truth. “
“PC” was originally called cultural Marxism,
and has the primary purpose of suppressing the truth ,and freedom. “
There is a reason why Islam is called “ Submission “
Islam and Democracy are exactly the opposite of each other !
So if mooselimbs can create enclaves for themselves (see Dearborn, MI) with no complaints from the libs, can we conservatives create our own enclaves, outside of the corrupt liberal regime now running the country?
Hardly!
You can’t eat Sharia. Ask the Egyptians.
Libertarians want the woman to have unrestricted access to abortion during the entire 9 months, while at the same time, allowing the husband to enforce his no abortion control over her, as long as that is what his church says.
Their current argument at FR is to let your personal church make the marriage laws for you.
Already arriving in some parts.
Imagine this scenario:
Amnesty passes. Places like Dearborn, Mich; Murfreesboro, Tenn and Paterson, NJ, elect radical Islamists to US Congress, since they’ve now become citizens and not only, able to vote, they can run for office.
You know that will happen!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.