Posted on 06/05/2013 12:55:36 PM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Mike Zullo is interviewed by radio talk show host Pete Santilli about what happened at the Constitutional Sheriff's And Peace Officers Association Convention. He states that he was scheduled for a one hour session behind closed doors with constitutional attorneys and sworn constitutional law enforcement officers. He revealed that the one hour session ended up being a 4 hour presentation behind closed doors and the audience was floored with what he presented. He reveals in this interview what the next steps will be in moving forward and calls for select committee when congress gets back from summer recess.
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2013/06/audio-sheriff-joe-obama-fraud.html#idc-cover
Part one of the interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1D1hxN1Uvao&feature=player_embedded
Part two: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9bWnk5Z5OI&feature=player_embedded
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
“Oddly interesting they put so little effort into such a critical piece of their deception, almost like they don’t feel the need to care any more.
Did they not think it would get this far? Are they that arrogant or sloppy/lazy or is there some other reason?
What do they know or have planned to negate such a major mistake?”
I don’t believe it was a mistake to put the PDF online the way they did. I believe the document is good enough to fool the vast majority of the idiots who voted for this guy, so that the majority of people in this country would believe the issue was settled (in favor of the Kenyan usurper.)
Knowing that the vast majority of Americans would either support the Kenyan usurper or, at the very least, not care about the issue anymore, the gauntlet was thrown down at the feet of a spineless Congress with the challenge: “Now do something about it. I dare you.”
Knowing that Congress is the only place where this can be addressed now, do you think the Kenyan usurper’s sycophants in the Demon-crat party, media, or the feckless Republicans will pick up the gauntlet?
He’s counting on his popularity, historicity, and color to shield him from the truth. So far it’s worked better than I imagine even he could’ve hoped for.
Hehehe. She now has a legit one in hand so she is over qualified!
She is in administration and I do joking refer to myself as the "First Man", but she is a Conservative woman so she would get the Palin treatment.
Arrogant. And their counter was the IRS and other fedgov powers per any other fascist regime.
Yes, criminal charges can be filed at the state level.
BTW, this would lead to a Constitutional Crisis. May be what obastard wants, but that’s no reason to stop pursuing the truth.
I think they were sloppy and arrogant about it because they know they can get away with it. Think about it, if your child knows they can get away with something, they do it, right? It’s human nature (for immature people- maturity is doing the right thing no matter if you won’t get caught or not).
I truly believe that even if zero were to be proven 100% fraudulent, nothing would be done about it. Remember Hillary!’s “What difference does it make now?” or hillbilly’s “It was only sex” when he lied under oath and was impeached? Immoral people don’t care about morality, and the dems (and a majority of the electorate) have proven themselves immoral. Nixon was brought down because BOTH SIDES were against him. The left will NEVER EVER EVER abandon zero or hillary! or hillbilly. EVER.
I told my IT friend about Sheriff Joes original presser and he said "you know I have a copy if that file from when he first hit the internet. I don't think that the president would be so stupid to put a digital forgery out for scrutiny, but I'm going to look at it". About half an hour later, I heard a loud "HOLY SH**" from his office and I just cracked up laughing.
Hi Stingray,
I opened the PDF in either Illustrator or Photoshop. (20 years experience with PS, less with Illustrator) and the layers were right there.
Now the investigator said that the file was uploaded from a Mac platform document viewer program that “scrubbed” the mega-data— which I assume would have flattened the image and converted it to a jpg or tiff format. But the image was uploaded as a pdf file, which preserves layer information.
I can’t resolve the pdf with the scrubbing utility claim made by the investigator. Can you explain?
I’ve always wondered why they didn’t flatten the image. Was it deliberately preserved by a guilt-ridden underling, or was it an inside joke? The whitehouse has posted a lot of questionable images in the past (Bin Laden for example) so they have at least one person employed in that capacity, probably more. Now, there has been one death from among the people I would expect to be close to that operation, and I can’t help but wonder.
If the pdf release was a deliberate open door intended to reveal the fraud, who might be the party responsible? Any ideas?
From your keyboard to God's inbox.
In the event this epic fraud is finally exposed the GOP establishment is going to be revealed as at least a bunch of enablers if not co-conspirators. Much of the pubbie partie will implode in addition to the obot wing of the dem party. If Hillary has enough evidence that she bucked Benghazi up to the POTUS and she was just being a loyal soldier, she may well end up to be the big beneficiary.
Maybe it was intentional.
Like a challenge - “Catch me if you can. I (we) can put out this piece of crap and they will believe us.”
Why not issue such a challenge when you have the entire MSM and Foxes Bill O’Rielly covering for you?
5thGenTexan
Was she born in Texas?
If she was born in Hawaii do you think she could have gotten that lfbc?
From what I have heard, Hawaii no longer issues lfbc’s, rather a computer generated “summary” type of document which does NOT have the full info that the traditional lfbc’s have.
What Hawaii has done (presumably as result of many folks asking about 0’s lfbc; I recall before this started that Hawaii issued the standard lfbc to a person needing theirs for a passport, etc.) impacts ANYONE born there that needs to get a passport.
Butterdezillion,
Pinging you to this, because it shows that passport office does indeed require the lfbc, and IIRC Hawaii started issuing computer generated “summary” type of document which does NOT have the full info that the traditional lfbc’s have, and Hawaii started doing this after the 0 birth cert inquiries started.
Or was it a short time before, maybe ‘06 to ‘07?
Yes, she was. And later, after our vacation, I need to compare the two documents and determine the differences. Right now, the new one is being used to rush a passport for our trip.
DoughtyOne,
Maybe you SHOULD have your wife apply for her passport so y’all can go on a cruise, and see if the passport office gripes about the county-issued lfbc like they did with 5thGenTexan.
If they do, then there is something going on..... once is an accident, twice is coincidence, three times is conspiracy.
We need to see if there’s a third (or more) freeper who has run into the same thing.
As I said to 5thGenTexan in the other post, I wonder if any folks born in Hawaii have had this problem.
In 2011 I asked the HDOH for any documents describing their procedures for standard and abbreviated birth certificate requests. I was told there were no documents - which wouldn’t make sense if there was a “memo” from 2001 saying that the standard birth certificate that a person would receive when they request their BC is a computer-generated abstract - the ONLY thing they could get.
But there was no 2001 memo. The PDF of that supposed-2001 “memo” was created the day that Obama released his long-form forgery; I’ve got a screenshot of the document’s properties showing that creation date. The “policy” is as illegal as heck, but even if it was legal it could not be in effect until it was published for the public to see = which was April 27, 2011. IOW, that policy went into effect the day that Obama released his long-form forgery.
Coincidence? You tell me. The HDOH was issuing certified long-form copies at least until mid-March 2011. The myth that they didn’t was carefully orchestrated between the White House and the HDOH, which should tell everybody all they need to know about the integrity - and independence - of both parties.
Many thanks for that info!
So we need to ask
Have there been any folks that were born in Hawaii that, since april ‘11, have had any difficulty getting their lfbc from the state, in order to get a passport.
Or for anything else that needs it, such as a security clearance.
Similar to what 5thGenTexan’s wife encountered (even tho born in Texas)
And get info as to exactly when the problems, if any, were encountered.
If folks can still get their old style lfbc’s, then that is one more nail in the case.
Not coincidence at all!
When I said “we” I meant all y’all reading this; freepers, ask around freeperdom and your familywife and friends.
Familywife s/b family; dunno why that got put in there....
Based on the information I have, I believe they did a poor job because they were expecting a BC from Hawaii that would work fine, but Onaka had the integrity to mark the BC as ALTERED. The White House plan was for Obama to disclose this thing in the morning and then immediately hop on a plane and fly to Chicago to yuk it up on Oprah for the low-information voters. Their plan had a hard deadline and Onaka’s monkey-wrench made them scramble. They had to C&P (from the BC they were sent) Onaka’s certifying statement and signature and the date stamp, which suggests to me that they had to get rid of something in the area where those things were.
Anyway, I believe they botched a bunch of stuff because they weren’t expecting to have to change anything on the BC. I believe they had HDOH Director Loretta Fuddy (who replaced Neil Palafox as HDOH director after he balked) order Onaka to create a totally fake BC for Obama using the statute that allows a new BC to be fabricated by the HDOH if law enforcement says it is necessary to protect the registrant. This was right after the Giffords/Roll shooting in that “crazy birther state”, Arizona.
Ultimately the only way we’re gonna know is when the actual records are produced - paper, microfilm rolls from multiple random years as well as August of 1961, computer transaction logs, depositions (with polygraph if necessary), etc. And that’s why we need a federal investigation. There is good evidence that Hawaii has acted in very, very bad faith (and actually criminally, I believe) towards every other state in the union, and the feds really NEED to get involved, to sort this out.
So, a word to new parents, get the paperwork done in a timely manner. I know the SSN stuff gets handled while in the hospital now at least here, and was happening when our kids were born (30 years ago).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.