Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Cringing Negativism Network
“My understanding is, they are the driving force behind this new policy?”

Not that I know of. The question was put like this: Shall we exclude some boys from partaking of the Blessings of BSA activities? How would it be acceptable to tell a young boy that he is not welcome in the Boy Scouts. All boys should be welcome. The motto of “morally straight” is one that will continue to be in effect and the LDS-led troops will not fail. Meanwhile, gay scout leaders are not acceptable because they are ADULTS who are charged with awesome responsibilities to maintain the upright tenets of the BSA.

27 posted on 06/02/2013 9:34:05 AM PDT by District13 (I miss my country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: District13

Leave the definition as it has been for years.

That was perfect.

That is not what happened. The definition was changed, and my point is, the LDS was a force behind the change. Is that not the fact? My point is it appears to be, the LDS contributed to that change.

If that is not the fact, then they as a major influence should reverse this pig-headed stupidity right now.

Now.


28 posted on 06/02/2013 9:37:13 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: District13

Not that I know of. The question was put like this: Shall we exclude some boys from partaking of the Blessings of BSA activities?


Yes. Little animal torturers, budding arsonists, and those who identify as “gay”, for starters.


37 posted on 06/02/2013 11:28:56 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: District13
Not that I know of. The question was put like this: Shall we exclude some boys from partaking of the Blessings of BSA activities? How would it be acceptable to tell a young boy that he is not welcome in the Boy Scouts. All boys should be welcome. The motto of “morally straight” is one that will continue to be in effect and the LDS-led troops will not fail. Meanwhile, gay scout leaders are not acceptable because they are ADULTS who are charged with awesome responsibilities to maintain the upright tenets of the BSA.

Once someone identifies as "gay" they are publicly declaring that they are not morally straight.

Do the mormons not accept the bible as scripture? Yet the bible is blatant and consistent in it's denounciation of this behavior. Going so far as say that homosexuals do not inherit the kingdom of God (that is, all homos go to hell)

How can any group that claims to follow Jesus Christ justify publicly embracing that which HE calls abomination?

So to welcome all boys they would have to take an oath of each boy that they are not 'gay'. I don't think many boys who identify as 'gay' would take such an oath (or if they did they would lie and then continue their predations of inncoent younger boys).

51 posted on 06/03/2013 11:10:20 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: District13
LDS-led troops will not fail.
 
Bullshit.
 
IIRC, a Mormon/Kolobian Parrot was running PV when Davie Slusher was turned loose there for his "2nd Offense". 
 
 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/110542554/Boys-Scouts-of-America-Floyd-David-Slusher-File
 
B.S.A.  D.O.A.  R.I.P.
 

55 posted on 06/05/2013 6:07:51 AM PDT by TArcher ("TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS, governments are instituted among men" -- Does that still work?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson