Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Benghazi - Will The Truth Finally Be Told?
Political Realities ^ | 05/05/13 | LD Jackson

Posted on 05/05/2013 4:55:41 AM PDT by LD Jackson


This is just one of the important questions that we need the answers to. Will the truth finally be told about what happened in Benghazi on September 11, 2012? Heretofore, we have been lied to, deliberately misled about the events surrounding the deaths of four Americans who were serving their country. Chis Stevens, Glen Doherty, Sean Smith, and Tyrone Woods all died in Benghazi. While the deaths were tragic, in and of themselves, it gets worse. There appears to be clear evidence that the deaths could have possibly been avoided, but the truth has been hidden, covered up at every turn by the Obama administration.

For months, we have heard about the survivors of the Benghazi attack. At first, they were muzzled and the press had absolutely no access to them. Investigators were not allowed to talk to them and their stories were suppressed. At long last, some of them will finally be able to tell us what really happened that night in Benghazi. They will testify before a Congressional committee on Wednesday.

Fox News - Their identities have been a well-guarded secret, known only to their high-powered lawyers and a handful of House lawmakers and staff. But now Fox News has learned the names of the self-described Benghazi “whistleblowers” who are set to testify before a widely anticipated congressional hearing on Wednesday.

Appearing before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee will be three career State Department officials: Gregory N. Hicks, the deputy chief of mission at the U.S. Embassy in Libya at the time of the Benghazi terrorist attacks; Mark I. Thompson, a former Marine and now the deputy coordinator for Operations in the agency’s Counterterrorism Bureau; and Eric Nordstrom, a diplomatic security officer who was the regional security officer in Libya, the top security officer in the country in the months leading up to the attacks.

Benghazi, LibyaIf you care about what is happening in our country and around the world, you should care about the outcome of this hearing. We all should care about the information that will be revealed, if these three men are allowed to tell their stories with no limitations. Until now, the Obama administration has scrambled to hide the mistakes, and what appears to be a clear dereliction of duty, before, during, and after the debacle in Benghazi. I am hopeful that the truth will finally be told and justice will be served for the four men who died on that night.

There is one thing of importance to note, especially for any liberals who may read this post and want to accuse me of just piling on President Obama and trying to damage him in his second term. Nothing could be further from the truth. What I am interested in is the truth. From the small amount of evidence we have access to, it is clear that something went horribly wrong that night.

Even though I believe the Obama administration is culpable in what happened, and in the coverup that has followed, this is not about President Obama.

Even though the truth should have been revealed before last year's election, this is not about President Obama or how he managed to keep the truth under wraps until after he defeated Mitt Romney in November.

Even though it should bring down his administration because of their misdeeds, this is not about President Obama.

Hear me clearly. This is about the truth of what happened in Benghazi and how four of our citizens, who were serving their country, were allowed to die, even though we had ways to respond to the threat on their lives. I say again, we want the truth about what happened in Benghazi. Nothing more and nothing less.

TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: benghazi; benghazicoverup; benghaziwb; kenyanbornmuzzie; libya; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 05/05/2013 4:55:41 AM PDT by LD Jackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; Nachum; onyx; ...
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.

2 posted on 05/05/2013 4:58:04 AM PDT by MestaMachine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson

These people have to be completely up front with every last detail during the questioning. No more protecting anyone in this administration with mish-mash of “it was tragic and we were caught in an unfortunate circumstance.” He’ll no.. there’s been a major coverup and it needs to be exposed.

It’s high time for the bright light of the unvarnished truth to shine.

3 posted on 05/05/2013 5:01:14 AM PDT by ScottinVA ( Liberal is to patriotism as Kermit Gosnell is to neonatal care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson
Maybe, if the witnesses live long enough to testify.

Military Scramble Order Overseas, How They Work
First, I've got over 26 years working in military control towers, most of them as the watch supervisor/crew chief on duty.
Scrambling aircraft to respond to urgent situations normally starts at the North American Aerospace Defense Command.
The scramble order comes down through a secured phone call on a direct line.
In the attack on the U.S. embassy on Benghazi, the drone control would have been from MacDill AFB, FL, by U.S. Central Command, and would have been in direct contact, or maybe even remote control to the situation room in the White House.
Watch this 4 minute 48 second video Inside the Situation Room.
The pResident SHOULD HAVE issued to order to scramble fighters to Benghazi, to get there in minimum time.
Then he SHOULD HAVE issued a second order scrambling AC-130 gunships to respond to Benghazi, and have them stand by for more orders. This should have been controlled by the pResident, who should have monitored and responded with guidance from his Situation Room, Read
Here's one more piece of information.
Like Rush said:

Now we know that Obama was in the room watching Benghazi attack live.

I know from experience in the government (over 30 years) that the communication system allows for IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION to the SITUATION ROOM,
as well as other agencies, of notification of a critical situation such as this.
I'm sure technology has changed and only gotten better since I retired, but read this with focus onFLASH OVERRIDE and FLASH.
There is more you need to read.
Read post #48 of ""Under God" Removed By Obama During Inaguration Pledge" and know that we were warned of this.

This has been planned for a VERY LONG TIME.
Obama is solely responsible for this.
Hillary claimed “No Knowledge” of gun running
and told Rand Paul he needed to ask the CIA

Let's look at some of the facts.
So, let us remember. For a better understanding of the issue, read HISTORY of Mohammed ( spelled variously; Mahomet, Muhammed, Mehmet, etc. ). then watch William Federer explain it, from Jan. 25, 2012 at CC Chino Hills, CA. It's a MUST WATCH for everyone,Christians, Athiests and even Muslims!

As retired military myself, I've seen the damage of "keeping secrets" about bad leaders.
Obama is EVIL, pure and simple.
Please watch Glenn Beck with Trevor Loudon & his book "Barack Obama and the Enemies Within".
Then watch the 29 minute 13 seconds video Trevor Loudon- An Urgent (and chilling) Message for America.

Obama may be feigning "incompetence," thinking he's too sly, being a "wolf in sheep's clothing" since his mentoring was from Fabian Fascism..
The "Establishment Republicans" will probably NOT want to IMPEACH the TREASONIST Barack Hussein Obama II.
But it's better for the country that Obama suffer the penalty, the strongest penalty for his actions, and his inactions.
Let's look at the Presidential Oaths of Office.
Now who among us really believes Obama did any of that ?
To Obama, that was "Just words. Just speeches! "
Damn him ! Damn him to hell !

I'll finish this with asking you to read Watch the 18 minute 56 second documentary video "Absolutely Uncertain" at "" or on, narrated by Irina, the 23-year-old “Jewish New Yorker” and a former Obama supporter .

One other suggestion, read DID OBAMA WANT STEVENS DEAD?
The language is a little abrasive, but spot on. Also read:
4 posted on 05/05/2013 5:02:47 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson

Will the truth be told? I doubt it. These GOP Congresscritters have a history of overpromising.

5 posted on 05/05/2013 5:06:36 AM PDT by csmusaret (America is more divided today , not because of the problems we face but because of Obama's solutions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: LD Jackson

I will be curious to see how the MSM covers this on Wednesday.

7 posted on 05/05/2013 5:20:17 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson

The more relevant question is”will it be reported?” If MSM doesn’t report it it will become known but it will be treated the same as a conspiracy theory, something buzzed about on the net. It will get no traction at all, except the part about those mean Republicans harassing the president who is just trying to do his job.

8 posted on 05/05/2013 5:26:00 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's EconomTheiics In One Lesson ONLINE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson

I am confused. The past few days, these articles mention the ‘survivors’ of Benghazi, then speak of the ‘whistleblowers’, as if they are one in the same.

Were any of these three whistleblowers at the so called ‘safehouse’ ?

9 posted on 05/05/2013 5:28:24 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson

I certainly hope the truth comes out, but I bekieve a great deal of us already know what it is.

1. Obama had to go to Vegas to campaign.
2. al Qaeda was supposed to be on the run and ordering extra security would have put paid to that lie.
3. Obama needed to be re-elected and be free to campaign some more.

Look for another major manufactured crisis to come up to deflect our attention from Benghazi. Will it be another terrorist attack, bird flu, riots, another blood clot. I have no idea but it’s going to be a good one.

10 posted on 05/05/2013 5:32:49 AM PDT by mardi59 (IMPEACH OBAMA NOW!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

I go back to the notion that nothing happens in a vacuum, especially in DC.

We watched as Romney went after Obama on this issue in debate #1. We also watched as he suddenly went into defensive mode when Obama voiced his false indignation of the charges leveled by Romney. Then in debates #’s 2&3 Romney never brought it up again.

Seeing that Romney was not his own man through the campaign, it bring me back to my opening statement above. What happened behind the Mordor Curtain between 1 and 2? Something came to light I believe and couple that with how horribly the state of the union has been slipping.

So, if Romney were to win, the media would have pounced on him from day one and never let go. They would have turned the narrative that all the problems were now his fault, yadda, yadda, yadda. Benghazi would never have been brought up again because a Romney administration would not want that distraction and we know how the GOPe is deathly afraid of rocking the boat.

Maybe someone in the GOPe ivory tower figured out just how bad it was about to get no matter who was at 1600 and decided it would be better for the Democrats to be at the helm when the Crapola hit the fan. That way, the Democrat Party and Progressives in general would bear the brunt of a far worse coverup than some janitor happening to find a piece of tape on a door jamb.

11 posted on 05/05/2013 5:34:08 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson

Coverup....No matter..Not impeachable...because he’s clean and articulate

12 posted on 05/05/2013 5:46:11 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mazda77
That way, the Democrat Party and Progressives in general would bear the brunt of a far worse coverup than some janitor happening to find a piece of tape on a door jamb.

The rats will just blame Bush and the Republicans, and the low information voters, formerly known as idiots and chumps, will believe everything they say.

13 posted on 05/05/2013 5:49:35 AM PDT by Mark17 (My body is in California, but my heart is in the Philippines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mazda77
just watching Chris Wallace this morning the Democrat running dog lackey cut loose with the Democrat's only defense ~ that earlier the Republicans voted for a budget cut in a critical area ~ and that eliminated any ability to come to the aid of the folks in Libya.

This is the substitute lie they've trotted out to replace the now totally discredited OFFENSIVE VIDEO!

it would have been enough to convince Romney that the issues are too complex to be explained during a campaign ~ which, in fact, was true ~ but campaigns aren't for the purpose of arguing out the details of events where none of the participants are involved. They are, instead, for the purpose of rallying one's own troops and discrediting the other side's legitimacy.

Romney didn't need to argue a single detail ~ just accuse the Obamistas of betraying our troops in the field and killing an ambassador!

It's always been up to the Democrats to prove Obama and his crowd made the correct decisions ~ and they still can't do it.

BTW, the fact the Democrats so easily and effortlessly disarmed Romney is pretty much a sign that he had no more business as President than did Obama ~ both losers ~ both stupid.

14 posted on 05/05/2013 6:33:18 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson

The Benghazi affair is like the eligibility issue — they cannot divulge the truth because of the resulting domino effect among politicians.

15 posted on 05/05/2013 7:01:04 AM PDT by 353FMG ( I do not say whether I am serious or sarcastic -- I respect FReepers too much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

It will be reported in a dismissive tone. Nothing here America, just Republicans playing politics against our beloved President.

Pray for America to Wake Up

16 posted on 05/05/2013 7:05:29 AM PDT by bray (Surviving to spite Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Were any of these three whistleblowers at the so called ‘safehouse’ ?

No, which is why I want to hear from the people actually inside the house. These whistleblowers can say what happened through their communications but they weren't on the ground.

17 posted on 05/05/2013 7:07:20 AM PDT by bgill (The problem one is watching the Watch List!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

What happened between 1 and 2 is that Romney believed he was so far ahead in the polls that he didn’t need to go hard on the attack.

In hindsight, Romney’s internal polls and some formerly reliable national polls were way off the mark.

Romney went into election day believing he had it in the bag. He was blindsided.

18 posted on 05/05/2013 7:17:49 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LD Jackson

I want to know two things:

1. Who concocted the lame youtube video story and instructed Rice, Carney, Clinton, et al to spread the lie? Even though it was known immediately that it was al Queda sponsored.

2. Who ordered and carried out the extensive redacting of the intelligence report?

These are potentially criminal activities.

19 posted on 05/05/2013 7:23:42 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

Don’t bet on that, now they have a diversion the new war in the middle east between Israel and Syria.

20 posted on 05/05/2013 7:33:55 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson