The weight of the entire federal government will intervene to protect Onaka. They have the resources, and they have too much to lose.
Consider how anyone targeted gets railroaded (Terry Lakin, and George Zimmerman come first to mind. Consider also Larry Sinclair and the actions of Joe Biden’s son).
Then consider how we never heard anything of importance from Rezko, who is neck deep in the mire there, despite oversight from a US attorney who was a Bush appointee. Consider the complete absence of results from police investigations of the murders in the Chicago church run by Rev. Wright, and the DC shooting of Lieutenant Quarles Harris.
Justice through official means? We’ve waited now, for 5 solid years.
They cannot stop a special prosecutor who is authorized by the House, especially now as it is controlled by the GOP.
They can attempt to hamper the SP’s investigation or their surrogates in the press will surely attack his character, but they cannot stop the SP’s investigation. The reason is it is not the federal government that controls the evidence, it is the State of Hawaii and states are subordinate to an SP’s subpoenas. In other words, unless Onaka takes his own life or someone else does it for him, he will be made to answer the evidence against him.
Remember the SP who investigated Clinton? Ken Starr. Starr was never stopped. He only found that White House personnel had been used to lie about Clinton’s involvement with the intern as part of a sexual harassment lawsuit of Paula Jones. Clinton was impeached in the House on obstruction of justice but he was not convicted in the Senate because his crime or misdemeanor was not considered high enough. But without doubt the sordid events left the public wanting a new cleaner administration. But even then the vote fraud forces in Bush vs. Gore would have put Gore in the White House had it not been for Freepers in this forum who stopped a critical secret counting.
So that’s how it plays,
Fraud and Obstruction
Special Prosecutor
Indictments, Impeachment and Senate Trial
Vote Fraud
Clinton is a liar, so was Nixon. So is Obama. What if Obama says he never knew that HDOH had forged his BC, that they were zealous and reckless but he still believes he was born in Hawaii. He plays innocent of any wrong doing.
I am not sure Obama would be convicted in the Senate even with a GOP majority. The reason is based on the question of what high crimes and dismeanors is Obama guilty?
How does the USA remove a president who has not been proven guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors?
Certainly others can be prosecuted such as Pelosi and others who certified his eligility. But Obama? How if he pleads innocent based on ignorance?
Freepers will say yes but he’s ineligible! Yes, but Obama will say he is eligible and there is no evidence that he isn’t.
Freepers will say but the evidence was all phony! And Obama will say “yeah, those folks got a little to reckless but I was born in Hawaii, prove me wrong!”
So an SP will get Onaka, possibly get Pelosi and other high level democrat operatives but won’t be able to get Obama unless someone comes forward with evidence that Obama knew all along that he was not eligible.