Posted on 03/19/2013 8:30:58 AM PDT by Reaganite Republican
They left out God.
*** PING ***
Any whod like to be added to the RR ping-list, pls FReepmail me at Reaganite Republican
TIA~
If you are buying the flavor he is pushing, then you are ingesting RAT POISON!
I’m conservative, but the definition of conservatism that you have there is not correct. What you have there is a libertarian’s view of a conservative.
Libertarians do not believe in a “Robust National Defense.”
After 9/11, they (Cato / Reason) did not support invading Afghanistan.
They are limp-wristed, lilly-livered, tail-between-their-legs pu$$ies.
Conservatives believe in ending Corporate Welfare.
Corporate Welfare is supported by the Bushies-GOPe socialist wing of the Republican party. They are not Conservative.
This is friggin’ idiotic.
Conservatives don’t believe in personal freedom?
Nuts.
Whoever wrote this can go back to he||.
I was just thinking of a way to grade these idiots who will probably be running in 2016.
Due to the dumbing down of everything, it would have to be a PASS or FAIL system.
Which ones do you give a FAIL to on a given issue?
Which ones do you give a PASS to on a given issue?
These libertarian propoganda images are laughable.
You have the symptom right, but your diagnosis is wrong. The coddling of Islam has nothing to do with “separation of church and state” and everything to do with cowering of morally weak individuals in the face blatant intimidation.
This is not the fault of “Libertarians” but is the fault of all those, left or right, who think it is the business of government to interfere with individual rights in the name of “tolerance” or “security” or “fairness” or “safety” or whatever fig leaf they are using on the day.
I consider Libertarians to be -- psychologically -- very much like Liberals: immature.
Libertarianism does not agree that defending the innocent and helpless is a legitimate liberty interest the state should respect.
Here’s one way to look at this: You can consider TWO primary spheres of influence that the Gubbermint wants to get its grubby hands on:
(1) The Economic Sphere (tangible assets, goods and services)
(2) The “Hearts and Minds” of people (what they believe, how they think about things)
Now, I am a stubborn cuss, and short of shooting me, it would be difficult for a Gubbermint Agent to change my belief system. I can assume that others with strong personal convictions operate the same way. So, people of strong convictions are more or less “immune” to the Gubbermint’s attention to the second sphere.
On the other hand, for a Gubbermint to operate at all, it needs to be able to tax (and take) actual things of value from the first sphere. While a belief of mine cannot be seized, my house sure could. So, I look for proponents of small Gubbermint that advocate LESS INFLUNCE in the Economic Sphere.
Some preachy tea-totaller could advocate for a ban on alcohol, and that would just be water off my back. A man with a gun from the Gubbermint shows up at the house to confiscate my 150 year old Scotch, and I have a problem with that.
So, let’s get the Gubbermint to pass fewer laws about actual, tangible things, and I think we can let people’s personal beliefs work themselves out.
That's the three legged stool on which sits the abomination of desolation.
In order to ensure to citizens freedom of conscience, the church in the USSR is separated from the state, and the school from the church. Freedom of religious worship and freedom of antireligious propaganda is recognized for all citizens.The leftist chorus of separation blah blah has a definite source. Also note the special protection that was given to anti-religious and atheistic propaganda, above that of freedom to preach religious views (which is not mentioned and therefore did not exist).
1936 constitution, Article 124
Citizens of the USSR are guaranteed freedom of conscience, that is, the right to profess or not to profess any religion, and to conduct religious worship or atheistic propaganda. Incitement of hostility or hatred on religious grounds is prohibited.
In the USSR, the church is separated from the state, and the school from the church.
1977 constitution, Article 52
All this is, is democrat light, maybe worse. Personal freedom and tolerance for other peoples choices, could mean anything. Freedom to have sex with whoever and whatever you want; freedom to let kids smoke pot in kindergarten (they are citizens too) or sell heroin at the drugstore. Freedom to let parents kill babies after they are born. Politicians can start out with vague with laws and expand them to allow people to fulfill their every passion and desire.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.