Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A House Divided (Why Middle-Class Blacks Have Less Wealth)
Washington Monthly ^ | Jan/Feb 2013 | Thomas J. Sugrue

Posted on 01/25/2013 6:13:17 AM PST by Sir Napsalot

(snip) In the United States, where real estate is the single largest source of asset accumulation for the middle class, the story of the Sugrues and the Smiths goes a long way to explaining the expanding disparities between white and black wealth. The two families—like many Americans—invested in real estate both for its use value and as a gamble on the future. But one family did far, far better than the other.

Every once in a while, a scholarly book fundamentally shifts how we understand a problem. One of those books was published in 1995, .... Sociologists Melvin Oliver and Thomas Shapiro’s Black Wealth/White Wealth stepped into a stale debate about race, class, and inequality in the United States with new data and a fresh perspective. The authors acknowledged the gains of the civil rights era: Black-white income gaps had narrowed. Minorities were better represented at elite institutions of higher education than could have been imagined in 1960. ....

But (they) told another story, a sobering one about the persistent gap between black and white wealth. They methodically gathered and analyzed data about household assets, like real estate holdings, bank accounts, stocks and bonds, cars, and other property, that constitute a family’s portfolio. Their findings were staggering: despite all of the gains of the previous quarter century, the median black family had only 8 percent of the household wealth of the median white family. The asset gap was still strikingly wide among middle-class and wealthy blacks, who, despite their high incomes, still had about a third the assets of comparable whites.

The racial wealth gap has several specific causes beyond the broad legacy of systematic racial segregation, discrimination, and unequal opportunity. Wealth is passed down from generation to generation—even if only modestly. ......

...(Read the very long article, please.)

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonmonthly.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Society
KEYWORDS: inequality
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: MasterGunner01
Isn't that the same (similar) story we have here in Philadelphia? So far Philly has not gone as dramatic as Detroit, but the downward spiral can not be repaired.

You live and work in the city, you take what they dish out to you. What you read about corruption/extortion in Philly, it's all true, and probably just scratched the surface, not the worst of it.

21 posted on 01/25/2013 9:56:37 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

Because there living in the projects to show thier peeps thier down with the cause while buying designer clothes flat screen tvs, stereos and new flashy cars. Savings accounts? are you serious! Does stupid enter into this conversation? livin the gangster life on amiddleclass income. Just cant seem to shake the getto


22 posted on 01/27/2013 3:58:35 AM PST by ronnie raygun ( Lexington / Concord, America's first gun grab attempt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
Wealth differences, for the most part, reflects judgment differences. Wealthy people have made better (financial) value judgments than poor people. The book "The millionaire next door" discusses how wealthy people get wealthy. In the end wealth is accumulated through years and years of good judgment.

It is easy to talk about wealth discrepancies but how do you talk about wisdom discrepancies?

You can't fix stupid.

23 posted on 01/27/2013 7:00:41 AM PST by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BRL
>>> It is easy to talk about wealth discrepancies but how do you talk about wisdom discrepancies?

Because you can't.

Hence, Left had been preaching that “zero sum game” forever. “Your wise investment decision” was earned through exploitation of others.

Evil. But a majority bought into it.

24 posted on 01/27/2013 8:34:16 AM PST by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Sir Napsalot
Obama ignore that a major majority of the funding for government to build the infrastructure (and hence benefited you) came from makers, and where is the inequality of that?
Not sure what you are trying to say there - it's awkwardly phrased...

All I can say is that I worked up from the bottom, just like everyone else I know. I also know that, all along the way, my peers were white, black, brown, yellow, red, etc. We all had equal access to the same environment.

If someone tries to argue that no-one could succeed without the govt provided "goodies" then they must also accept that everyone who fails, failed *in spite* of those govt "goodies". Whether it's teachers, roads, or anything else funded by the "public", everyone has the *same* access to it. The difference is determined by how a given person avails themselves of the opportunities they identify and how they pursue those opportunities (govt provided or otherwise).

25 posted on 01/27/2013 10:35:29 AM PST by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson