Administration "litmus test": will you obey an order to fire on U.S. citizens?

TruNews ^ | 23 January, 2012 | Rick Wiles

[Errant]

Rick's guest on today's broadcast, 2009 Nobel Peace Prize nominee Jim Garrow shockingly claims he was told by a top military veteran that the Obama administration's "litmus test" for new military leaders is whether or not they will obey an order to fire on U.S. citizens.

"I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new "litmus test" in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders."

You need to hear this interview folks!

Streaming audio link

MP3 file download

[Errant]

It seems the good doctor is working hard to get the word out. He appeared on the AJ show today as well, where he went into much more detail about what he was told. Of course Alex couldn't resist suggesting who the retired officer might be, but overall a good interview here to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76h7bKc_-YI&list=UUvsye7V9psc-APX6wV1twLg&index=1

I expect to see this on the Blaze and Drudge report soon.

Remember, don't fire until fired upon. Doc mentions the unusal constraint American citizens have shown so far. He expects when the time comes, that will change.

[chuckles]

ping

[Errant]

Inteview with Rick Wiles at TruNews.Com begins at the 19 min mark.

[GraceG]

Rand Paul should work with the tea party members in the house to introduce a bill that makes it illegal for any member of the millitary to be asked by any other member of the executive branch if they will open fire on civilians.

Especially as a “litmus test” of any sort.

It is the sorta question that damned well should be “self evident”.

[Errant]

Related:

Restoring America with Author David Zuniga of "America Again"

[Sherman Logan]

It is the sorta question that damned well should be “self evident”.

True. The answer should be that it depends what those American citizens are doing. After all, the Constitution specifically provides "for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union (and) suppress Insurrections."

[2ndDivisionVet]

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.” ― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn

[LibsRJerks]

Wow. What a country that we have to now sit around wondering and worrying about this sort of thing ...even the rumor of it is disturbing.

Where did America go?

[huldah1776]

I don’t think I could shoot my Marine.

[zerosix]

Bill Clinton’s AG Janet Reno, had no problem getting that job done - right here at home in Texas!

[Travis McGee]

How can you tell which Quisling generals have taken the "shoot Americans" pledge?

See if they perform the "assault weapons" kow-tow.

[G Larry]

There is a difference between a commander giving an order and the troops following “an unlawful order”.

They will start by firing on so called, “right wing militia’s”.

That will be the warning to disperse and defend.

The brown shirts all have to go home sometime.